Log In · Register

 
versus
Maccabee
post May 5 2009, 10:05 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



A:

# Intel® Pentium® Dual-Core Desktop Processor E5300
# 2.60GHz Processor Speed
# 6GB PC2-6400 DDR2 SDRAM memory

B:

# Athlon™ X2 5400+ Dual-Core Processor
# 2.80GHz processor speed
# 4GB PC2-6400 DDR2 SDRAM memory

And B is slimline. Are slimline computers worse?
 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 31)
Maccabee
post May 6 2009, 08:43 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



cmon wheres tama and cj!
 
mipadi
post May 6 2009, 09:28 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 2,648
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,265



I'd go with A. The clock speed increase from A to B is negligible, and A has a lot more RAM (very important). Arguably, the Intel processor is better in this case, too.
 
Maccabee
post May 6 2009, 09:34 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



Ok I think i agree.
I was also thinking about te mghz myth because the pipeline in an intel processor is much longer than amd.
 
heyo-captain-jac...
post May 6 2009, 04:46 PM
Post #5


/人◕‿‿◕人\
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,283
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 602,927



Give me more specs, and tell me what you're doing with it. As is, I say A, but that could change if I find out what you're going to do with it, and things like what kind of GPU is in it.
 
Maccabee
post May 6 2009, 05:18 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



Well im thinking that instead of making my own computer from scratch I would just buy one. Cause I wouldnt save that much money making my own and it wouldn't be much better.

Here is the link to computer A:

http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate....&pCatg=5816

And computer B:

http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate....&pCatg=5816

But im pretty much sold on computer A.
 
heyo-captain-jac...
post May 6 2009, 06:13 PM
Post #7


/人◕‿‿◕人\
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,283
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 602,927



QUOTE(jcp @ May 6 2009, 05:18 PM) *
Well im thinking that instead of making my own computer from scratch I would just buy one. Cause I wouldnt save that much money making my own and it wouldn't be much better.

Here is the link to computer A:

http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate....&pCatg=5816

And computer B:

http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate....&pCatg=5816

But im pretty much sold on computer A.

You can save a considerable amount building your own computer. Sometimes $500 or more.

And the point of building your own computer is so you can have a computer built for exactly what you're going to do with it.
 
Maccabee
post May 6 2009, 08:58 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



QUOTE(Buttsex @ May 6 2009, 06:13 PM) *
You can save a considerable amount building your own computer. Sometimes $500 or more.

And the point of building your own computer is so you can have a computer built for exactly what you're going to do with it.


I did the calculations and I would only save about 100 dollars making my own.
How would you build your computer according to what your doing it with? I just want a computer that does fast processes so the processor is really important to me.

It needs a short pipeline and as many mghz as possible. Thats the only reason I would think about making my own.
 
mipadi
post May 6 2009, 09:48 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 2,648
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,265



QUOTE(jcp @ May 6 2009, 09:58 PM) *
It needs a short pipeline and as many mghz as possible. Thats the only reason I would think about making my own.

No offense, but...do you even know what a process pipeline is, and why it's relevant (or not relevant, as the case may be)?
 
kryogenix
post May 6 2009, 09:51 PM
Post #10


Sarcastic Mr. Know-It-All
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 2,089
Joined: Dec 2003
Member No: 29



QUOTE(mipadi @ May 6 2009, 10:28 AM) *
I'd go with A. The clock speed increase from A to B is negligible, and A has a lot more RAM (very important). Arguably, the Intel processor is better in this case, too.


Yeah, but the ram doesn't matter when this idiot is gonna use a 32-bit OS.
 
Maccabee
post May 7 2009, 06:11 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



Mipadi: yes
and steven..you think im an idiot?
 
illriginal
post May 7 2009, 07:58 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



Neither... Intel E8400 >
 
mipadi
post May 7 2009, 09:11 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 2,648
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,265



QUOTE(jcp @ May 7 2009, 07:11 PM) *
Mipadi: yes

Well, okay...then why do you need a short pipeline?
 
Maccabee
post May 7 2009, 09:54 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



QUOTE(mipadi @ May 7 2009, 09:11 PM) *
Well, okay...then why do you need a short pipeline?

Just because they complete processes faster. I was just saying I want a fast processor.
If im correct a processor is what would make say, rendering a video, or something faster.
Because sometimes when Im editing stuff like a large image just selecting areas take a long time. I dont see how ram would make this faster because ram is Random access memory.
A processor processes.

 
mipadi
post May 8 2009, 08:31 AM
Post #15


Senior Member
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 2,648
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,265



QUOTE(jcp @ May 7 2009, 10:54 PM) *
Just because they complete processes faster. I was just saying I want a fast processor.

If it was true that processors with shorter pipelines always had better performance, why would Intel design chips with such long pipelines?
 
Deospeon
post May 8 2009, 11:27 AM
Post #16


llorT rioneS
*****

Group: Human
Posts: 641
Joined: Mar 2009
Member No: 717,869



NOW JOSEPH!

 
Maccabee
post May 8 2009, 01:02 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



QUOTE(Deospeon @ May 8 2009, 11:27 AM) *
NOW JOSEPH!


I put a together a computer on newegg for like 600. And it was way better then that.
But then I still have to buy a monitor and mouse and keyboard so in the end the 800 dollar computer is actually better and it only costs 100 dollars more, then if I made it myself.
The only thing I am disappointing about is the 2.6ghz dual core processor.
What are the odds that the processor won't be glued on? Cause i would love to replace it with this baby.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16819115036

When you make a computer how often to you have problems with the hardware not being compatible with software?
 
illriginal
post May 8 2009, 02:01 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



I doubt that.



And I've never built a machine in which the hardware had problems with either Windows or Linux, except my Z Cinema speakers but only because Linux gets offended by the way "Cinema" is spelled. It doesn't like the, "`" over the letter "e".
 
Maccabee
post May 8 2009, 02:16 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



QUOTE(illriginal @ May 8 2009, 02:01 PM) *
I doubt that.

Doubt what?
 
illriginal
post May 8 2009, 04:38 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



I've might have misunderstood but from what I did read, I think you're implying that your $600 machine is capable of playing Crysis?...

Just the video card a lone would be between $200-300
 
Maccabee
post May 8 2009, 05:03 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



The guy in the video made a computer than can run crysis for 500 dollars. Im saying i made a very similar computer for 600. just more ram.
 
illriginal
post May 8 2009, 05:16 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



lol with $500?...

He must have used the bare minimum requirements with one cheap ass plastic computer case lol
 
Maccabee
post May 8 2009, 05:33 PM
Post #23


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



QUOTE(illriginal @ May 8 2009, 05:16 PM) *
lol with $500?...

He must have used the bare minimum requirements with one cheap ass plastic computer case lol

QUOTE(Deospeon @ May 8 2009, 11:27 AM) *
NOW JOSEPH!


 
illriginal
post May 8 2009, 05:46 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



Can't watch it.. at work.

I'm being dead ass serious if you have a $500 machine running Crysis, I can only imagine that game play is horrible.
 
heyo-captain-jac...
post May 8 2009, 07:51 PM
Post #25


/人◕‿‿◕人\
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,283
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 602,927



I built a computer not too long ago that runs Crysis pretty well, and it cost just over $700. I don't consider $600 too much of a stretch.
 
Maccabee
post May 9 2009, 09:17 AM
Post #26


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



Crap, the only retail stor I have found that still sells WXP is here
http://www.officedepot.com/a/products/7744...vice/#reviewTab

But it doesnt say if its 64 bit or not! I think i have a friend who has WXP pro, 64 bit. Do copies of xp have like license restrictions? like one per computer?

o wait.
I check newegg.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16832116378
When using a 64 bit os, do 42 bit programs still work? Like can mozzila firefox, filezilla, gimp and any other programs that work on 32 bit work on 64 bit?
And if im upgrading from vista 64 bit to windows xp pro 64 bit do you think there will be incompatibility problems? And would I have to download drivers and stuff.
 
heyo-captain-jac...
post May 9 2009, 03:30 PM
Post #27


/人◕‿‿◕人\
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,283
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 602,927



That's more of a sidegrade than an upgrade.
 
Maccabee
post May 9 2009, 07:51 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



QUOTE(Buttsex @ May 9 2009, 03:30 PM) *
That's more of a sidegrade than an upgrade.

That didnt answer any questions.


What are the odds that Ill be able to replace the proccessor of this computer?
http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate....&pCatg=5816
 
heyo-captain-jac...
post May 9 2009, 08:16 PM
Post #29


/人◕‿‿◕人\
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,283
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 602,927



.013%. You can rarely upgrade anything other than the RAM, HDD, or disk drive in premade computers.

But that's a good processor. You shouldn't need to replace it.
 
Maccabee
post May 9 2009, 10:16 PM
Post #30


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 5,880
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,382



QUOTE(Buttsex @ May 9 2009, 08:16 PM) *
.013%. You can rarely upgrade anything other than the RAM, HDD, or disk drive in premade computers.

But that's a good processor. You shouldn't need to replace it.


Ya think so? I was wanting to get a processor with atleast 3ghz. i want this to be the last computer upgrade I do for a while. and ill have windows xp on it so it will fly either way.
 
heyo-captain-jac...
post May 12 2009, 06:24 PM
Post #31


/人◕‿‿◕人\
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,283
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 602,927



With a Pentium dual core, you're not going to see a major difference between 2.6 and 3 GHz.
 
Uronacid
post May 15 2009, 10:11 AM
Post #32


Senior Member
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,574
Joined: Aug 2007
Member No: 555,438



Honestly man, if you just want the experience of building a computer you shoudl really think about what kind of options you want.


Here are a few articles that will help you decide:

how many cores do you really need?
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/multi-core-cpu,2280.html

CPU preformance charts:
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/processors,6.html

best bang for buck graphics Apr 09'
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon...e-gtx,2270.html

how much ram is too much?
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/memory...grade,2264.html

Tom's HDD guide 2008
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/hdd-te...e-1tb,2077.html


Just keep in mind, that even the most graphics intensive games do not need top of the line hardware. Most high-end hardware is overkill. Buy what you need or build around a budget for the most bang for buck.

Quality Brands:

CPU - AMD or Intel
ATI Video Cards - VisionTek
NVidia Video Cards - EVGA
Memory - Corsair
PSU - Corsair
Mother Boards(SLI) - EVGA
Mother Boards(XFire) - ASUS
 

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: