AWOL., alcohol w/o liquid |
Debate Rules
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
- Topics are not to bash others.
- Immature behaviors/comments will not be tolerated.
- Please remember, not everyone thinks like you. People have different ways of thinking and different perspectives. Let's respect each other's thoughts and responses.
- PLEASE, search before making new topics--especially popular topics like "God" and "Abortion" etc.
- PLEASE, read through the thread or at least a couple pages before posting. We have to maintain a certain level of maturity in here.
 May 11 2005, 09:42 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow  Group: Member Posts: 3,316 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 37,142  |
i just saw the news and they talked about AWOL. alcohol without liquid. sounds interesting doesnt it. well british scientists engineered it and its getting pretty popular. infact a club in NY uses it. it oxidates the alcohol making it easier to go down and much faster to get the effects of one shot. it doesnt hurt. but this brings up many questions.. is it safe? could underaged kids use it? side effects.... but this is all i have heard ,and this sounds interesting... but it is questionable.. do you think this will revolutionize the standard limits of drinking.... i remind you the effects happen faster than regular alcohol. and it is also less calories so its also less filling. ....
OFFICIAL AWOL SITE so what do you think about it.. |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
May 11 2005, 11:25 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 i'm hot. you're hot. but she's not. Group: Member Posts: 27 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 87,896 |
ohh wow. that can't be any good. think of all the problems it would cause! I mean we already have enough problems with alcoholics. We don't really need AWOL. I blieve AA ((alcoholics-anon.)) already has enough members.
 I can only think of negatives that could come from AWOL.  Anybody have any postitives? 
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
May 12 2005, 03:07 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(LiLBabe91800 @ May 11 2005, 11:25 PM) ohh wow. that can't be any good. think of all the problems it would cause! I mean we already have enough problems with alcoholics. We don't really need AWOL. I blieve AA ((alcoholics-anon.)) already has enough members. I can only think of negatives that could come from AWOL. Anybody have any postitives?  the thing is, this stuff takes a lot longer to get you drunk that regular cans of beer. So to get drunk, you'd have to be inhaling this stuff for a while. |
|
|
|
|
May 12 2005, 07:17 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow Group: Member Posts: 3,316 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 37,142 |
QUOTE(kryogenix @ May 12 2005, 3:07 PM) the thing is, this stuff takes a lot longer to get you drunk that regular cans of beer. So to get drunk, you'd have to be inhaling this stuff for a while. no its a lot faster. the news reporter bought one and put a shot of whiskey and gave it to her friend and he inhaled some and he felt the effects like less than 5 minutes later. and it was only one shot. QUOTE(XoJennaoX @ May 12 2005, 9:07 AM) And not to mention after a person uses it somebody else comes and puts their mouth on it! disgusting. i think they have interchangeable tubes . that would be really unsanitary. yea not to mention it is kind of bulky. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
pandamonium AWOL. May 11 2005, 09:42 PM
XoJennaoX QUOTE(kryogenix @ May 12 2005, 3:07 PM)the th... May 12 2005, 03:37 PM XoJennaoX oh i watched a whole program on this about a year ... May 12 2005, 09:07 AM Frankie i think that is still just as bad as regular alcoh... May 12 2005, 04:55 PM Spirited Away The only difference between this inhaler and alcoh... May 13 2005, 02:09 PM
pandamonium QUOTE(uninspiredfae @ May 13 2005, 2:09 PM)Th... May 14 2005, 08:31 PM Spirited Away QUOTE(pandamonium @ May 14 2005, 8:31 PM)AWOL... May 14 2005, 09:40 PM not_for_anything So you inhale it? Wouldnt it cause damage like coc... Jun 9 2005, 01:31 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: