The Bible?, historical acocunt or a political agenda |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
The Bible?, historical acocunt or a political agenda |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
we all know this book. we've at least seen it in hotel rooms. this is the book with tissue-thin pages, the book that was first printed. this is a book that people rally to.
and it is a political agenda. in the early years of christianity, there were many, many sects that called themselves chistian. one sect decided they were the real christians, and condemned the rest as false sects. this sect evolved into the church. In order to make all other sects wrong, they edited the bible. they threw out the parts they didn't like, added parts they liked. The bible is a manual for how to live your life- so, why not add in a bit about who you should give money to? over the years, the bible evolved as it's editors saw fit. It was changed, in the case of the king james bible, to help conquer ireland. It was rewritten to support values the political leaders wanted supported. want a reason to allow slavery? put in a bit about cain and able. want to be able to get precious farmlands in the middle east? put in a bit about that being the holy land. the bible, it seems, is nothing more than a written propoganda tool; too far edited from it's original text to be considered anything more than a pamplet that's designed, not to ensure truth of history, and that all sides are protrayed, but to get the godless heathens to convert to christianity. now; you can either flame me and tell me how i couldn't understand, and cite bible quotes and give me something to laugh at, or you can prove me wrong with a bit of rational debate. i'd enjoy it emmensly more if you'd pick the first one, although the second is nice. have a nice day! |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
ghandi goes to hell?
darwin goes to hell? galelio goes to hell? you know, hell sounds like a better place; considering hitler goes to heaven the crusaders go to heaven timothy mcvegh goes to heaven. you know what, i want to go to hell |
|
|
*kryogenix* |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Jun 12 2005, 9:22 PM) ghandi goes to hell? darwin goes to hell? galelio goes to hell? you know, hell sounds like a better place; considering hitler goes to heaven the crusaders go to heaven timothy mcvegh goes to heaven. you know what, i want to go to hell I don't think you're understanding this the right way. Read my sig. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." -John 3:16 Who is the true follower of Christ, the man who preaches non-violence or the man who commits genocide? |
|
|
*suddenly she* |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(kryogenix @ Jun 16 2005, 4:24 PM) I don't think you're understanding this the right way. Read my sig. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." -John 3:16 Who is the true follower of Christ, the man who preaches non-violence or the man who commits genocide? that's a great verse, but what does it have to do with anything at the moment? i think we should have your question a bit altered. who is the true follower of Christ, the non-christian man who preaches non-violence or the christian man who commits genocide? do you think God judges a person based on his/her best or worst deed? i don't really have an opinion yet on the question i just wrote. actually, maybe i do. He might judge on what your intentions were. i don't know, because i can't explain the mind that created the world. 26 If a righteous man turns from his righteousness and commits sin, he will die for it; because of the sin he has committed he will die. 27 But if a wicked man turns away from the wickedness he has committed and does what is just and right, he will save his life. -ezekiel 18:26-27, niv. source: biblegateway.com i guess that says it. 9 He follows my decrees and faithfully keeps my laws. That man is righteous; he will surely live, declares the Sovereign LORD. -ezekiel 18:9, niv. source: biblegateway.com what are his decrees and laws? the ten commandments, all that stuff about not murdering people, having mercy and so on. from what i can see, ghandi followed them. if following God was included, then i have no idea. my head hurts from thinking. sorry if i'm screwing up the debate. ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |