Certain Members Options

[Knight]

A little someone I know has just crossed the line. He's insulting my site, closing popics I made, and stuff like that. I just PMed him ten minutes ago, and still haven't gotten any response. I'm not going to say his Screen Name in risk of getting this topic closed. What do I do about this guy? By the way, he's one of the staff members so I can't ask a mod to suspend him

[ghjgfkgfk]

i think i know who you are talking about....
;0

maybe they are just in a bad mood?

[Mini]

If your topics were relevant and obeyed the Guidelines, then it shouldn't be closed.

[*CrackedRearView*]

Your first clue is to take this thread elsewhere.

[Mini]

Your first clue is to take this thread elsewhere.

I agree. This topic is going to be closed anyhow or moved.

[waccoon]

Kay, your thread was closed because you were asking for help with illegal activities. If you're going to do illegal stuff, dont do it here. I didn't insult your site, I gave you criticism. I said the image quality was poor and you should work on it. Why would I be suspended for closing a topic that dealt with illegal activites? Hm, yeah, I can see that you're only eleven.

[angel-roh]

haha i had that feelings it would be nick heehee... i dont know it jus came out of my mind... im not saying u are mean, nick...it just got off my mind haha

[Knight]

Kay, your thread was closed because you were asking for help with illegal activities. If you're going to do illegal stuff, dont do it here. I didn't insult your site, I gave you criticism. I said the image quality was poor and you should work on it. Why would I be suspended for closing a topic that dealt with illegal activites? Hm, yeah, I can see that you're only eleven.

You're right, it was illegal. But even [2]nekked has hacked before. And there was a topic about hacking that never got closed. I was under the impression that you hated me or something. Now I realize that it's just that you give a lot of criticism. That's something that I'm not used to. I have never in my life received criticism about my site. It's something to get used to. Yes, I have competitors. But even they say that my site is good. This is no longer about me asking about hacking, but you being a critic. Saying that my site isn't worth jocking is something that offends me. I guess you're just a critic. This is why I've disliked you ever since I joined createblog. And how did you find this topic?

P.S. I was simply worried that jockers would have an interest in my layout. I no longer need assistance on programs to remove stolen pictures that they do not rightfully own. And what do you mean that you can see that I'm only 11? Are you criticising my age now?

[sporadic]

If you're putting your work up on the web, you should expect criticism, and harsh criticism, too.

[sikdragon]

of you are going to be original you can expect to be copied.

[Knight]

If you're putting your work up on the web, you should expect criticism, and harsh criticism, too.

I know. It's just that it's never happened before. My site is around 300 days old. That's enough to be known as an experienced web master. And within those 300 days, I've never been criticised. I've only received compliments. Hey, I think waccoon's site is crap and I haven't said anything about it. Having a heade with a bunch of lines isn't exactly my idea of cool (as waccoon told me, no offense, but your site has a lot of effort but low quality). I didn'tsay anything because I thought it would be more friendly and perhaps I could get past his hate for me. I guess I was wrong.

if you are going to be original you can expect to be copied.

That's the friggin point! That's why I wanted to stop the jockers and replace the images they stole from me. That's why I'm studying hacking. [2]nekked has hacked a site (skepticalgirl's Xanga).

[sporadic]

Waccoon has more experience in these things and I think he has very high quality work.

I'm surprised that in 300 days you didn't get any criticism.

[sikdragon]

lol, well she probably used a web cracker unless she is really good.

[Knight]

Waccoon has more experience in these things and I think he has very high quality work.

I'm surprised that in 300 days you didn't get any criticism.

Your opinion is different then mine. It's that simple. And I guess his opinion is different than the hundreds of people who have visited my site and liked it. I've got every single e-prop to prove it..

lol, well she probably used a web cracker unless she is really good.

It's simple to hack. All you have to do is download software or look around google for the smallet trace of tips.

[sporadic]

I'm sorry to inform you, but e-props mean nothing.

I went to your site, and a lot of the comments are just people "propping you back"

[sikdragon]

a webcracker is software that tries a whole list of possible passwords.

[Knight]

I'm sorry to inform you, but e-props mean nothing.

Alright then let me rephrase what I said: I have every single comment to prove it. They obviously mean something. They're the very things that have given me confidence in myself to make a good website.

[sikdragon]

i didnt get a reply :'(

[Knight]

I went to your site, and a lot of the comments are just people "propping you back"

That's the first time that I ever started randomely leaving props, just to see if it would yield results. The rest of the comments and e-props are naturally from people that like my site.

i didnt get a reply :'(

Then here's one for you now. I didn't know what a webcracker was; I'm new to hacking.

[sporadic]

Alright then let me rephrase what I said: I have every single comment to prove it. They obviously mean something. They're the very things that have given me confidence in myself to make a good website.

I'm not saying your website is bad, I'm just saying that a lot of the comments aren't even relevant to your website's content/design (I'm not sure which one we're talking about).

[*evdxgirl*]

Still, some ppl may lie and say GOOD SYTE KEKE when...its really not. I'm not criticizing your xanga, I'm just saying that in general. I don't really think somebody would go to a xanga and be like 'EW YOUR LAYOUT IS SO UGLY, BYE'

..At least I've never seen anybody do that.

[Luster Soldier]

You really shouldn't be mad at constructive criticism, that's what makes your site better anyways. You can't always expect people to say good things about your site, you have to take the good and the bad. I think that's the experience everybody had.

[sporadic]

Yes. Personally, I've never had anyone say how crappy my site is, but the good comments were just from friends :P

I'm not really interested in going out there and getting my site "rated"

[*Kathleen*]

Okay, you got your question answered on why your threads were closed. I'll close this one now to prevent spamming.

[waccoon]

I know. It's just that it's never happened before. My site is around 300 days old. That's enough to be known as an experienced web master. And within those 300 days, I've never been criticised. I've only received compliments. Hey, I think waccoon's site is crap and I haven't said anything about it. Having a heade with a bunch of lines isn't exactly my idea of cool (as waccoon told me, no offense, but your site has a lot of effort but low quality). I didn'tsay anything because I thought it would be more friendly and perhaps I could get past his hate for me. I guess I was wrong.



That's the friggin point! That's why I wanted to stop the jockers and replace the images they stole from me. That's why I'm studying hacking. [2]nekked has hacked a site (skepticalgirl's Xanga).

Your site may BE around 300 days old, but thats not an expeirence web master. You're using a template for gods sake. You have probably never been criticised because you probably never get any comments anyways, other than your random props. You think my site is crap? How are my images low quality? They're high quality slices. Too bad you can't turn my words around on my, my site doesnt use a template and a background. That's all your site really is, a template from xanga, with a profile picture, a background and some header images. Big deal, everyones gonna be rushing to jock that. If you think my site is crap, it's your opinion, but i pretty much think everyone that sees your site thinks is crap, or knows nothing about designing. [2]Nekked had hacked a site, that doesn't mean you have to. She knows how to, you had to post here looking for progs. Yeah, lots of 11 year olds have copies of Brutus lying around.

You're right, it was illegal. But even [2]nekked has hacked before. And there was a topic about hacking that never got closed. I was under the impression that you hated me or something. Now I realize that it's just that you give a lot of criticism. That's something that I'm not used to. I have never in my life received criticism about my site. It's something to get used to. Yes, I have competitors. But even they say that my site is good. This is no longer about me asking about hacking, but you being a critic. Saying that my site isn't worth jocking is something that offends me. I guess you're just a critic. This is why I've disliked you ever since I joined createblog. And how did you find this topic?

P.S. I was simply worried that jockers would have an interest in my layout. I no longer need assistance on programs to remove stolen pictures that they do not rightfully own. And what do you mean that you can see that I'm only 11? Are you criticising my age now?

It was illegal, and so what if [2]nekked has cracked before? She did it outside of the forums, and only provided a link to it. You have to learn to deal with criticism, because that's the only way to get better. If you keep doing crap like you do now and refuse all criticsm, I suggest you just stop trying right now. Competitors? Everyone on goddamn xanga is your competitor. Your site isnt worth jocking, it's obvious. How hard is it to customize a template and add images by yourself? You dont even own those pictures yourself, that profile picture? DIABLO FORUMS. That background, you stole. The only thing you made was the red image in the header, and nobodys gonna be in a rush to jock that