DEAR ALL STEELER FANSSSS |
 |
Replies
(1 - 29)
 Feb 1 2009, 10:18 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 The Resident Drunk  Group: Head Staff Posts: 8,623 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,266  |
Take pride in knowing that you just won a tainted superbowl!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 10:20 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,020 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 653,768 |
Sore losers.
^_____________________^ time to go run a website and take an eight month hiatus |
|
|
|
| *KINGdinguhling* |
Feb 1 2009, 10:20 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
actually i dont care, im a raiders fan ahah
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 10:21 PM
Post
#5
|
|
 Amberific. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,913 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,772 |
Seriously, keep it to the one Super Bowl thread, guys.
Closed. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 10:56 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
The Resident Drunk Group: Head Staff Posts: 8,623 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,266 |
Reopened no offense, but the topics are originally meant to discuss two different things.
This superbowl for me will be tainted just like serena williams vs capriati us open 03 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 10:58 PM
Post
#7
|
|
 show me a garden thats bursting to life Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
Why was this Super Bowl tainted?
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 10:59 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
The Resident Drunk Group: Head Staff Posts: 8,623 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,266 |
They didn't review the play to see if Warner's arm was going forward or not....Clearly it was.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 11:02 PM
Post
#9
|
|
 Drank wit your boy Group: Official Member Posts: 1,711 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 649,997 |
QUOTE(technicolour @ Feb 1 2009, 11:58 PM)  Why was this Super Bowl tainted? At one point the penalty count was 2 penalties for 15 yards Steelers 8 for 91 yards for the Cards That was before the 2 questionable of 3 personal foul calls that put them in field goal range to make the score 20 - 7. Shit was ridiculous to watch. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 11:41 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
show me a garden thats bursting to life Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
QUOTE(DoubleJ @ Feb 1 2009, 09:59 PM) They didn't review the play to see if Warner's arm was going forward or not....Clearly it was. It so was! That was a crap call. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 11:43 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,020 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 653,768 |
his arm was stopped before he fumbled it, he didn't attempt to throw again, valid call
|
|
|
|
| *KINGdinguhling* |
Feb 1 2009, 11:45 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Guest |
call coulda went either way, depended on the refs
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2009, 11:54 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
rawr? Group: Official Member Posts: 2,705 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 285,858 |
lol (x it was a good game though.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 01:59 AM
Post
#14
|
|
 Live long and prosper. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 5,525 Joined: Nov 2006 Member No: 478,024 |
QUOTE(kryogenix @ Feb 1 2009, 09:20 PM) Sore losers. ^_____________________^ time to go run a website and take an eight month hiatus Hahhaa has jusun always has that avatar? |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 02:43 AM
Post
#15
|
|
 ^_^ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,141 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,466 |
I made $500 from the Superbowl.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 10:37 AM
Post
#16
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Administrator Posts: 2,648 Joined: Apr 2008 Member No: 639,265 |
QUOTE(DoubleJ @ Feb 1 2009, 10:59 PM) They didn't review the play to see if Warner's arm was going forward or not....Clearly it was. They did review it, and decided that he did, in fact, fumble. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 12:05 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
The Resident Drunk Group: Head Staff Posts: 8,623 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,266 |
QUOTE(mipadi @ Feb 2 2009, 10:37 AM) They did review it, and decided that he did, in fact, fumble. Uhm....they reviewed it AFTER the game and celebration. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 02:53 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Administrator Posts: 2,648 Joined: Apr 2008 Member No: 639,265 |
QUOTE(DoubleJ @ Feb 2 2009, 12:05 PM) Uhm....they reviewed it AFTER the game and celebration. No, the reviewed it right after the play -- that's why it took a while for the Steelers to actually run their final kneel-down. Stuff like that almost always gets automatically reviewed, even though the network might run the commercials instead of showing the ref actually going over to the hood. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 03:41 PM
Post
#19
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Official Designer Posts: 5,880 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,382 |
QUOTE(WarMachine @ Feb 2 2009, 01:43 AM) I made $500 from the Superbowl. Thats right  But what if you had lost  Thats why i dont bet. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 05:15 PM
Post
#20
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Duplicate Posts: 60 Joined: Jan 2009 Member No: 712,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 05:18 PM
Post
#21
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,665 Joined: Aug 2008 Member No: 676,364 |
more than average of the fans knew the steelers would win, ;/
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 05:20 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Amberific. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,913 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,772 |
QUOTE(Sycophant @ Feb 2 2009, 05:15 PM) OH MY GOD THANK YOU.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 06:53 PM
Post
#23
|
|
 Pokeball, GO! Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,832 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 433,009 |
ARIZONERS SHOULD HAD WUNZ!!!!!1!!11!!
Sorry, my inner, angry, drunken sports fan took over for a second. Sorry to anyone HE has offended. Ha, I was pulling for Arizona but I didn't really care. I'm a Bucs fan... Yeah yeah har har, I know, shut up. |
|
|
|
| *KINGdinguhling* |
Feb 2 2009, 09:04 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Guest |
ROFLLL CHARGERS > BUCS
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 09:07 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
The Resident Drunk Group: Head Staff Posts: 8,623 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,266 |
QUOTE(mipadi @ Feb 2 2009, 02:53 PM) No, the reviewed it right after the play -- that's why it took a while for the Steelers to actually run their final kneel-down. Stuff like that almost always gets automatically reviewed, even though the network might run the commercials instead of showing the ref actually going over to the hood. Explain to me how their were no commercials in between the supposed fumble and the running off of the clock. It clearly said on espn that they reviewed it after the game. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 09:10 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Pokeball, GO! Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,832 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 433,009 |
QUOTE(KINGdinguhling @ Feb 2 2009, 10:04 PM) ROFLLL CHARGERS > BUCS LAWLZ BUCS > EVERY1S! I can't help it. I'm from Tampa. It's in my blood. |
|
|
|
| *KINGdinguhling* |
Feb 2 2009, 09:17 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Guest |
too shay
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 09:32 PM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,665 Joined: Aug 2008 Member No: 676,364 |
QUOTE(smoke @ Feb 2 2009, 06:10 PM) LAWLZ BUCS < EVERY1S! I can't help it. I'm from Tampa. It's in my blood. I'm from Da Burg. I hate them. The whole Bucs fanatics say they'll do better, but they always seem to fail. I was at the Super Bowl Breakfast in Tampa, I just hope what they say comes true. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 09:51 PM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Pokeball, GO! Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,832 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 433,009 |
QUOTE(ninjaBeenly @ Feb 2 2009, 10:32 PM) I'm from Da Burg. I hate them. The whole Bucs fanatics say they'll do better, but they always seem to fail. I was at the Super Bowl Breakfast in Tampa, I just hope what they say comes true. Yeah well I was pissed for awhile that they had a dream team and then traded everyone to pay off for that stupid ass, overly priced pirate ship. (Actually, it's really cool in person, but I'm trying to make a point.) It's no wonder they aren't that great anymore. It's all about money these days, not the team. That's why the Rays were so popular last year. They're just a good, wholesome baseball team. We need more of that in sports. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2009, 10:08 PM
Post
#30
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Administrator Posts: 2,648 Joined: Apr 2008 Member No: 639,265 |
QUOTE(DoubleJ @ Feb 2 2009, 09:07 PM) Explain to me how their were no commercials in between the supposed fumble and the running off of the clock. It clearly said on espn that they reviewed it after the game. Reviews only take a minute or so. Even so, there was no "incontrovertible evidence" that he was making a forward pass. The call is certainly debatable, but it's certainly quite possible (most likely) that he was tucking the ball, &c. |
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: