Creating topics in feedback. |
| *Azarel* |
 Jul 7 2005, 04:33 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest  |
I think that perhaps there should be a set minimum requirements in order to contribute to the feedback forum. I mean, look at some of the recent feedback threads. They're from people who either have no posts at all, or from people who don't have that many posts. And some of them aren't even feedback, they're just questions.
For example: "my posts stoped going up." "hacker r us?" "stop post the same topic in two different forums" "haha another one" Why should people who are not even active on createBlog have any say on how createBlog is run? If the changes they want are taken into effect, it won't affect them, the lurkers, but it will affect many of the active users. With a set of minimum requirements for feedback, such pointless topics could be lessened, maybe even avoided. (And people! Stop saying we need more staff! Or that we need more staff doing this or that.  There's nothing staff can do about that.)
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
| *mipadi* |
Jul 8 2005, 02:48 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
It seems a bit elitist to say that only certain members have a right to contribute feedback. Post count is never a reliable indicator of commitment or interest in a forum; is it right to say that a person who posts 1000 crappy messages has more of a right to contribute feedback than one who posts 25 good posts, and reads every post everyday? I think the system is fine the way it is; yes, you might get some crap in the feedback forum, but I think it's better to err on the side of caution and allow a lot of feedback, no matter how bad some ideas might be, than limit feedback.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 02:34 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 when we speak, we breathe  Group: Member Posts: 1,635 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,760 |
QUOTE(mipadi @ Jul 8 2005, 3:48 PM) It seems a bit elitist to say that only certain members have a right to contribute feedback. Post count is never a reliable indicator of commitment or interest in a forum; is it right to say that a person who posts 1000 crappy messages has more of a right to contribute feedback than one who posts 25 good posts, and reads every post everyday? I think the system is fine the way it is; yes, you might get some crap in the feedback forum, but I think it's better to err on the side of caution and allow a lot of feedback, no matter how bad some ideas might be, than limit feedback.  Your thoughts on this are my thoughts as well. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Azarel Creating topics in feedback. Jul 7 2005, 04:33 PM
mzkandi I agree but what exactly would be the minimum requ... Jul 7 2005, 04:36 PM
Azarel QUOTE(mzkandi @ Jul 7 2005, 2:36 PM)I agree b... Jul 7 2005, 04:37 PM disco infiltrator maybe just official members?
but, still have it v... Jul 7 2005, 04:50 PM Azarel QUOTE(headphones @ Jul 7 2005, 2:50 PM)maybe ... Jul 7 2005, 04:53 PM disco infiltrator they could also do that without being able to repl... Jul 7 2005, 04:55 PM Azarel QUOTE(headphones @ Jul 7 2005, 2:55 PM)they c... Jul 7 2005, 04:58 PM disco infiltrator iunno. i guess then, we just leave it how it is? c... Jul 7 2005, 05:04 PM Spiritual Winged Aura I totally agreed with you. My ideas are similar to... Jul 7 2005, 06:10 PM wind&fire just make it minimum post count... Jul 8 2005, 02:32 AM suntaxis Ok then where are we to ask for help? Jul 8 2005, 03:48 AM niez_cho QUOTE(suntaxis @ Jul 8 2005, 4:48 PM)Ok then ... Jul 8 2005, 09:08 PM tcunningham1589 What kind of help are you asking for? Jul 8 2005, 04:26 AM yellowgurl i agree.. i think minium post count is a good idea Jul 8 2005, 08:29 PM KissMe2408 Yah the feedback forum is not for questions on CB.... Jul 11 2005, 02:26 PM racoons > you i agree with jordan, katie, and mipadi
just becau... Jul 12 2005, 01:25 PM toodlepops. Yes, I agree bout the minimum post count thing. I ... Jul 31 2005, 01:00 AM electric shock What if someone not that active has this wonderful... Jul 31 2005, 01:08 AM basick i think it is fine as it is. maybe if regular mode... Jul 31 2005, 01:12 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: