Insertion/Penetration/LoveMaking/CBHAWTS3CKS, Another Sex Thread Options

[fameONE]

Based on their displayed personality traits, posted pictures and general charisma, which member(s) on Createblog do you think would be good lay?

This should be interesting.

[*Steven*]

pepperoni tits

[weed]

Based on their displayed personality traits, posted pictures and general charisma, which member(s) on Createblog do you think would be good lay?

you.

[missnh]

hm. mmm...

Steph. lol

[*Steven*]

inc crotch shots, imo

[pandora]

you.

check yourself.

[superstitious]

check yourself.

LOL

I'm going to just...leave this thread to you guys. Hahaha

[fameONE]

LOL

I'm going to just...leave this thread to you guys. Hahaha

C'mon Rebs, join the fun.

[Tung]

Jane. Statutory rape is the way to go imo.

you.

Lawls, better lay off Brandon. He's taken.

[tokyo-rose]

you.

You don't even want to go there.

Lol Tung, that sounds like you want to rape a statue. It's called statutory rape.

[Teesa]

MMMMM..no-one, haha

[freeflow]

check yourself.

I saw that coming.

[Tung]

JANE.

[misoshiru]

check yourself.

HAHA loves it.

[stephinika]

Haha oh Trish. That vid is seriously awesome.


And thanks Michelle! Lol.


Hmm...I'll come back to this, hehehe..

[moninja]

check yourself.

haha "bamsucka." i like how your facial expression is like but then you laugh right when you punch him x]

[LoveToMySilas]

JANE.

^ Me? Out of all the underaged girlies?

[fameONE]

Damn near 200 views and few have the cojones to speak on the topic.

[Tung]

J A N E

[DoubleJ]

Wow I don't know....that is a good question.

[LoveToMySilas]

I think I would bangbang Michelle. :X

Sorry , Steven.

[MissHygienic]

TRISH WHEN SHE'S FEISTY.

[pandora]

[*Steven*]

I think I would bangbang Michelle. :X

Sorry , Steven.

It's cool.

[LoveToMySilas]

^ Thanks man.

[*Steven*]

No problem, just have her back by 3am.

[pandora]

Dude why would he be opposed to that?

[fameONE]

No problem, just have her back by 3am.

[stephinika]

Haha oh Steven...

I agree though I think Michelle would be awesome.

I remember reading something Trish wrote about a school girl outfit so I don't know, I think she'd be pretty awesome too. Sorry Brandon! Haha

[libertie]

Dude, I was gonna try to make a serious response but the ratio of hot girls to hot guys here is like.. 10:1.

[xquizit]

Errrr.. MICHELLE. Hands down.

[missnh]

Dude, I was gonna try to make a serious response but the ratio of hot girls to hot guys here is like.. 10:1.

That is so unfortunately true! WHERE ARE ALL THE HOTTIES IN THE WORLD?!?!!?



Roxanne, I would stare at your tattoo the whole time, b/c it's so hot. Hahaha

[fameONE]

I once had a "list." That "list" no longer exists.

[libertie]

I bet I know what happened to it.

[fameONE]

I bet I know what happened to it.

Take a stab at it, Dani.

[EddieV]

I once had a "list." That "list" no longer exists.

[pandora]

Realized 80% of the people on your list are minors?

[EddieV]

My list is full of majors.

[fameONE]

Realized 80% of the people on your list are minors?

I'm not Tung.

[DoubleJ]

Would it be wrong if I said nobody? I just think that all the ones that I like, are taken.

[EddieV]

Brandon - Why do I have a feeling our old lists are similar with minor differences?

[Tung]

I'm not Tung.

you're right. i have much better taste.

[fameONE]

you're right. i have much better taste.

Females must be, at least, 18 to ride Big Daddy.

[EddieV]

If you're Big Daddy, then I'm AzN PerZuaZion! ew

[libertie]

Take a stab at it, Dani.

*points to Trish*

[fameONE]

Brandon - Why do I have a feeling our old lists are similar with minor differences?

They're probably nearly identical.

[pandora]

Ok if they weren't taken who'd be on your list?

[fameONE]

Would it be wrong if I said nobody? I just think that all the ones that I like, are taken.

Let's hear it.

[stephinika]

Ooh, Roxy! Your tattoos/piercings and all of you are so damn hot. Hahaha I agree on that hot girl/guy ratio btw.

[illriginal]

Based on their displayed personality traits, posted pictures and general charisma, which member(s) on Createblog do you think would be good lay?

This should be interesting.

