john roberts Options

[*kryogenix*]

I'm all for this guy. The ads saying he supports violence against abortion clinics are not true.

Agree or disagree?

[technicolour]

coughcough LIBERAL BULLSHIIITTT coughcough

But anyways. I'm all for him.

If you dig into everyone's closet you're going to find something that makes the guy seem like a bad guy. seriously. screw the past, it isn't going to be helping much.

People really need to be focusing on the matters at HAND not what he did 5 years ago. The world has changed since then and people need to embrace the change.

[illumineering]

coughcough LIBERAL BULLSHIIITTT coughcough

But anyways. I'm all for him.

If you dig into everyone's closet you're going to find something that makes the guy seem like a bad guy. seriously. screw the past, it isn't going to be helping much.

People really need to be focusing on the matters at HAND not what he did 5 years ago. The world has changed since then and people need to embrace the change.

The resume of Mr. Roberts is an historical record of his education, work experience, competence, integrity and temperament. A thorough review of this record is not only prudent, but a legal requirement for appointment to the court. What he has done over his entire professional career is going to determine the rating he is assigned. The basis for this evaluation is going to come from the past.

The matter at hand is the completion of the assessment of Mr. Robert's credentials. He will be thoroughly evaluated beyond the scope of 5 years. He is nominated for the highest court in the United States. Any candidate for that position needs to withstand thorough scrutiny to sit on the bench that is responsible for judicial review on the federal and state level as well as interpretation of the constitution.

[zepfel]

The resume of Mr. Roberts is an historical record of his education, work experience, competence, integrity and temperament.  A thorough review of this record is not only prudent, but a legal requirement for appointment to the court.  What he has done over his entire professional career is going to determine the rating he is assigned.  The basis for this evaluation is going to come from the past.

The matter at hand is the completion of the assessment of Mr. Robert's credentials.  He will be thoroughly evaluated beyond the scope of 5 years.  He is nominated for the highest court in the United States.  Any candidate for that position needs to withstand thorough scrutiny to sit on the bench that is responsible for judicial review on the federal and state level as well as interpretation of the constitution.

i agree. also, 5 years may seem a lot now, but at his age, his political standing is not likely to flutter gratuitously (sp?) from one end of the scale to the other.