Omg... New Evo VIII Domestic killer... |
 Feb 21 2005, 01:39 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Running  Group: Member Posts: 596 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 96,064  |
Inline-4
1997.00 cc | 121.9 cu in. | 2 L. 276.00 BHP @ 6500.00 RPM 286.00 Ft-lbs @ 3500.00 RPM and stock and its 30k... Me wants one now... But evos are hella ugly -.- |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 21)
|
Feb 21 2005, 04:00 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Element Group: Member Posts: 36 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 103,723 |
if you think the evo8 is great wait til the end of this year the new evo9 should be release. all the goodies of the evo8 MR come standard. HP is bumped up past 300 around 315 - 325 the evo9 looks better then the 8 my main reason for not liking it is the ugly front bumper now its gone has a diferent wing the front fascia has change new back lights looks pretty coolcant wait for it to come out
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2005, 06:42 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Running Group: Member Posts: 596 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 96,064 |
I never like the shape of Evos... But the fact is they come out stock no turbo or nothing... Goodbye to all the import killers for now... I like the Evo Fq-400 cf lip *Drools*
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2005, 11:41 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 speed rac3r Group: Member Posts: 21 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 67,722 |
evo9 is much like the evo8 except,
it's lighter, thus more torque and horsepower.. Ima get myself one.. beats the wrx sti... |
|
|
|
|
Feb 22 2005, 05:20 PM
Post
#5
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 313 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 100,825 |
omggggg
i was in love with evo since forever. the things they can do. wow 
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 22 2005, 05:40 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Running Group: Member Posts: 596 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 96,064 |
Lol I was thinking of putting a evo engine in a Tl... To make up for the craptacular 0-60 and torque on it...
|
|
|
|
| *Programmer* |
Feb 24 2005, 05:21 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Guest |
perrrdy picture......of that model...
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2005, 11:07 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 404 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 89,663 |
wait til i bolt the supercharger on my car and get the bigger trans to handle the extra juice.. we will see who owns who...
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2005, 04:55 PM
Post
#9
|
|
 This bitch better work! Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,681 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 28,095 |
sounds like it has alot of cool stuff. i bet it goes fast!
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 25 2005, 10:24 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 404 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 89,663 |
does now. put so much money into this car its not even funny. looking back this car was kind of slow when bone stock. now it sounds hella lot deeper, goes 0-60 2 seconds faster and gets better gas mileage. now its gonna look even better come thursday when my body kit is installed
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 7 2005, 10:29 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Running Group: Member Posts: 596 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 96,064 |
Your still htting 0-60 in the good 10s... While Evo can hit it in the good 4-5... By the time you hit 60 and your torque kicks in evo will be ahead by a good 10 car lengths
Horsepower 251.00 BHP @ 5600.00 RPM Torque 260.00 Ft-lbs @ 4400.00 RPM<aurora Can you say not even close? 276.00 BHP @ 6500.00 RPM 286.00 Ft-lbs @ 3500.00 RPM< Evo Dont get mad when a stock evo blows past your car... We will see who owns who then |
|
|
|
|
Mar 8 2005, 12:06 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 404 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 89,663 |
Thats a stock aurora you dumb shiyat. Mine pulled the dynojet several times to get a good run at 275bhp and 288 lb-ft of torque. I waited for it to cool with the hood up beofre doing the good run..... Theres also so much more torque because i gutted my airbox and went with a 2 and a quarter inch stainless steel y-pipe.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 8 2005, 01:21 AM
Post
#13
|
|
 Assistant Manager of Personal Group: Member Posts: 1,101 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 26,922 |
but the evo is lighter than your aurora, so you lose my friend
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 8 2005, 02:11 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 404 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 89,663 |
I'd rather have mine as a cruiser/sleeper now........not drive it 60mph through town like these kids do with their ricer Honda's with them big ass gay looking spoilers and weird ground effects. I will use the power when i need it. aT first with the kit, im gonna be driving slow.....hehe. Then ill pick it up once it gets noticed and everyone gets used to it.
Oh and ikayto...try outrunning my dads V8 Supercharged & intercooled 400HP Jaguar S-Type R.... lmfao. http://www.sitaliano.com/RRev.wmv |
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2005, 05:02 PM
Post
#15
|
|
 Pimp Status Group: Member Posts: 640 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,200 |
Yeah man the EVO's are looking awesome these days.... Though Im still a loyal WRX STI fan, i wouldnt mind takin an EVO.... On paper things can look better, but you also gotta realize that the driver has alot to do on how well a car performs
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2005, 05:09 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 404 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 89,663 |
ditto drivers gotta be able to handle the car. these people that get chased by the cops in a high speed pursut have fast cars, but they dont know how to control them.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2005, 07:18 PM
Post
#17
|
|
 t3h koolest guy in cB Group: Member Posts: 2,194 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 513 |
i preffer the old evo's over the new ones. i like the way the older ones look. like hte evo II-V
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2005, 08:48 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Running Group: Member Posts: 596 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 96,064 |
Thats true... But since I don't know anyone with a evo 8... Maybe my freinds freind... Imma have to stick to my figures... Thats all I can use to support my arguement.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 13 2005, 11:16 PM
Post
#19
|
|
 push the botton... VROOOOM Group: Member Posts: 427 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 16,166 |
evo = one crazy ass car
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 13 2005, 11:30 PM
Post
#20
|
|
 durian Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,124 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,860 |
... I hate how the Evo8 looks. But my boyfriend likes the car for reasons beyond my understanding...
 Evo9? There's going to be such a thing?  Yay for eclipse! =X I like curvy cars :P |
|
|
|
|
Mar 14 2005, 09:34 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Running Group: Member Posts: 596 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 96,064 |
I dunno how to read the evo 9s -.-
Torque 400.00 NM @ 3000.00 RPM 4G63 - MIVEC variable valve timing The evo wieghs about 3263 lbs The Aurora wieghs 3960 lbs stock... If you took out seats etc etc.. It still wouldnt be the same as taking seats outta evo... Even if you carbon fibred |
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2005, 10:20 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 404 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 89,663 |
i do not compare my car to evo's or other popcorn machines in terms of power/weight ratio as it is irrelevant. i compare my car to other ppl who race their Lexus IS300's (2 of which i have smoked badly), i owned a supercharged Ford F-150, i owned a Lexus SC430, those type of things. One guy in a Civic Si thought his stock VTEC could beat mine so i raced him. Needless to say he had me til 20mph, and once the northstar V8 does its thing over 4500rpm, he sees the side mirrors..... shouldve seen the look on that kids face LMFAO priceless. Then he did a fly-by once i let off like a sore loser.
an evo, even stock would beat my car badly. I think my car looks better than an Evo. Sport Compacts never appealed to me and i am domestic mustang/camaro kinda guy. I wouldve had gotten that 2001 Mustang GT convertible if it wasnt for the dead auto trans. btw convert that to horsepower and torque in US spec. i dont want to be reading newton meter. thanks |
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: