Nintendo's status, uh-oh |
Nintendo's status, uh-oh |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() my username sucks ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 264 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,493 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Wow, i dont know whats going on... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,439 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 10,977 ![]() |
Ok, you guys, It all comes down to the people really. Nintendo can be the best company on the block, but it wouldn't matter if everyone skipped them and went to a different company. Think about, the hardware and brand names only contribute so much. It comes down the to audience.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() samurai champloo! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 748 Joined: Dec 2003 Member No: 2 ![]() |
QUOTE(uLoVeMikeRoch @ Jun 12 2005, 11:05 PM) Ok, you guys, It all comes down to the people really. Nintendo can be the best company on the block, but it wouldn't matter if everyone skipped them and went to a different company. Think about, the hardware and brand names only contribute so much. It comes down the to audience. What? So what about the audience? Are you saying Nintendo doesn't have an audience? ![]() Haha, I'm just really trying to understand your post. You could argue all three other ways: It wouldn't matter if everyone skipped (choose one:)Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo to go to a different company, that (chosen) company would go down. Hardware and 'brand name'(I'm guessing you mean games?) does obviously contribute a lot, that's how a company get its audience. This post has been edited by nas: Jun 12 2005, 10:25 PM |
|
|
![]() ![]() |