Double Standards, Men vs. Women Options

[rOckThISshYt]

As I'm sure everyone knows, there are many double standards when it comes to men and women. The most obvious and known one is:

Girl sleeps around=slut/smut/whore/hoe/hoebag (AND SO MUCH MORE! )
Guy sleeps around=pimp/player/playa/stud/"true" man/etc...

Now, that's just cruel. I don't even think men should sleep around. But there are many more double standards than that, too. I mean, there are some unfair ones when it comes to men, too.

Girls can hit guys all they want but a guy can never hit a girl. Not only is it not be fair for them to defend themselves (which it should be), it implies taht woman are infirior, less capable, and weaker. Honestly, a lot of them time we are. But that's just natural because men have hormones that make them build muscle much easier than us chicas. Now, I'm not saying that if we go full force at men they should pound this sh!t out of us. But I do think they should be aloud to maybe slap us back. Not hard. But it's only fair. (Not in a relationship, though, because it's known that the woman have more power. )


I was just wondering what you thought of these double standards. Also, if you can think of any more, post them. And we can reply our thoughts about those, too. Just... er.... yeah. reply.

[xlauren73x]

another double standard.. men are more commonly convicted of sexual harrassment crimes before women.

[Paradox of Life]

another double standard.. men are more commonly convicted of sexual harrassment crimes before women.

That's true. People have come to some sort of conclusion that men are more sexually active or are more interested in sex. But why would someone just make up such a theory? It's reasonable to make that sort of assumption that a man would sexually assault a woman instead of a woman assaulting a man. It's happened on MANY occasions. It's a double standard, but it's a reasonable double standard. Am I wrong?

[sadolakced acid]

That's true. People have come to some sort of conclusion that men are more sexually active or are more interested in sex. But why would someone just make up such a theory? It's reasonable to make that sort of assumption that a man would sexually assault a woman instead of a woman assaulting a man. It's happened on MANY occasions. It's a double standard, but it's a reasonable double standard. Am I wrong?

oh, most double standards that are 'reasonable' usually disadvantage men. as for the ones that disadvantage women, feminists have gotten them removed.

which creates an unbalanced set of double standards, with the heavier weight falling on men (hey, men are physically stronger and should carry more, right?)

in the SATs, most problems that use a person reference a minority, or a woman. of the 60+ people the SAT mentions, there is only one white male (in the test looked at). the white male was thomas jefferson (or ben frainklin, i forget)

the white male is the most advantaged and disadvantaged person in america.

[Paradox of Life]

oh, most double standards that are 'reasonable' usually disadvantage men.  as for the ones that disadvantage women, feminists have gotten them removed. 

which creates an unbalanced set of double standards, with the heavier weight falling on men (hey, men are physically stronger and should carry more, right?)

in the SATs, most problems that use a person reference a minority, or a woman.  of the 60+ people the SAT mentions, there is only one white male (in the test looked at).  the white male was thomas jefferson (or ben frainklin, i forget)

the white male is the most advantaged and disadvantaged person in america.

Well female double standards were actually opposed by the feminists which proves that perhaps they're not 'reasonable'.
When was the last time a female tried to rape a male? How is that even possible? I'm only saying that sex offenders are usually males, so I'd understand why one would assume most or all sexual assaults were done by men.
And women are proven to be less strong than men, which seems to be a very important asset. Women have quite a few disadvantages, which has led to female double standards. They're true and 'reasonable' to some extent, I suppose. But one shouldn't take advantage of it...