A Process of Appeal for Official memberdom |
A Process of Appeal for Official memberdom |
Jun 16 2005, 07:58 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
In the thread about the sex forum, Fallen_fairy brought up the point of some members, because they went for a long period before beginning to post after they joined, being unable to achieve they requisit 5ppd to become an official member
these people can become very active and dedicated members, but because they have a backlog of Zero post days, they cannot get their' ppd up, even if they do post up to 10 a day, and would clearly have a ppd which meets standars were it not for the long period of inactivity therefore,i think it should be possible for members with over 500 posts who want to become official members, but are unable to due to a low ppd should be able to launch an appeal by PMing an admin with there situation. if they prove themselves a positive part of the site by gaining the endorsement of two members and a moderator, then the yshould have their status changed to Official Member. = ) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| *Azarel* |
Jun 30 2005, 03:11 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
Sorry about bringing the thread back to life, I must've skipped over it before.
QUOTE(xxcrazyjewxx @ Jun 16 2005, 9:34 AM) Why should they be punished for not posting right away. If they really want to be an official member, then they wouldn't mind getting the endorsements. I am sure if you went away and your PPD went down and you couldn't get it back up, you wouldn't want to make a new account. Hon, I know you're a camp right now, but you can read this when you get back - I joined in January of '04 and I lurked around until June of '04. I liked my username too damn much to make a new one, so what'd I do? I stayed with it. Sure it took me six months, but I got my ppd up. Seven and it's still going up. If people want the official member status so badly and want to keep their username, then they will work for it.QUOTE(basick @ Jun 16 2005, 2:33 PM) this is a BRILLIANT idea... How ironic that you've already lost your status and you're a regular member again. Seven pages of introductions - sounds like spamming. /offtopici registered in the june of 2004 and didnt post until october of 2004 which meant i had 4 months of posts to catch up with... i had about 2000 posts when FINALY my post per day ratio was above 5... i had to psot in 7 pages of introductions forums to get my PPD above 5... lol... if this rule was enforced ack when i was a regular member... it would have been much easier to be an official member... QUOTE(MarchHare2UrAlice @ Jun 16 2005, 2:37 PM) well, yes. Refer to what I said to Rachel. ;xthis applies to people who have MONTHS of inactivity. such as steven or fallen_fairy. QUOTE(aznxboredxperson @ Jun 17 2005, 2:19 PM) That means, we will have less people interested in cB. -__- .. i dun like the idea. So you think we will have less members interested in cB if the official member is easier to obtain? Hm, some logic you have there.Anyway, I'm not big on the idea of endorsements for the official member status. However, if the minimum post count for the official member status were raised, it'd be great since I'm starting to see too many people trying to get fifty posts in one day for the mere service of the xtracker and then leaving after they get the status (which, they usually don't so they keep spamming). |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2005, 04:03 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() t3h koolest guy in cB ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,194 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 513 |
QUOTE(Azarel @ Jun 30 2005, 3:11 PM) How ironic that you've already lost your status and you're a regular member again. Seven pages of introductions - sounds like spamming. /offtopic eeveryone does it look in introductions yourself... and i didnt mean at one time hahaha and 7 pages was an exaggeration... maybe 2 pages |
|
|
|
racoons > you A Process of Appeal for Official memberdom Jun 16 2005, 07:58 AM
Frankie QUOTEif they prove themselves a positive part of t... Jun 16 2005, 08:25 AM
Rachel is love QUOTE(Frankie @ Jun 16 2005, 6:25 AM)that sou... Jun 16 2005, 11:34 AM
Weird addiction I don't really think that's a good idea. L... Jun 16 2005, 08:49 AM
ChasingLife87 I had the same problem after lurking around for qu... Jun 16 2005, 03:35 PM
racoons > you i dont see why its hassle
pm the admin with your ... Jun 16 2005, 03:51 PM
mzkandi I suppose the idea wouldnt be a bad idea if a me... Jun 16 2005, 03:53 PM
jordanriane QUOTE(mzkandi @ Jun 16 2005, 4:53 PM)I suppos... Jun 16 2005, 05:11 PM
mzkandi QUOTE(jordanriane @ Jun 16 2005, 6:11 PM)View... Jun 16 2005, 07:45 PM
jordanriane QUOTE(mzkandi @ Jun 16 2005, 8:45 PM)Uhhh..ye... Jun 17 2005, 09:56 PM
mzkandi QUOTE(jordanriane @ Jun 17 2005, 10:56 PM)Als... Jun 30 2005, 08:55 PM
sweetxsimplicity It seems like too much trouble.
Especially if it... Jun 16 2005, 03:58 PM
Rachel is love It is not just for the sex forum idiot. Jun 16 2005, 04:17 PM
racoons > you no, it isnt.
its for the visitor tracker too, plu... Jun 16 2005, 04:23 PM
mzkandi QUOTE(MarchHare2UrAlice @ Jun 16 2005, 5:23 P... Jun 16 2005, 04:29 PM
xcaitlinx i don't think that the whole "endorsement... Jun 16 2005, 04:24 PM
racoons > you i didnt mean endorsement as in having to write out... Jun 16 2005, 04:31 PM
xcaitlinx QUOTE(MarchHare2UrAlice @ Jun 16 2005, 4:31 P... Jun 16 2005, 06:18 PM
autumn. QUOTE(caytexo @ Jun 16 2005, 7:18 PM)are you ... Jun 16 2005, 07:58 PM
xcaitlinx QUOTE(autumn. @ Jun 16 2005, 7:58 PM)no, i do... Jun 17 2005, 03:15 PM
basick this is a BRILLIANT idea...
i registered in the ... Jun 16 2005, 04:33 PM
lbjshaq2345 i didnt start posting for 2 weeks after my account... Jun 16 2005, 04:35 PM
racoons > you well, yes.
this applies to people who have MONTHS... Jun 16 2005, 04:37 PM
Heathasm i agree with the first post. i never had the probl... Jun 17 2005, 01:12 AM
racoons > you yeah cayte, i was talking about yours
again, your... Jun 17 2005, 05:39 AM
Spiritual Winged Aura That means, we will have less people interested in... Jun 17 2005, 04:19 PM
william ^why would we have less people interested? that ma... Jun 17 2005, 06:32 PM
sammi rules you mzkandi, go to english class.
(i'm just joki... Jun 17 2005, 10:05 PM
sammi rules you ^ i don't. i don't think i've even eq... Jun 30 2005, 06:38 PM
Frankie ^ me. actually, whenever i post in introductions, ... Jun 30 2005, 06:46 PM![]() ![]() |