Any thoughts on the Schiavo case? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Any thoughts on the Schiavo case? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Running ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 596 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 96,064 ![]() |
woman fell into "vegatative state" 15 years ago now they wanna pull the feeding tube outta her... Experts say that parts of her brain is like "muss" Her husband wants to but her family dosent... The husband already has a new family with children...
I cant really explain it that well but heres a timeline Timeline This post has been edited by hosing: Feb 26 2005, 08:01 PM |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() ¢¾ Wanting it. ¢¾ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,060 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 39,234 ![]() |
It is very wrong. The husband, who gained a million dollars off of court cases, has a girlfriend and two children. Now, why should he have a say on her life. the law says that when you are married the spouse has legal care of your condition if you are injured. that's the problem... the law is the problem. why let her die when there's hope?
some q&a's from her site If Terri hasn't recovered after all these years of therapy, why not let go? Terri hasn't had meaningful therapy since 1991, but many credible physicians say she can benefit from it. Why can't Terri just divorce? Terri's husband/guardian speaks for her. She cannot divorce without his permission Does Terri have an advanced directive or any wishes about her healthcare? Terri never signed any directive or living will and there is no evidence that she foresaw her present situation. Why do Terri's family fight to keep her alive? Shouldn't they let her husband decide? Terri's husband has started another family and probably has gone on with his life. Terri's family want to provide her therapy and a safe home. Is Terri receiving life support? Not in the traditional sense. Terri only receives food and fluids via a simple tube. Isn't removing her tube a natural and dignified way to die? No. Dehydration and starvation cause horrific effects and are anything but peaceful. Read more here. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() i've never wanted anything rationale. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 ![]() |
QUOTE(Angel_Cece @ Mar 24 2005, 6:40 PM) It is very wrong. The husband, who gained a million dollars off of court cases, has a girlfriend and two children. Now, why should he have a say on her life. the law says that when you are married the spouse has legal care of your condition if you are injured. that's the problem... the law is the problem. why let her die when there's hope? because there is NO HOPE. what dont you people understand? she has been BRAIN-f**kin-DEAD for 15 years. numerous doctors have said there is NOTHING that can bring her back. she can't feel anything, she can't talk, she can't respond...anything that her body does is just like natural or something, it is not because she can know when her family is with her. the husband wants to move on because he has finally accepted that she is gone and that it is what he needs to do. she told him TWICE that if she was ever in any sort of vegetive state that she would want to die naturally. he is simply complying with her wishes. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |