Retirement, When? |
Debate Rules
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
- Topics are not to bash others.
- Immature behaviors/comments will not be tolerated.
- Please remember, not everyone thinks like you. People have different ways of thinking and different perspectives. Let's respect each other's thoughts and responses.
- PLEASE, search before making new topics--especially popular topics like "God" and "Abortion" etc.
- PLEASE, read through the thread or at least a couple pages before posting. We have to maintain a certain level of maturity in here.
| *paul murphy* |
 Jun 15 2005, 01:48 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest  |
Key Senate Republicans are considering gradually raising the Social Security retirement age as high as 69 over several years as they struggle to jump-start legislation that President Bush has placed atop his second-term agenda, officials said Tuesday.
That is un-fair. I think it should be 60. |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
Jun 16 2005, 11:35 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Member Posts: 124 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 132,526 |
i agree with the person above...65 seems about right, not that many people retire at 60 anyway, and if they are rich enough to retire, then they can just not work for 5 years, or get a easier job
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
paul murphy Retirement Jun 15 2005, 01:48 PM
Spirited Away Interesting, how about telling people why you thin... Jun 15 2005, 01:50 PM
paul murphy QUOTE(uninspiredfae @ Jun 15 2005, 1:50 PM)In... Jun 15 2005, 01:52 PM waitwaitwait I'd say maybe 65.
At 60 these days, people see... Jun 15 2005, 10:48 PM BrandonSaunders The problem with raising retirement in the African... Jun 16 2005, 12:55 PM XoJennaoX 60....not everyone has a sit on there butt all day... Jun 19 2005, 08:51 AM not_for_anything people dont HAVE to work, they can probably get un... Jun 19 2005, 10:47 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: