turn for the worse? |
Debate Rules
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
- Topics are not to bash others.
- Immature behaviors/comments will not be tolerated.
- Please remember, not everyone thinks like you. People have different ways of thinking and different perspectives. Let's respect each other's thoughts and responses.
- PLEASE, search before making new topics--especially popular topics like "God" and "Abortion" etc.
- PLEASE, read through the thread or at least a couple pages before posting. We have to maintain a certain level of maturity in here.
 Feb 25 2005, 04:49 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 WWMD?! - i am from the age of BM 2  Group: Member Posts: 5,308 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,848  |
the only 2 democratic advisors to president bush have left/are leaving the office. is this a turn for the worse, or the better? will democratic views still be considered? if not, will it really cause that much conflict? how much will the views and laws made differ?
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 7)
|
Feb 25 2005, 11:55 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 This bitch better work! Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,681 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 28,095 |
i think that if all the advisors to president bush are republican, than i think that all democratic views will be discounted and they will probably just go with republic choices. it might noe be that much of a bad thing for republicans but as for democrats, they will probably hate it.
|
|
|
|
| *Kathleen* |
Feb 26 2005, 04:44 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
Eep - why did they leave?
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2005, 04:49 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
the republicans control every branch of gov...
the only thing the dems have is filibuster power in the senate. when everyone is a yes-man, things go bad. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2005, 04:57 PM
Post
#5
|
|
 Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
indeed. bush needs some kind of resonable advise
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2005, 11:23 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
WWMD?! - i am from the age of BM 2 Group: Member Posts: 5,308 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,848 |
QUOTE(Kathleen @ Feb 26 2005, 3:44 PM) Eep - why did they leave?  one just didn't like being there i guess, and one was only recruited for one thing and is leaving after he finishes (helping with bush's education plan). i don't think either of them like being surrounded by people they don't agree with. |
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Feb 27 2005, 11:32 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Guest |
i guess it could be good if they do a good job of placing replacements. i suppose that since we still have the same president for the next 4 years, it may make some people happy to see some changes
of course, i know practically nothing about this... |
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2005, 01:13 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
It is tradition that in that a new president in wartime appoints a bi-partisan cabinet, becuase the country is more important than partisan politics. this way, the president gets more moderation and opposing views...
and bush has done this... Harding is historically called the worst president. Bush is a clear contender. ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner! (actually not. I'll research Harding later and compare him to Bush in another post. no time now.) |
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: