LoZ: Wind Waker |
 Jun 27 2004, 12:56 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Senior Member  Group: Member Posts: 348 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,385  |
Okay...I am sorry, but this makes me soo mad. I was in Electronics Boutique today and this nerdy kid was in there talking to an employee about what game he should get for GameCube or whatever. The employee recommends Wind Waker. The kid (who was probably 18 or so) says "No! That is the most kiddy game ever! The graphics are like little kids!" Okay, that just makes me mad. I left the store right then...
My point is...Well, there really isn't a point, but anyways...I wish people would stop judging books, er, games by their covers. Stop making opinions based on what other people say and make your own. Excuse my ranting. |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 9)
|
Jun 27 2004, 01:18 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 SaSuKeNaRu Group: Member Posts: 223 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 22,819 |
Play demos and read reviews b4 u buy things... dont just go oh its a bad game just cause it has bad graphics.. u'd be amazed at how many games ive glanced over and realized were gems. FF7 being my first
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2004, 08:56 AM
Post
#3
|
|
 Quincy Group: Member Posts: 872 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 23,613 |
FF7 has great graphics for the time. Especially with the cut scenes.
Wind Waker does have lack luster graphics. but common, its a Zelda game, you cant go wrong with Miyamato. |
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Jun 28 2004, 09:19 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
Yeah, i dont understand this whole, "it's-a-kiddie-looking-game-so-i-won't-play-it" concept. Since when does blood, gore and violence make a game good, or the lack of them make a game bad?
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2004, 11:10 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 348 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,385 |
Games with lack-luster graphcis (not applying to LoZ:WW. i like the graphics actually) are often games with the newest innovations or great gameplay.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2004, 12:17 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Quincy Group: Member Posts: 872 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 23,613 |
Wind Waker actually did have quite horrendous graphics. Even for cel shading. The lighting however, wow, incredible.
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Jun 28 2004, 01:23 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(OshKoshPoshJosh @ Jun 28 2004, 11:10 AM) Games with lack-luster graphcis (not applying to LoZ:WW. i like the graphics actually) are often games with the newest innovations or great gameplay. take earthbound for example. not very good graphics, but a very different kind of rpg. and a great game. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2004, 01:32 PM
Post
#8
|
|
 ilikeyouSofreakingmuch. Group: Member Posts: 2,014 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 643 |
I'm not that into video games ... but i DO like SSX3 fer PS2 .. awesome graphics .. but i think final fantasy has the best graphics
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2004, 01:40 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 348 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,385 |
QUOTE(kryogenix @ Jun 28 2004, 1:23 PM) take earthbound for example. not very good graphics, but a very different kind of rpg. and a great game. We all know that you like Earthbound...a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2004, 11:33 PM
Post
#10
|
|
 samurai champloo! Group: Member Posts: 748 Joined: Dec 2003 Member No: 2 |
QUOTE(OshKoshPoshJosh @ Jun 28 2004, 12:10 PM) Games with lack-luster graphcis (not applying to LoZ:WW. i like the graphics actually) are often games with the newest innovations or great gameplay. Animal Crossing  QUOTE Wind Waker does have lack luster graphics. but common, its a Zelda game, you cant go wrong with Miyamato. Oh man, totally agreed. Screw the people who judge based on looks alone. It's their loss, huh. Actually, then again, we're in the realm of fanboyism.... Oh oh. What do you think about the new Zelda coming up?  Any inputs as to what the storyline you think will be like? HmmMMMm? It took them long enough to make this version of Zelda!!  Especially after that clip with the Link and Ganondorf sword fight that raised our hopes so high. But now this is coming... and we'll soon be satiated in our Zelda needs.
|
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: