Log In · Register

 
unique concepts of dna, more of a kind
*Statistik*
post Jun 1 2005, 06:17 PM
Post #1





Guest






DNA identification can be quite effective if used intelligently. Portions of the DNA sequence that vary the most among humans must be used; also, portions must be large enough to overcome the fact that human mating is not absolutely random.

Consider the scenario of a crime scene investigation . . .

Assume that type O blood is found at the crime scene. Type O occurs in about 45% of Americans. If investigators type only for ABO, then finding that the "suspect" in a crime is type O really doesn't reveal very much.

If, in addition to being type O, the suspect is a blond, and blond hair is found at the crime scene, then you now have two bits of evidence to suggest who really did it. However, there are a lot of Type O blonds out there.

If you find that the crime scene has footprints from a pair of Nike Air Jordans (with a distinctive tread design) and the suspect, in addition to being type O and blond, is also wearing Air Jordans with the same tread design, then you are much closer to linking the suspect with the crime scene.

In this way, by accumulating bits of linking evidence in a chain, where each bit by itself isn't very strong but the set of all of them together is very strong, you can argue that your suspect really is the right person.
 
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 8)
*Azarel*
post Jun 1 2005, 06:19 PM
Post #2





Guest






So what's your point? What we think of it? huh.gif
 
EmmalieV
post Jun 1 2005, 06:22 PM
Post #3


insanitys contagious.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,210
Joined: Feb 2005
Member No: 99,707



Um , well this topic has no point and question , I learned all of that from CSI already.
 
soulless727
post Jun 1 2005, 07:44 PM
Post #4


former member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 122,339



next time please cite your source or else it is plagiarism
The Site that should be Cited

Thanks
 
Levy2k6
post Jun 1 2005, 08:15 PM
Post #5


Word.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,004
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 34,673



plagarism.. haha..

anyways.. whats the point of the thread?

i though everybody knew that? dont ppl watch CSI? Law and Order? Monk? and all those crazy shows
 
soulless727
post Jun 1 2005, 08:18 PM
Post #6


former member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 122,339



QUOTE(Levy2k6 @ Jun 1 2005, 8:15 PM)
plagarism.. haha..

anyways.. whats the point of the thread?

i though everybody knew that? dont ppl watch CSI? Law and Order? Monk? and all those crazy shows
*

monk? hmmm never heard of that....heard of csi and law and order but i hardly watch tv...
 
*basick*
post Jun 1 2005, 08:21 PM
Post #7





Guest






Nice copy and pasting. Here's a tip jason, if you wanted us to believe you maybe you shouldn't have made threads such as "I Hate My Mother". wink.gif

So... uh what do you want us to say about the article?
 
_sarcastic_
post Jun 1 2005, 10:24 PM
Post #8


<3
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,657
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 64,493



you're copying and pasting this for us is because....
 
gelionie
post Jun 3 2005, 08:50 AM
Post #9


say maydayism.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,447
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 26,344



Ehhh... don't we all know this already?

I thought it would be something new, but blah...
 

Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: