Half-Blood Prince Discussion, Spoilers |
Half-Blood Prince Discussion, Spoilers |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() when we speak, we breathe ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,635 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,760 ![]() |
Since Anna mentioned a new topic for discussion of the book, I figured I'd just create the new topic, that way people can talk about the book here, instead of in the other thread, that people can use who haven't finished/read the book yet.
QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Jul 17 2005, 4:32 AM) and i also know who RAB is. Regulus Black, the brother of sirius black, who was murdered by the dark lord ages ago. How were you able to figure that it was him? The only real problem I had with this book, was the first chapter, with the Minister. I don't really see that it was too relevent, other then telling us that the muggle world saw these deaths are regular murders (aside from trying to figure out how someone died when they were alone and locked up) and whatnot.. But it was just really irrelevent, and ticked me off that it had really little meaning with the rest of the book. Maybe it'll tie in for book 7, hopefully. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 779 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 90,808 ![]() |
i was upset that harry went all "spiderman" on ginny, NOT FAIR NOT FAIR. and those of you that were harry and hermione fans, its been hinted so many times, of rons growing jealousy, and hermione's knowing. so yeah.
it makes a LOT of sense for RAB to be R and B because two people WERE needed to extract the locket. wait, so is the locket destroyed or not?(not sure if i read that in other people's replies) i was extremely upset when snape was really a bad dude. and as someone else said earlier, what if this is all part of a master plan? i find that extremely unlikely, and a bit corny and stretched out if its really true. dumbledore is usually right, i was so upset that severus was a death eater for sure. i think there is another reason as to WHY dumbledore trusted snape besides the one where he overheard the beginning of the prophecy. there has to be another reason... it is possible that ginny weasley is a horcrux. it is very likely that harry will have to actually kill a PERSON to destroy volde- he-who-must-not-be-named. you guys forgot something (possibly) didn't dumbledore think nagini was a horcrux? he said it was possible that a living thing can be a horcrux, so your idea of ginny was a veryyy good one. i can't believe dumbledore died. i mean i suspected like neville or a kid dying. harry didn't seem that upset about it, he cried a lot and all, but he was much worse when sirius died. im guessing its because it was his first death? poor poor bill. and i was really surprised fleur didn't really care at all. she seems so much more shallow than that. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() i <3 peter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 350 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 147,825 ![]() |
QUOTE(aeyungg xd @ Jul 19 2005, 11:33 AM) All "Spiderman"...... ![]() I agree, though. It would make an awesome twist if Ginny were the 6th horcrux! Sad, but I'd love to see that realized from Harry's point of view... I think it would be predictable for Harry to be the horcrux, though... maybe JK will twist things up and make it Ginny... or, like... Neville... Or something. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |