ipod mini or creative zen? Options

[sweetxsimplicity]

..i'm not good with all this technology and pros and cons stuff, and i dunno which to get and who to believe. some people are like "omg only posers have ipods!!" and some people are like "ipods are wayy better than those mp3 players!" help me decide.

well, anyway, these are my pros and cons

mini: nicer, not many features, costs $100 to get replace battery
zen: uglier, a few more features, costs $40 to replace battery, UGLIER (<-- thats what im most concerned about, lol. ><)

[wayne]

dude wtf. they do do the same thing. wtf do yo think the main reason of owning an mp3 player is? for music you stupid f**k...

and you are on apple's d**k... obviously your the stupid one. what about hte people who owned an ipod before they got popular? did they get them because of some trend? no they didnt. and there are still people out there who get ipods not for trends, because its an mp3 pkayer and thats the one they know the best.

and how is iriver not bceomming a trend? theres f**king tons of people who praise the iriver just as those who go crazy over the ipod so dont start. cause ur one of them...

if an ipod is what somebody wants.. then thats what they get. who cares about the other players out. woh the hell cares if the creative 50931223hgh or whatever can send alien transmissions, or if the iriver 093u8kladsjfklaj can make bacon... just like i said in another htread. i buy an mp3 player to play music. if i already have a digi cam and i video player, why do i need my mp3 player to do this? I ALREADY HAVE IT... and the quality of some of the things these mp3 players do extra suck half the time. do you really think im gonig to get outstanding quality photo's out of an mp3 player thats under 200-250 bucks? when the great quality camera's cost that much and more? who is going to sell something that does all of that for so cheap? sure it might be cheap and do all of those things.. but there are some bad drawbacks... little screens, poor color, limited settings, etc... so now what do i have to find out?... i know about iriver's little mp3 player that plays video's. and to tell you the truth, the ipod get higher ratings than almost all the players out...

apple ipod photo:
http://reviews.cnet.com/Apple_iPod_Photo__...83.html?tag=pop


iriver h340:
http://reviews.cnet.com/iRiver_H340_40GB/4...l?tag=pdtl-list

creative zen touch:
http://reviews.cnet.com/Creative_Zen_Touch...506.html?tag=bv



yes.. i can compare also... not that hard...


and suck on iriver? yes keep sucking cause it seems you havent been sucking hard enough.. cause ipods are still better... dumb shit...

[uLoVeMikeRoch]

dude wtf. they do do the same thing. wtf do yo think the main reason of owning an mp3 player is? for music you stupid f**k...

and you are on apple's d**k... obviously your the stupid one. what about hte people who owned an ipod before they got popular? did they get them because of some trend? no they didnt. and there are still people out there who get ipods not for trends, because its an mp3 pkayer and thats the one they know the best.

and how is iriver not bceomming a trend? theres f**king tons of people who praise the iriver just as those who go crazy over the ipod so dont start. cause ur one of them...

if an ipod is what somebody wants.. then thats what they get. who cares about the other players out. woh the hell cares if the creative 50931223hgh or whatever can send alien transmissions, or if the iriver 093u8kladsjfklaj can make bacon... just like i said in another htread. i buy an mp3 player to play music. if i already have a digi cam and i video player, why do i need my mp3 player to do this? I ALREADY HAVE IT... and the quality of some of the things these mp3 players do extra suck half the time. do you really think im gonig to get outstanding quality photo's out of an mp3 player thats under 200-250 bucks? when the great quality camera's cost that much and more? who is going to sell something that does all of that for so cheap? sure it might be cheap and do all of those things.. but there are some bad drawbacks... little screens, poor color, limited settings, etc... so now what do i have to find out?... i know about iriver's little mp3 player that plays video's. and to tell you the truth, the ipod get higher ratings than almost all the players out...

apple ipod photo:
http://reviews.cnet.com/Apple_iPod_Photo__...83.html?tag=pop
iriver h340:
http://reviews.cnet.com/iRiver_H340_40GB/4...l?tag=pdtl-list

creative zen touch:
http://reviews.cnet.com/Creative_Zen_Touch...506.html?tag=bv
yes.. i can compare also... not that hard...
and suck on iriver? yes keep sucking cause it seems you havent been sucking hard enough.. cause ipods are still better... dumb shit...

Wow. hahaha, it makes me laugh, how hard you try. But really, your still wrong. And yeah battery is replacable. But after the warranty you are scrwed.

Ha, cnet? I never trust Cnet anymore. After that stupid high score they gave to the ipod.

The iRiver is only becoming popular, because most of them hate iPods. They supporr iriver because the iRiver actually works.

Stop trying, you know you are wrong.

Im so offended by your childish remarks. Please grow up. Cb does not need anymore pre-teen, pre-pubecent little kids.

Also, you missed the whole point. I just commented on the extra little features that the other mp3's can do shiteater. I never said about how good they were. Brianna , if you wanna get a shit mp3 player like the iPod, be my guest. I just wanna help you make a wise decision. Go for the Creative Zen, because thats your other choice. Hell if you dont like that anymore, go for iRiver, m:robe or anyother company.

Just remember, when it breaks, dont blame me.

Wayne, you're still a dumbass.