A Process of Appeal for Official memberdom |
 Jun 16 2005, 07:58 AM
Post
#1
|
|
 Another ditch in the road... you keep moving  Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152  |
In the thread about the sex forum, Fallen_fairy brought up the point of some members, because they went for a long period before beginning to post after they joined, being unable to achieve they requisit 5ppd to become an official member
these people can become very active and dedicated members, but because they have a backlog of Zero post days, they cannot get their' ppd up, even if they do post up to 10 a day, and would clearly have a ppd which meets standars were it not for the long period of inactivity therefore,i think it should be possible for members with over 500 posts who want to become official members, but are unable to due to a low ppd should be able to launch an appeal by PMing an admin with there situation. if they prove themselves a positive part of the site by gaining the endorsement of two members and a moderator, then the yshould have their status changed to Official Member. = ) |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
| *mzkandi* |
Jun 16 2005, 03:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
I suppose the idea wouldnt be a bad idea if a member and two moderators could vouch for that person activeness to become an offical member and once they get their post count back up again it would be their responsiblity to keep it up. The only problem I can forsee is it would probably cause alot people who just want to use xtracker or something to bombard to people with request to endorse them. Of course a mod would be able to determine right away whether they are really active or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 16 2005, 05:11 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 when we speak, we breathe Group: Member Posts: 1,635 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,760 |
QUOTE(mzkandi @ Jun 16 2005, 4:53 PM) I suppose the idea wouldnt be a bad idea if a member and two moderators could vouch for that person activeness  View user profile > search user's posts > skim to look at date's of posts, etc. It's not that hard. |
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Jun 16 2005, 07:45 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(jordanriane @ Jun 16 2005, 6:11 PM) View user profile > search user's posts > skim to look at date's of posts, etc. It's not that hard. Uhhh..yeah duh. Your not telling me anything new  That wasnt even the point I was getting at. I already know admins check the post of those who want to become offical members.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 17 2005, 09:56 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
when we speak, we breathe Group: Member Posts: 1,635 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,760 |
QUOTE(mzkandi @ Jun 16 2005, 8:45 PM) Uhhh..yeah duh. Your not telling me anything new That wasnt even the point I was getting at. I already know admins check the post of those who want to become offical members.You said " if a member and two moderators could vouch for that person activeness." There would be no need to "vouch" for activeness, because all that has to be done, is to just view their searched posts, to just see if they've been active. Also, it should be "you're not telling me anything new."
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
racoons > you A Process of Appeal for Official memberdom Jun 16 2005, 07:58 AM
Frankie QUOTEif they prove themselves a positive part of t... Jun 16 2005, 08:25 AM
Rachel is love QUOTE(Frankie @ Jun 16 2005, 6:25 AM)that sou... Jun 16 2005, 11:34 AM Weird addiction I don't really think that's a good idea. L... Jun 16 2005, 08:49 AM ChasingLife87 I had the same problem after lurking around for qu... Jun 16 2005, 03:35 PM racoons > you i dont see why its hassle
pm the admin with your ... Jun 16 2005, 03:51 PM mzkandi QUOTE(jordanriane @ Jun 17 2005, 10:56 PM)Als... Jun 30 2005, 08:55 PM sweetxsimplicity It seems like too much trouble.
Especially if it... Jun 16 2005, 03:58 PM Rachel is love It is not just for the sex forum idiot. Jun 16 2005, 04:17 PM racoons > you no, it isnt.
its for the visitor tracker too, plu... Jun 16 2005, 04:23 PM mzkandi QUOTE(MarchHare2UrAlice @ Jun 16 2005, 5:23 P... Jun 16 2005, 04:29 PM xcaitlinx i don't think that the whole "endorsement... Jun 16 2005, 04:24 PM racoons > you i didnt mean endorsement as in having to write out... Jun 16 2005, 04:31 PM xcaitlinx QUOTE(MarchHare2UrAlice @ Jun 16 2005, 4:31 P... Jun 16 2005, 06:18 PM autumn. QUOTE(caytexo @ Jun 16 2005, 7:18 PM)are you ... Jun 16 2005, 07:58 PM xcaitlinx QUOTE(autumn. @ Jun 16 2005, 7:58 PM)no, i do... Jun 17 2005, 03:15 PM basick this is a BRILLIANT idea...
i registered in the ... Jun 16 2005, 04:33 PM lbjshaq2345 i didnt start posting for 2 weeks after my account... Jun 16 2005, 04:35 PM racoons > you well, yes.
this applies to people who have MONTHS... Jun 16 2005, 04:37 PM Heathasm i agree with the first post. i never had the probl... Jun 17 2005, 01:12 AM racoons > you yeah cayte, i was talking about yours
again, your... Jun 17 2005, 05:39 AM Spiritual Winged Aura That means, we will have less people interested in... Jun 17 2005, 04:19 PM william ^why would we have less people interested? that ma... Jun 17 2005, 06:32 PM sammi rules you mzkandi, go to english class.
(i'm just joki... Jun 17 2005, 10:05 PM Azarel Sorry about bringing the thread back to life, I mu... Jun 30 2005, 03:11 PM wayne QUOTE(Azarel @ Jun 30 2005, 3:11 PM)How ironi... Jun 30 2005, 04:03 PM sammi rules you ^ i don't. i don't think i've even eq... Jun 30 2005, 06:38 PM Frankie ^ me. actually, whenever i post in introductions, ... Jun 30 2005, 06:46 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: