Log In · Register

 
reebok is gone, read this
Hell-Rell
post Aug 6 2005, 11:37 AM
Post #1


4/5th of all people do not understand fractions.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 735
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 169,498



addidas but out reebok for 3.8billion dollars

QUOTE
Frankfurt — Adidas-Salomon AG said Wednesday that it will buy shoemaker Reebok International Ltd. in a $3.8-billion (U.S.) deal, giving the company about 20 per cent of the U.S. market and putting it in a position to better challenge leader Nike Inc.

Under the terms of the deal, Adidas will pay $59 a share for all of Reebok's outstanding shares, a premium of 34 per cent.

The deal is subject to regulatory approval in the United States and Europe as well as by shareholders. Both companies said the transaction could close during the first half of 2006.

“Today's announcement represents a major strategic milestone for our group,” said Adidas-Salomon chairman and chief executive officer Herbert Hainer. “This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to combine two of the most respected and well-known companies in the worldwide sporting goods industry.”

Advertisements





Reebok will continue to operate under its own name and its headquarters will remain in Canton, Mass., the companies said. Adidas said it did not expect any significant reductions in the work forces of the companies in the aftermath of the acquisition.

Mr. Hainer said the combined company would mean an expanded reach globally, with a sharp push into North America.

“With Reebok, we are advancing our position on the playing field of the sporting goods industry and are improving our financial strength to drive increased shareholder value,” he said. “We have long respected Paul Fireman and his team for what they have accomplished at Reebok, and we expect them to be an important part of our group as we bring these two world class organizations together.”

Reebok chairman and CEO Paul Fireman said the deal would bring a synergy to the market for sportswear and apparel and put the company on track to take on Nike directly, among others.

“As an aspirational global sports performance and lifestyle brand, Reebok's mission is to enroll global youth through sports, music and technology. This complements Adidas' mission to be the leading sports brand in the world with a focus on performance and international presence,” he said.

The deal brings together two impressive stables of athletes and entertainment endorsers. English soccer star David Beckham and rap artist Missy Elliott are under contract to Adidas.

Reebok in February launched the “I am what I am” marketing campaign, which features pitches from celebrity entertainers and athletes in an effort to draw younger buyers who regard sneakers as high fashion. One of the ads featuring the rapper 50 Cent was pulled in March amid complaints that it glorified gun violence.

Reebok said its second-quarter profit soared 71 per cent on strong sales driven by its high-performance model shoes and the new marketing campaign. The announcement came as Herzogenaurach-based Adidas posted a 30-per-cent gain in second-quarter profit and improved sales.
 
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 22)
xx_Fashionista_x...
post Aug 6 2005, 11:47 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 195,043



Man, I use to love reebok
 
*mzkandi*
post Aug 6 2005, 11:49 AM
Post #3





Guest






Well thats alot of money, I dont own any reeboks so not really much of a loss to me
 
Trolling
post Aug 6 2005, 12:07 PM
Post #4


Running
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 596
Joined: Feb 2005
Member No: 96,064



Reebok was like a poor mans nike... Couldnt stand rbk and they looked cheap too
 
jnukes
post Aug 6 2005, 03:02 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,172
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 34,045



I thought it was 4.4 billion dollars .
 
maia_dc
post Aug 6 2005, 03:05 PM
Post #6


it's our chemistry
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,151
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,775



I never liked reebok anyway. mellow.gif
 
Paradox of Life
post Aug 6 2005, 03:12 PM
Post #7


My name's Katt. Nice to meet you!
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,826
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 93,674



Yeah. Reebok wasn't so great.
 
*danielle_x3*
post Aug 6 2005, 05:13 PM
Post #8





Guest






bye bye reebok. :| even though i never had any of their sneakers, i'll miss seeing your commercials.
 
*Statistik*
post Aug 6 2005, 07:54 PM
Post #9





Guest






I have a reebok sneaker sad.gif oh well..good bye _smile.gif
 
lbjshaq2345
post Aug 7 2005, 12:12 AM
Post #10


Lil JC
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 868
Joined: May 2005
Member No: 145,741



omfg all i have is like reebok and nike are they still gonna make shoes our are they out of it period no more g-units? iversons? s. carters? wat about all their NBA apparel? WTF IS WRONG WITH REEBOK
 
toodlepops.
post Aug 7 2005, 06:23 AM
Post #11


boo
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 5,512
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 71,765



noooooooooo!
I loved Reebok. Better than Adidas, I must say
 
miss barnes
post Aug 7 2005, 07:54 PM
Post #12


RiKACHANtEL
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,876
Joined: Sep 2004
Member No: 51,230



uumm...reebok isnt gone..just adidas owns them
 
Shana_Kru
post Aug 7 2005, 07:57 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 192
Joined: May 2005
Member No: 142,578



Reeboks the shit!!! I HearT ReeBok
 
mai_z
post Aug 8 2005, 02:08 PM
Post #14


unify and defeat... divide and crumble
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,759
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 6,379



miss barnes is right, chances are, the consumer won't even notice the change. It'll probably only affect stockholders.
 
turbulent
post Aug 8 2005, 02:11 PM
Post #15


I intend to live forever-so far, so good.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,820
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 115,137



i probably wouldnt of noticed the change

i own a pair of reebok classic shoes which i love so much. they are my favourite, cant believe they sold out to addidas
 
ikayto
post Aug 8 2005, 03:23 PM
Post #16


Assistant Manager of Personal
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,101
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 26,922



That's okay i guess. Reebok and Adidas don't make very fashionable shoes, i only know they're good for competition.

Maybe now they can make some decent shoes.
 
EXPLO5ION
post Aug 8 2005, 03:34 PM
Post #17


A.K.A. Simplicityxx
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,878
Joined: Oct 2004
Member No: 56,813



I never really wore any reebok shoes, so it doesn't really affect me.
 
Eryi
post Aug 8 2005, 03:42 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 4,591
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 77,305



Adidas was waay better than Reebok, hooray no more reebok.
 
LiLEthiopian
post Aug 8 2005, 11:43 PM
Post #19


jonathan rhys meyers.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 954
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 33,013



I'm an Adidas fan...and I never really liked Reebok..so I guess this is a good thing.
 
Teesa
post Aug 8 2005, 11:45 PM
Post #20


crushed.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 9,432
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 20,026



AW. cry.gif

oh, well, I never had Reebok shoes anyway :)
 
pinklove_stains
post Aug 9 2005, 11:46 AM
Post #21


I am tako <3.
****

Group: Member
Posts: 172
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 174,052



reebok wasn't THAT bad, but addidas yeah looks much better with our outfits.
 
Hell-Rell
post Aug 10 2005, 05:16 PM
Post #22


4/5th of all people do not understand fractions.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 735
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 169,498



R.I.P
Reebok
cry.gif cry.gif
 
datass
post Aug 10 2005, 10:53 PM
Post #23


(′ ・ω・`)
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,179
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 72,477



i never see reebok's adverts, i wouldnt have known it if my classmate werent wearing them...they were so great.
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: