Log In · Register

 
May I have my member of the month status revoked, o(-(
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 10 2008, 10:01 PM
Post #1


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



Listen I appreciate you guys for voting me MOTM but it has been bought to my attention that two mods in particular have a problem with this. I ain't going to say no names though.

Thomas and Nate, oops my bad.


Oh U Mad? I'm sorry, I apologize to Nate and Thomas, I had no idea CB meant so much to either of you and that this shit was more serious than life itself. Listen its not that big of a deal to me and never has been, so just to make you two "I talk behind peoples backs" guys happy I'm willing to step down from the MOTM status so Nate and Thomas can give it to a member that will willingly kiss they ass.


Now act like you can't tell who made this
New gospel homey take six, and take this, haters.


With love, KC throb.gif







 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 39)
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 10 2008, 10:05 PM
Post #2


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



QUOTE(banhbao @ Aug 10 2008, 11:03 PM) *
Wait, why do they have a problem? =(

Yeah thats a good question Linda. But Nate thinks everyone on CB is twats. Just letting you all know.
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 10:05 PM
Post #3


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(banhbao @ Aug 10 2008, 10:03 PM) *
Wait, why do they have a problem? =(
Probably 'cause he's a and they're xmas.gif.
 
demolished
post Aug 10 2008, 10:09 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



I am getting a little irritated about moderators now, but i don't know the exact details.
 
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 10 2008, 10:09 PM
Post #5


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



QUOTE(kreios @ Aug 10 2008, 11:06 PM) *
I'm not sure what my problem is, but apparently, someone else thinks I have a problem...



Comedy ensues.



QUOTE(banhbao @ Aug 10 2008, 11:07 PM) *
twats? Okay, a few are. Not you though. At least I don't have reason to believe so...yet. >.>

Yeah I never knew I was one. I've always been humble for the most part.
 
demolished
post Aug 10 2008, 10:14 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



^
He should. Let's see the reactions/responses of the moderators first before they just jump in the boat and do it.
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 10:15 PM
Post #7


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(banhbao @ Aug 10 2008, 10:12 PM) *
I'm sure theres a misunderstanding. Don't request for your MotM to be revoked!
KC doesn't need his MotM to stay freeeshhh. KC is KC FO'LIFE. He'll always be da best mang, he deed it. He don't need no MotM label to prove it.
 
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 10 2008, 10:21 PM
Post #8


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



Haha @ Arjuna.


I hope this is a misunderstanding but I highly doubt it is. As I said I have no problems with Nate nor Thomas, because CB isn't that serious to me, however if someone has a problem with me being member of the month and its irritating them like that then for their sakes Its cool with it being revoked. I'm not trying to ruin anyone's day here. I'm just trying to sit back and find the next funniest post I can get a laugh out of.
 
Tung
post Aug 10 2008, 10:21 PM
Post #9


٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 14,309
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 65,593



When I was Member of the Month, I broke the record of having a 20% warning level, which technically meant I shouldn't even be MoTm.

KC will break another record, as being the only MoTM to get his title revoked.

Damn @ 's moving mountains one at a time.

However, being the curiosity cat I am, I would like to know the whole explanation for this. What exactly is the problem that you have with these two mods you are calling out at hand? I'm sure there's a good explanation, because there never is.
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 10:22 PM
Post #10


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(Tungster @ Aug 10 2008, 10:21 PM) *
However, being the curiosity cat I am, I would like to know the whole explanation for this. What exactly is the problem that you have with these two mods you are calling out at hand? I'm sure there's a good explanation, because there never is.
Yeah I'm curious as heck as to why KC would make a movement like this too 'cause I don't know exactly what he's talkin' about either.

I want to see some mods speakin' up.
 
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 10 2008, 10:26 PM
Post #11


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



QUOTE(Tungster @ Aug 10 2008, 11:21 PM) *
When I was Member of the Month, I broke the record of having a 20% warning level, which technically meant I shouldn't even be MoTm.

KC will break another record, as being the only MoTM to get his title revoked.

Damn @ 's moving mountains one at a time.

However, being the curiosity cat I am, I would like to know the whole explanation for this. What exactly is the problem that you have with these two mods you are calling out at hand? I'm sure there's a good explanation, because there never is.

See thats the thing Tung, I don't have a problem with them , but they apparently have a problem with me. I don't even know who Nate is for the most part, hardly ever see him post. Just found out about a week ago its NoSex or something like that. I'm more than welcome to talk to you about it, don't want to put everything out there in the opening.


LOL @ setting records.
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 10:27 PM
Post #12


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(kreios @ Aug 10 2008, 10:26 PM) *
Sorry, I'm tied up. I can't talk about it.
Just step down now, please.
 
demolished
post Aug 10 2008, 10:33 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



QUOTE(demolished @ Aug 10 2008, 08:09 PM) *
I am getting a little irritated about moderators now, but i don't know the exact details.


mellow.gif + i feel annoying. tongue.gif
 
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 10 2008, 10:38 PM
Post #14


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



QUOTE(kreios @ Aug 10 2008, 11:26 PM) *
Sorry, I'm tied up. I can't talk about it.

Its cool I understand. You can only talk about this stuff backstage.
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 10:42 PM
Post #15


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(BanDaSnowman @ Aug 10 2008, 10:38 PM) *
Its cool I understand. You can only talk about this stuff backstage.
We Outlawz motherf**kers can't kill my pride
Niggaz talk alot of shit but thats after I'm gone
Cuz they fear me in the physical form
Let it be known I'm troublesome



I'm not pointing fingers or accusing anyone of anything right now, but there better not be talking trash about members backstage. Big no-no. Don't tell me we need to make Backstage and Boardroom visible to the public too.
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 10:45 PM
Post #16


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(kreios @ Aug 10 2008, 10:43 PM) *
I haven't even said anything about KC on the visible forums, so obviously someone with backstage access has brought this to his attention.
DING DING DING



OH SNAP NINJA, OH SNAP



SOUND THE ALARMS





QUOTE(kreios @ Aug 10 2008, 10:43 PM) *
Why does that have anything to do with stepping down?
Thomas, you just admitted that you talked trash about KC Backstage.
 
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 10 2008, 10:49 PM
Post #17


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



QUOTE(kreios @ Aug 10 2008, 11:43 PM) *
Why does that have anything to do with stepping down? I haven't even said anything about KC on the visible forums, so obviously someone with backstage access has brought this to his attention. But that's not what bothers me, what bothers me is that I said one thing about him being MOTM with his warning, yet, someone pulled that out of context and believes that I have this problem with him now.

QUOTE(ArjunaCapulong @ Aug 10 2008, 11:45 PM) *
DING DING DING
OH SNAP NINJA, OH SNAP
SOUND THE ALARMS

Thomas, you just admitted that you talked trash about KC Backstage.



Ok that confirms it. So I was right then, and to make you happy just revoke the Member of the Month Status.
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 10:51 PM
Post #18


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(kreios @ Aug 10 2008, 10:48 PM) *
Trash talked hardly not. You were a mod once no? There are topics about members, when a member is brought up backstage, it doesn't mean that they are being trash talked.
Look, I don't know where KC's been or done, but if you haven't been talking trash about him, I don't see why he's so dang pissed that he'd request his MotM status revoked.
 
The-March-Hare
post Aug 10 2008, 11:13 PM
Post #19


James killed the radio star.
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 2,095
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 589,855



I'd just like to point out that no one has ever been unanimously voted MOTM, that I can recall, so I'm not sure why your assumption that two people oppose your election would cause you to want to step down.

I mean, if you're holding out for universal popularity, your going to have a long wait, as would anyone.

*shrug*
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 11:24 PM
Post #20


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(The-March-Hare @ Aug 10 2008, 11:13 PM) *
I'd just like to point out that no one has ever been unanimously voted MOTM, that I can recall, so I'm not sure why your assumption that two people oppose your election would cause you to want to step down.

I mean, if you're holding out for universal popularity, your going to have a long wait, as would anyone.

*shrug*
Yeah, 'cause I'm sure KC would bug out like this simply because two mods voted against him. Don't be so irrational.
 
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 10 2008, 11:31 PM
Post #21


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



QUOTE(The-March-Hare @ Aug 11 2008, 12:13 AM) *
I'd just like to point out that no one has ever been unanimously voted MOTM, that I can recall, so I'm not sure why your assumption that two people oppose your election would cause you to want to step down.

I mean, if you're holding out for universal popularity, your going to have a long wait, as would anyone.

*shrug*

I have seen backstage, but not from who you're probably all thinking.

I don't have a problem with every mod voting for me or not. I'm aware that when people make decisions most of the times its not going to be unanimous. However I do have a problem with talk behind my back. Specifically Nate calling me and supposedly everyone else on CB twats. If you have a problem with me, then I would expect you to be a man and come and talk to me about it instead of hiding it backstage. I'm an easy going person and I haven't done anything to this guy that would warrant that kind of talk from him.
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 11:36 PM
Post #22


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(BanDaSnowman @ Aug 10 2008, 11:31 PM) *
I have seen backstage, but not from who you're probably all thinking.
ohmy.gif wtf

Brotha, you always full of surprises, shoo. You da best mang, you dun it.
 
Melie
post Aug 10 2008, 11:43 PM
Post #23


Melieized
******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 1,372
Joined: Nov 2006
Member No: 478,715



it's sh%t like this that makes CB become less interesting...it's so easy to get lost in the power that these mods have but to take it to an extreme where they have to keep their comments about someone backstage is so middle school.

if someone has a problem with someone then step up and say something!

this is just pure BS
 
DoubleJ
post Aug 10 2008, 11:45 PM
Post #24


The Resident Drunk
*******

Group: Head Staff
Posts: 8,623
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,266



soooooooo....how about Michael Phelps?
 
Simba
post Aug 10 2008, 11:47 PM
Post #25


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



QUOTE(Melie @ Aug 10 2008, 11:43 PM) *
it's sh%t like this that makes CB become less interesting...it's so easy to get lost in the power that these mods have but to take it to an extreme where they have to keep their comments about someone backstage is so middle school.

if someone has a problem with someone then step up and say something!

this is just pure BS
+1

lol Javonn, you are always so dang chill
 
KryMeARiver
post Aug 10 2008, 11:47 PM
Post #26


Banned
*****

Group: Banned
Posts: 700
Joined: Jun 2008
Member No: 658,432



More like, how about kicking some pompous French ass?
 
DoubleJ
post Aug 10 2008, 11:48 PM
Post #27


The Resident Drunk
*******

Group: Head Staff
Posts: 8,623
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 593,266



I try to be bro. I am not trying to get caught up in this anymore.
 
karmakiller
post Aug 10 2008, 11:52 PM
Post #28


DDR \\ I'm Dee :)
*******

Group: Mentor
Posts: 8,662
Joined: Mar 2006
Member No: 384,020



QUOTE(BanDaSnowman @ Aug 10 2008, 11:31 PM) *
I have seen backstage, but not from who you're probably all thinking.

I don't have a problem with every mod voting for me or not. I'm aware that when people make decisions most of the times its not going to be unanimous. However I do have a problem with talk behind my back. Specifically Nate calling me and supposedly everyone else on CB twats. If you have a problem with me, then I would expect you to be a man and come and talk to me about it instead of hiding it backstage. I'm an easy going person and I haven't done anything to this guy that would warrant that kind of talk from him.
I don't know what you are referring to, but members are not discussed Backstage. The only time that a member is brought up is when it's about hiring. So if you've seen Backstage, as you claim you have rolleyes.gif you must be mistaken.
 
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 11 2008, 02:21 AM
Post #29


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



QUOTE(karmakiller @ Aug 10 2008, 11:52 PM) *
I don't know what you are referring to, but members are not discussed Backstage. The only time that a member is brought up is when it's about hiring. So if you've seen Backstage, as you claim you have rolleyes.gif you must be mistaken.

Thomas deleted my post but he isn't smart enough to realize I have the screenshots saved.
 
NoSex
post Aug 11 2008, 07:44 AM
Post #30


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



KC? You want your Member of the Month status revoked? laugh.gif

This is so ironic.*

*staff'll know what I'm talking about, but most of you won't because you guys can't see backstage. But, we can! Neener neener neener! tongue.gif

 
hi-C
post Aug 11 2008, 08:43 AM
Post #31


Amberific.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,913
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 29,772



QUOTE(karmakiller @ Aug 11 2008, 12:52 AM) *
I don't know what you are referring to, but members are not discussed Backstage. The only time that a member is brought up is when it's about hiring. So if you've seen Backstage, as you claim you have rolleyes.gif you must be mistaken.
Eh... it's happened before, at least in my day, at least in the chit-chat topic, and if that's still back there, I'm sure that times haven't changed that much. It's human nature to be "gossipy."
 
superstitious
post Aug 11 2008, 10:04 AM
Post #32


Tick tock, Bill
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 333,948



KC, don't you dare. You were voted as MoTM. If people don't like you, don't like the way you post, they're entitled to that opinion but that doesn't mean that you didn't win MoTM fair and square.

So no, you don't get to have you MoTM status revoked. ;)

Besides, I really like your colors. xD

(sigh, so much going on) lol
 
libertie
post Aug 12 2008, 09:10 PM
Post #33


This bag is not a toy.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,090
Joined: Oct 2007
Member No: 583,108



Honestly, why the hell is this such a big deal? We have a voting topic for MOTM, so OBVIOUSLY members get "talked" about while we decide who the winner should be. You should expect that on occasion people will be voted against, and the mod voting against that person might explain why. To say that this stuff is being put under a blanket backstage is just stupid, because that's what that thread was FOR.

If you guys are gonna be so uptight about what gets said in the voting thread, maybe we should just move voting to PMs.
 
Simba
post Aug 12 2008, 09:20 PM
Post #34


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



Erm, we're past the "arguing/scolding" stage of this particular issue. I'm waiting for the resolution.
 
firechild
post Aug 12 2008, 09:27 PM
Post #35


BBM: 310ED181
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 613
Joined: Jul 2008
Member No: 671,976



Why? would he want it removed
 
demolished
post Aug 12 2008, 09:29 PM
Post #36


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



QUOTE(libertie @ Aug 12 2008, 07:10 PM) *
Honestly, why the hell is this such a big deal? We have a voting topic for MOTM, so OBVIOUSLY members get "talked" about while we decide who the winner should be. You should expect that on occasion people will be voted against, and the mod voting against that person might explain why. To say that this stuff is being put under a blanket backstage is just stupid, because that's what that thread was FOR.

If you guys are gonna be so uptight about what gets said in the voting thread, maybe we should just move voting to PMs.

I dont know about that, but take a look over here. this is called, "overboard" which is BEYOND "natural" for people be "talked" about.

http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/3917/id...bestmangwg3.jpg
 
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 12 2008, 10:11 PM
Post #37


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



QUOTE(NoSex @ Aug 11 2008, 08:44 AM) *
KC? You want your Member of the Month status revoked? laugh.gif

This is so ironic.*

*staff'll know what I'm talking about, but most of you won't because you guys can't see backstage. But, we can! Neener neener neener! tongue.gif



QUOTE(superstitious @ Aug 11 2008, 11:04 AM) *
KC, don't you dare. You were voted as MoTM. If people don't like you, don't like the way you post, they're entitled to that opinion but that doesn't mean that you didn't win MoTM fair and square.

So no, you don't get to have you MoTM status revoked. ;)

Besides, I really like your colors. xD

(sigh, so much going on) lol

LOL its cool, I don't care if he doesn't like me, I try my best to make those who hate me happy to. Therefore I felt by revoking the MOTM it would all work out.

QUOTE(libertie @ Aug 12 2008, 10:10 PM) *
Honestly, why the hell is this such a big deal? We have a voting topic for MOTM, so OBVIOUSLY members get "talked" about while we decide who the winner should be. You should expect that on occasion people will be voted against, and the mod voting against that person might explain why. To say that this stuff is being put under a blanket backstage is just stupid, because that's what that thread was FOR.

If you guys are gonna be so uptight about what gets said in the voting thread, maybe we should just move voting to PMs.

Explain to me how I'm being uptight about this when I'm only trying to make the two dudes I mentioned in my posts happy. I asked a simple question to have my member of the month status revoked. If you go back and read when Tung asked me a question I avoided the real issue at hand, however it was karmakiller who insisted I was lying therefore I had to show proof. Yeah somehow I'm being uptight even though I find this humorous and pure comedy. You do realize I don't know this guy Nate. Its like Kwame Brown calling out Kobe Bryant. I'm like who are you?
 
demolished
post Aug 12 2008, 10:12 PM
Post #38


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



^
and it's funny that she's bitching now after someone burn down the bull craps with evidences. laugh.gif
 
SuckDickNSaveLiv...
post Aug 12 2008, 10:19 PM
Post #39


Drank wit your boy
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,711
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 649,997



QUOTE(demolished @ Aug 12 2008, 11:12 PM) *
^
and it's funny that she's bitching now after someone burn down the bull craps with evidences. laugh.gif

LOL, its cool though. I can even agree with Rebs who said I didn't go about things the right way. I appreciate that, she was able to come and PM me and tell me I was wrong unlike that other guy. cry.gif
 
libertie
post Aug 13 2008, 01:11 PM
Post #40


This bag is not a toy.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,090
Joined: Oct 2007
Member No: 583,108



QUOTE(demolished @ Aug 12 2008, 10:12 PM) *
^
and it's funny that she's bitching now after someone burn down the bull craps with evidences. laugh.gif

*cough* Excuse me? laugh.gif

You do realize I've been on vacation and as an "outsider" of sorts, I really don't see how this is that big of a deal. Here's the thing, you don't have to show me the screenshots. I was there, see? Believe me, it has not been overlooked like some of you think it has.

You have to see from our point of view that it comes as a bit of an insult to have people blasting stuff like this all over the forums as if nothing is being done. You're getting information you shouldn't have from backstage, but obviously the person who leaked the information was too naive to realize that there was discussion happening over it among the upper staff. Whoever is responsible for this (KC and Arjuna included) really has caused more harm than good and none of you are in any position to be placing any demands.
 

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: