supreme court ruling, for those that support the death penalty |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
supreme court ruling, for those that support the death penalty |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() This bitch better work! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,681 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 28,095 ![]() |
i heard last night that the supreme court made a new ruling that minors that commit a crime cannot be sentenced to the death penalty. it is effecting 19 states. (i think). i, personally, think that is not right. their age has nothing to do with wheter they should get the penalty or not. because of this new ruling, 9 criminals are going to be free men (in texas).
![]() ![]() --- what do you think of this? |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Sig Gunner ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 30 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 109,833 ![]() |
Even a thirteen year old knows that theres no coming back from death and that killing others is wrong, especially nowadays with tv and the internet. The bible did not say "thou shalt not kill", it said "thou shalt not murder".
To save even more on cost, we should use firing squads, it's humane, effective, painless, and does not destory many organs. The best part is that the bullet cost bout 50 cents or less. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
QUOTE(DizBukHahNi @ Mar 9 2005, 5:09 PM) Even a thirteen year old knows that theres no coming back from death and that killing others is wrong, especially nowadays with tv and the internet. The bible did not say "thou shalt not kill", it said "thou shalt not murder". To save even more on cost, we should use firing squads, it's humane, effective, painless, and does not destory many organs. The best part is that the bullet cost bout 50 cents or less. 50 cents or less? are these BBs you're talking about? the cost is not in the execution. it's because death row inmates are allowed many appeals, at the cost of the state. |
|
|
*CrackedRearView* |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Mar 9 2005, 5:19 PM) I've already pointed out the solution to this in my post. EDIT: Here's a situation. A man kills 15 people in a bombing, check. The man goes to prison for life without parole, check. 60 years in prison times $60,000 = $3,600,000, check. (Now, this is one inmate in pool of hundreds of thousands of people sentenced to life) Now, here's another situation. A man kills 15 people in a bombing, check. The man is sentenced to death, and I'm the U.S. Representative from Kansas who passed the bill that disallows such lenient appeals, check. That very same week, the man gets his $200.00 injection, check. So -- recap: LIFE IMPRISONMENT: Decades, millions. MY PROPOSAL: Weeks/Months, hundreds. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |