Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

Shipping Babies Abroad, foreigners adopting US babies
Spirited Away
post Jun 11 2005, 05:45 PM
Post #1


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



So I skimmed over an article titled "Why are American Babies being ADOPTED ABROAD" in People Magazine's June publication and it strikes me as odd.

Many Europeans and Canadians wish to parent African Amerian babies and have been adopting them for years now, but a lot of us just haven't been noticing or thought about the possibility much. How do you feel about it?

According to the article, the defense for sending these kids overseas has to do with our country's "racial politics" and that there is an "adoption hierarchy" that places White children at the top and Black children at the bottom. In other countries, however, it seems these children are in demand.

Now, what's the problem? Our government may "ratify an international treaty that would require adoption agencies to make every effort to place children in their birth countries before allowing them to go abroad". Why? Many people feel that international adoption is "covert racism". Another article online says Whites adopting Blacks babies is a form of "cultural genocide".

My question is do you, or do you not, agree with such a treaty?



How do I feel about it? Tom Hanks says it best: "Make peace where it is precious. Help plant trees. Help embrace diversity and celebrate difference..."

I think all these kids need are loving homes. If they can't find this home in the US, then they must be able to find it elsewhere, or at least, they must have the choice to find it elsewhere. Indeed there is a cultural setback and I recognize this very valid point. However, a loving home includes understanding parents. These children will grow up. They will be curious. They will ask questions. HOWEVER, they will know. How can it be possible to hide or lie about skin color? They will learn who they are. Their heritage will not be lost to them. The US will not be lost to them. The only way it can happen is if they don't want to learn.
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
madchenallein
post Jun 14 2005, 07:12 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 58
Joined: May 2005
Member No: 139,806



I read that article, I found it very interesting and I hadn't known that was happening either. I don't have children personally. I am actually voluntarily sterilized. It was a decision I made after several years of research and introspection. There are so many children out there who need good homes, that if I ever change my mind, my husband and I decided before the operation not to try to reverse it, but to adopt a baby. The way I see it, if someone is irresponsible enough to get pregnant when she can't keep the baby, then whoever is willing and eager to take the child and give it a good, loving home should be allowed to have it. Concerns about culture and race are definitely secondary, especially if you're measuring against Maslow's heirarchy of needs, which is pretty much the first concern. Once the baby is old enough, if it's skin color is different, it will start asking questions. People who object to interracial adoption should shut up or put up if they object that strongly, there wouldn't BE a problem if they'd take care of their own, red, yellow, black, white, green, WHATEVER.
 

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: