Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

World peace, what do you think?
rOckThISshYt
post May 3 2005, 03:11 PM
Post #1


Live Your Own Party
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,261
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,489



Sorry if there's already a topic on this.

Well, our school news paper is writing an article on the Miss America pagent. (Why? I don't know. ermm.gif ) It got into the whole world peace thing and how no matter what, all the women say they want world peace. This is what I had to say about that...

I highly doubt that's what those woman want. They're too worried about their hair to actually care about the rest of the world. I mean, I'm sure some do. But the majority.. I doubt it. _dry.gif Plus, anyone who says world peace is good for the world doesn't look into it enough.

I think there are way too many wars going on in the world about the stupidest thing. But some wars are important for the world. Without it, there'd be absolutly no evolution. I'm talking about society's evolution. Look at it this way:

Think of the Romans. Do you honestly thing they would have gotten as technologicly advanced and helped society so much if they hadn't concored all the land? Without some wars, no one would have gotten any where. Period. Rome wouldn't have turned into the Roman empire and wouldn't have gotten so far and so many other things that have helped today's society. You must look much farther into war than death and misery. Without it, we wouldn't be Americans. It's a way of human progress. And that's a fact.


So, let me know what you think while I go take my shower. tongue.gif
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
*kryogenix*
post May 5 2005, 09:39 PM
Post #2





Guest






QUOTE(rOckThISshYt @ May 5 2005, 9:20 PM)
Oh yeah. I have something else to say to that post. Even if your logic did actually make sense (which it definatly doesn't) then it still wouldn't be good because without the freedoms we have now, there might be peace but people would be unhappy. Happiness should be the goal. That would be the closest thing to world peace we could ever reach, I think. In order to be happy, we need our freedom. Period.
*


what good is freedom without life? doesn't the right to live outweigh all other freedoms?
 
rOckThISshYt
post May 5 2005, 10:18 PM
Post #3


Live Your Own Party
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,261
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,489



QUOTE(kryogenix @ May 5 2005, 10:39 PM)
what good is freedom without life? doesn't the right to live outweigh all other freedoms?
*


Oh, of course! But, like I have said many times before, people are going to terrorize no matter what the law is. Just because the laws are more strict, won't stop the people that are that serious about terrorism from terrorizing. Some people die for their radical causes. For example, dammit.... I can't think of the word right now. Suicidal bombings and so on. When people will strap themselves to a bomb just to kill up to hundreds of other peopld. That obviously is against the law. But has that ever stopped them? I think not. stubborn.gif
 

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: