Next-Gen Consoles, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360, Revolution Options

[KrunkMuzik]

The Next Generation Consoles... Here are pics of either protypes or official designs of the Sony PlayStation 3, Microsoft Xbox 360, and Nintendo Revolution. Im a BIG fan of the PlayStation series, but the design of the PlayStation 3 looks a lil retro don't you think? Scanner-ish... I really don't like the design of the controller neither. But overall, It's uh... "sexy" lol. We finally get a choice of colors too! I personally like the black one! The Revolution looks awesome as well, but I don't like Nintendo, so moving on. Xbox 360... I wouldn't call it a console anymore. It looks like my dad's Gateway computer...

Which one you think is the best?
Anyways, here are pics. Enjoy!

Sony PlayStation 3
Pic 1
Pic 2
Pic 3
Pic 4
Pic 5

Microsoft Xbox 360
Pic 1
Pic 2
Pic 3

Nintendo Revolution
Pic 1
Pic 2

[*RiC3xBoy*]

Heres are my opinions:

Nintendo Revolution: i am very curious to see how much Nintendo will try to beef it up to compare with the PS3 and Xbox360. The gamecube was a good console IMO, but the games were just....almost kiddish.
Pretty soon, i felt like it was out of the running compared to ps2 and xbox. Nintendo will have to make a drastic change if it wants my vote

XBOX360: When the first xbox came out, i was a little biast, and kinda thought it wasnt nearly as powerful was the ps2. I was wrong. Although i dont have full trust in microsoft, i do believe that it will throw less crap at us than sony. If it does turn out more powerful and better, i will glady pick this over the ps3.

PS3: As much as i like sony, i feel as though it wasnt as good as its former glory. when i first read the article about killzone looking the same as some of the early ps2 games, it got me thinking if sony is just getting lazy. But, one thing that has yet to fall short of my expectations is the games that sony provides which i thoroughly enjoy. Im very unsure if this is the system to get, ill just have to wait for more info

[*kryogenix*]

Heres are my opinions:

Nintendo Revolution: i am very curious to see how much Nintendo will try to beef it up to compare with the PS3 and Xbox360. The gamecube was a good console IMO, but the games were just....almost kiddish.
Pretty soon, i felt like it was out of the running compared to ps2 and xbox. Nintendo will have to make a drastic change if it wants my vote

Kiddish? As opposed to Kingdom Hearts? Yeah, Mickey Mouse is so NOT kiddy.

I'm sick of this "Nintendo is for the kids" argument.

XBOX360: When the first xbox came out, i was a little biast, and kinda thought it wasnt nearly as powerful was the ps2. I was wrong. Although i dont have full trust in microsoft, i do believe that it will throw less crap at us than sony. If it does turn out more powerful and better, i will glady pick this over the ps3.

The XBOX is many times more powerful than the PS2.

PS3: As much as i like sony, i feel as though it wasnt as good as its former glory. when i first read the article about killzone looking the same as some of the early ps2 games, it got me thinking if sony is just getting lazy. But, one thing that has yet to fall short of my expectations is the games that sony provides which i thoroughly enjoy. Im very unsure if this is the system to get, ill just have to wait for more info

It's hard to meet expectations when Sony over hypes everything.

[*RiC3xBoy*]

Kiddish? As opposed to Kingdom Hearts? Yeah, Mickey Mouse is so NOT kiddy.

I'm sick of this "Nintendo is for the kids" argument.

I didnt mean Nintendo is for kids, i was implying that more of the games Nintendo makes usually brings in the younger crowds and teenagers. While sony makes their fair share of games like that, i feel as though sony has more of a variety of games for older gamers.

[ThunderEvermore]

I didnt mean Nintendo is for kids, i was implying that more of the games Nintendo makes usually brings in the younger crowds and teenagers. While sony makes their fair share of games like that, i feel as though sony has more of a variety of games for older gamers.

Nintendo makes games for EVERYONE. Young and old alike.

Remember the 80s when entire families would gather around their Atari or Nintendo and play asteroids or something? Of course you dont, youre too young, but it happened. And it was glorious. No one said those games were kiddy because they could be played by everyone.

Teenagers, adults, old men still play Mario games.

Meanwhile, the non first party games, there is just as much M-rated games as any other system. Plus, RE4. Hello, Nintendo exclusive. Full of scary goodness.

Get with the program folks, just becuase everyone says Nintendo is kiddy, doesnt mean it is. Just because everyone buys an IPod doesnt mean its no good. And just because everyone watches reality TV doesnt mean its worth while to watch.

[*RiC3xBoy*]

Nintendo makes games for EVERYONE. Young and old alike.

Remember the 80s when entire families would gather around their Atari or Nintendo and play asteroids or something? Of course you dont, youre too young, but it happened. And it was glorious. No one said those games were kiddy because they could be played by everyone.

Teenagers, adults, old men still play Mario games.

Meanwhile, the non first party games, there is just as much M-rated games as any other system. Plus, RE4. Hello, Nintendo exclusive. Full of scary goodness.

Get with the program folks, just becuase everyone says Nintendo is kiddy, doesnt mean it is. Just because everyone buys an IPod doesnt mean its no good. And just because everyone watches reality TV doesnt mean its worth while to watch.

One, i didnt say games like asteroids were kiddy

Two, yes, now that i think about it, Nintendo games r made for EVERYONE and i take back what i said

Three, the reason i said that Nintendo made "kiddy" games were because games like Paper Mario or Star Fox Adventures looks like a game that would usually whoo younger audiences more than adults in my opinion.

Four, the fact that i stated Nintendo made kiddy games was my opinion. it doesnt make me right nor wrong, just what i think