bombings on japan, were the really needed |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
bombings on japan, were the really needed |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 664 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,686 ![]() |
do u guys think the 2 bombs dropped on japan during WW2 were really needed?
i say no because they just killed innoc3nt people in those 2 citys and it left a perment mental damage on my grandma (im japanese) so what do u guys think |
|
|
![]() |
*mipadi* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
Arguably for "psychological purposes", but again, was that necessary? Perhaps not. A field-test of the weapon was also a motivation for the drop.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
QUOTE(mipadi @ Jul 26 2005, 12:24 PM) Arguably for "psychological purposes", but again, was that necessary? Perhaps not. A field-test of the weapon was also a motivation for the drop. yet even after the nagasaki, the top army commanders stil held a coupe against the emperor. if nagasaki didn't happen, more of them would have helped, and overthrown the emperor. think osaka. villages with bamboo stakes waiting at the shore to meet the GIs. women and children jumping off cliffs because death was better than capture. if the US had to resort to a land invasion of japan, do you see what would happen? the army saw. the plan was to gas the entire island with nerve gas. and then go in with GIs. sounds much better than bombing a city, right? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |