Apple Ipod, overpriced brick or good buy? Options

[sadolakced acid]

sure, there are threads in the technology forum about ipods; but none specifically for debating.

so here's the setup:

the apple ipod is the most popular portable music player in the United States. the word ipod has become synonomous with a hard drive device, like xerox because synonymous with copy machine.

However; the ipod was not the first MP3 player. They were not the first Hard drive player. The only thing that the ipod had that others didn't was the scroll wheel.

basically; the ipod was, and still is, priced higher than other similar competitors.

yet is the reason why it dominates is that it is actually a good portable music player, or is it becuase of clever advertising, it's status as a status symbol, and the mass stupidity of many?

[sadolakced acid]

and why would you trust ipod more than iriver? this is a debate; please try to use facts.


the iriver h340 costs $400 (list).

the ipod photo 40 gb cost 459.99 (list). add 50 bucks for recording (although still no line in) and 50 bucks for FM tuner, and you have something costing 550 dollars. buy a 30 buck case, and your $ 30charger (which isn't included anymore) and you have something costing a nice 610 bucks.

did i mention the river can play videos?

the iriver also comes with a one year warrenty, and they replace it if something happens.

so why do you trust ipod more than iriver? brand name? iriver tells you that thier battery will run down in about 5 years if you constantly charge and discharge it. Does ipod tell you that ater 3 or so years of mederate use, the battery must be replaced BY THEM? for lots of money? the iriver one can be replaced by anyone. for the cost of the battery.

so why do you trust ipod?