Can you for once make a thread about somethin intellectual? For f**k sake.. you're so damn typical it's laughable.

[DoubleJ]

:I'll pm you that lol.

:Oh God no.

[Tung]

Can you for once make a thread about somethin intellectual? For f**k sake.. you're so damn typical it's laughable.

Your bad grammar and small dick makes you even more laughable!

[illriginal]

Your bad grammar and small dick makes you even more laughable!

The fact that you're asian and speakin of bad grammar and small dick is even more laughable and ironic at the same time bwuahahahaha

[Tung]

The fact that you're asian and speakin of bad grammar and small dick is even more laughable and ironic at the same time bwuahahahaha

Pretty sure my Asian penis is bigger than your dick. We can compare on webcam if you like. tungtwista@hotmail.com

[S-Majere]

I call witness.

[DoubleJ]

^I knew you would do it lol!

[illriginal]

Pretty sure my Asian penis is bigger than your dick. We can compare on webcam if you like. tungtwista@hotmail.com

ROFLMAO You're such a homosexual. I don't usually sit here brag about my appendage. But I do know this Dominicano/Italiano stallion is bigger than your half size chop stick.

LOL "We can compare on webcam if you like. tungtwista@hotmail.com"
W.T.F.

[S-Majere]

Oh, take him up on it. You're secure in your sexuality.

[illriginal]

Oh, take him up on it. You're secure in your sexuality.

If comparing my penis size with another man makes me "secure" of my sexuality, then you can call me highly insecure. Because I don't know for a fact if he's a homosexual and he'll get turned on by it.

So lets not use "sexual security" as an excuse to share/compare my penis size with another male. That whole "sexual security" argument is made by homosexuals.

[xTINAA]

If you're secure in your sexuality it shouldn't matter whether or not you turn another guy on. In fact, it could even be taken as a compliment that not only can you turn on the opposite sex, but the same sex. But maybe you can't do that either?

[illriginal]

If you're secure in your sexuality it shouldn't matter whether or not you turn another guy on. In fact, it could even be taken as a compliment that not only can you turn on the opposite sex, but the same sex. But maybe you can't do that either?

Sorry... I don't get down with homosexuals nor homosexual activities with heterosexuals. Nor would I go show off my penis to another person of the same sex or even of the different sex... Why should I commit an immoral act just to please the vision and pathetically low wisdom of another? Sure if it was a doctor and I was worried about something. But to sit here and compare our penis size? LOL WTF man... all you kids (erm... devils) are rotting from the inside out.

I'm definitely insecure, while I'm 100% sure that I'm heterosexual and love to fondle my lady and her body parts.

And please don't use that insecure/secure argument... that's an argument created by homosexuals. Learn somethin =\

[S-Majere]

Cool down Tamacracker, someone hit the right button there.

[illriginal]

Cool down Tamacracker, someone hit the right button there.

I am cool... I'm just sayin, what does comparing dick sizes have anything to do with this thread... or anything in general for that matter?

[xTINAA]

I was only referring to the part of your post where you mentioned that you didn't want to show out of fear that he could be turned on. I said nothing about participating in this so called immoral act.

Being insecure on your sexuality yet 100% sure you're heterosexual and loving to "fondle your lady" seems like a contradiction to me.

Another thing, don't tell me to learn something or refer to me as a kid. =)

[illriginal]

I was only referring to the part of your post where you mentioned that you didn't want to show out of fear that he could be turned on. I said nothing about participating in this so called immoral act.

Being insecure on your sexuality yet 100% sure you're heterosexual and loving to "fondle your lady" seems like a contradiction to me.

Another thing, don't tell me to learn something or refer to me as a kid. =)

Like I said, if showing off private parts to another person of the same sex only proves how "secure" you are about your sexuality then you can call me insecure. But using the argument of sexual insecurity and security to get someone to show off private parts to the same sex is not even worth it, it's laughable. That's an argument that homosexuals use which in that case, holds no merit to me in any sort of way. They can call me insecure and I'll agree to their standard of insecurity, but at least I have my morals, honor, dignity, and self respect.

And yes... I'm heterosexual, scientifically speaking, nothing else. Your standards of insecurity holds no merit to my standards of sexual security. I don't need to prove anythin to anyone about my sexuality, that's just moronic.

Oh and callin you a kid... I thought only a child would instigate arguments about sexuality. And you're right!, I shouldn't tell you to go learn anything, for which it's true that I honestly don't care about you =\

[Heathasm]

MMMMM..no-one, haha

ID DO YOU.

OH and i wouldnt mind seeing the peni compare-off LOL

[S-Majere]

Oh and callin you a kid... I thought only a child would instigate arguments about sexuality. And you're right!, I shouldn't tell you to go learn anything, for which it's true that I honestly don't care about you =\

Traditionally, it's bad form to respond to criticism of any kind.

TBH, I think a lot of what instigates arguments with you on here is your misguided perception that we're all 9 year olds with the IQ of a parsnip. You do yourself no favours by getting so involved with us parsnip-brains.

Everyone chill? Coolios. Back to the sexz0rs.

[illriginal]

Traditionally, it's bad form to respond to criticism of any kind.

TBH, I think a lot of what instigates arguments with you on here is your misguided perception that we're all 9 year olds with the IQ of a parsnip. You do yourself no favours by getting so involved with us parsnip-brains.

Everyone chill? Coolios. Back to the sexz0rs.

Right and your involvement is any better? You shouldn't even be a moderator. Look at you, "Back to the sexz0rs". Knowin there's minors in this forum board. You have no respect.


Shit there should be an investigation on the forum boards... let the authorities and the parents of these kids (majority) take a look as to what you provoke, instigate, and bring to these kids vision and thoughts. Actually, you're no better than a pedophile.

[brooklyneast05]

Right and your involvement is any better? You shouldn't even be a moderator. Look at you, "Back to the sexz0rs". Knowin there's minors in this forum board. You have no respect.
Shit there should be an investigation on the forum boards... let the authorities and the parents of these kids (majority) take a look as to what you provoke, instigate, and bring to these kids vision and thoughts. Actually, you're no better than a pedophile.

she's a great mod, so back the f**k up with that.

why don't you just leave all the little kids on here alone and stick topics that are on your level?

[austinoutloud]

So ends the heated debate. Go JC! Just reading through this thread gave me a good 3 minutes of entertainment

[illriginal]

she's a great mod, so back the f**k up with that.

why don't you just leave all the little kids on here alone and stick topics that are on your level?

And sex is on the little kids' level?... that's right, keep diggin that hole.

[brooklyneast05]

And sex is on the little kids' level?... that's right, keep diggin that hole.

who the hell cares what they wanna talk about? you don't have to talk about something if you don't like what they are talking about.

[Heathasm]

So ends the heated debate. Go JC! Just reading through this thread gave me a good 3 minutes of entertainment

So ends the heated debate. Go JC! Just reading through this thread gave me a good 3 minutes of entertainment

?

Reason for edit: posts merged -superficial

[brooklyneast05]

anyway back on topic, i wouldn't do anyone on cb

[illriginal]

who the hell cares what they wanna talk about? you don't have to talk about something if you don't like what they are talking about.

You do realize it is against the law and punishable by federal prison to promote any sort of sexual activities in person or even over the internet (whether it's a video, picture, literature, or sound) to a minor/child, which is below the age of 18. Right?

So in a sense you're sayin, "who the hell cares that you find this sort of talk disrespectful, we're still gonna do it"

[brooklyneast05]

You do realize it is against the law and punishable by federal prison to promote any sort of sexual activities (whether it's a video, picture, literature, or sound) to a minor/child, which is below the age of 18. Right?

So in a sense you're sayin, "who the hell cares that you find this sort of talk disrespectful, we're still gonna do it"

what sexual activity is being promoted?

they're going to talk about it regardless. we can't limit harmless convo. what do you want done about it? us to warn anyone under a certain age who mentions sex in any way? i mean i just don't see what you're suggesting...

[Just_Dream]

Like I said, if showing off private parts to another person of the same sex only proves how "secure" you are about your sexuality then you can call me insecure.

Question: Based on your insecurity, do you also fear that Tung will take a screenshot and BAM everyone on cB will see your goods? Because if so, then it's understandable. Yes I know I'm kind of going on a tangent here, but this could also be another reason why you'd feel insecure. I know FURSHUR that I wouldn't post any form of nudez of myself because it'll definitely find its way to all my friends. Well okay, more like full nudez, but you get my drift.


Carry on.



EDIT - I'd do Cliff.

[illriginal]

what sexual activity is being promoted?

they're going to talk about it regardless. we can't limit harmless convo. what do you want done about it? us to warn anyone under a certain age who mentions sex in any way? i mean i just don't see what you're suggesting...

No... you're supposed to delete the thread and warn the person from doin it again. This is common policy on any forum board. It follows internet policies, you do realize there's laws for internet use, right?

Even on the bodybuilding forum board I go to... doesn't allow this sort of topic, "insertion, penetration, love making". And majority of members are 18+. But because there's kids who are in highschool under the legal age, they don't allow it.

[pandora]

I realize you still have me blocked, but:

Can you for once make a thread about somethin intellectual? For f**k sake.. you're so damn typical it's laughable.

...Have you actually looked at all his topics? Because half the more recent threads in the debate forum were created by him.

The fact that you're asian and speakin of bad grammar and small dick is even more laughable and ironic at the same time bwuahahahaha

What does being Asian have to do with bad grammar?

Right and your involvement is any better? You shouldn't even be a moderator. Look at you, "Back to the sexz0rs". Knowin there's minors in this forum board. You have no respect.
Shit there should be an investigation on the forum boards... let the authorities and the parents of these kids (majority) take a look as to what you provoke, instigate, and bring to these kids vision and thoughts. Actually, you're no better than a pedophile.

I guess you should just leave if you don't like it.

Sex isn't something I feel people should be shy about. It's not like we support 13 year olds having sex, in fact I'm pretty sure that there have been a number of times where a 13 year old might have responded to a thread like this and got their ear blown off by us because they shouldn't be having sex to begin with. We're no worse than tv, anyway. If people want to talk about sex, I don't see what the problem is, especially since we are offering them a safe and controlled venue to do so in.

And on another note, back the f**k off our staff. How can you even attempt to pass judgment on Sarah? You don't know all the f**king work she does here and behind the scenes, so shut your f**king mouth.

[Just_Dream]

Wow something to deleted. nb4 anyone denies it!

[brooklyneast05]

No... you're supposed to delete the thread and warn the person from doin it again. This is common policy on any forum board. It follows internet policies, you do realize there's laws for internet use, right?

Even on the bodybuilding forum board I go to... doesn't allow this sort of topic, "insertion, penetration, love making". And majority of members are 18+. But because there's kids who are in highschool under the legal age, they don't allow it.

that forum sounds like a really moral place and all, just perfect for you. you should commit fully to it maybe.

i still don't see how this thread is harming anyone

[misoshiru]

EDIT - I'd do Cliff.

I'd do you.

[brooklyneast05]

I'd do you.

thats against the rules of the internet yanlin. please refrain from saying things like that or i will have to kick you off cb.

I realize you still have me blocked, but:

Can you for once make a thread about somethin intellectual? For f**k sake.. you're so damn typical it's laughable.

...Have you actually looked at all his topics? Because half the more recent threads in the debate forum were created by him.

The fact that you're asian and speakin of bad grammar and small dick is even more laughable and ironic at the same time bwuahahahaha

What does being Asian have to do with bad grammar?

Right and your involvement is any better? You shouldn't even be a moderator. Look at you, "Back to the sexz0rs". Knowin there's minors in this forum board. You have no respect.
Shit there should be an investigation on the forum boards... let the authorities and the parents of these kids (majority) take a look as to what you provoke, instigate, and bring to these kids vision and thoughts. Actually, you're no better than a pedophile.

I guess you should just leave if you don't like it.

Sex isn't something I feel people should be shy about. It's not like we support 13 year olds having sex, in fact I'm pretty sure that there have been a number of times where a 13 year old might have responded to a thread like this and got their ear blown off by us because they shouldn't be having sex to begin with. We're no worse than tv, anyway. If people want to talk about sex, I don't see what the problem is, especially since we are offering them a safe and controlled venue to do so in.

And on another note, back the f**k off our staff. How can you even attempt to pass judgment on Sarah? You don't know all the f**king work she does here and behind the scenes, so shut your f**king mouth.

dats wuz ^

[illriginal]

thats against the rules of the internet yanlin. please refrain from saying things like that or i will have to kick you off cb.

Hey, whatever bro... who ever owns this account (website/forum) is the one that's gonna end up losing it and his life (prison) all because of the mods and their lack of recognizing what's right from wrong.

/end discussion

[brooklyneast05]

Hey, whatever bro... who ever owns this account (website/forum) is the one that's gonna end up losing it and his life (prison) all because of the mods and their lack of recognizing what's right from wrong.

/end discussion

i duno. you and i clearly disagree on the severity of what's going on here. so i guess we just agree to disagree.

[pandora]

Uh, it's not against the law to talk about sex on a forum, even if minors are present. I'm pretty sure I have a fair understanding of "internet laws" and the stipulations therein... I do work in the industry afterall...

[brooklyneast05]

Uh, it's not against the law to talk about sex on a forum, even if minors are present. I'm pretty sure I have a fair understanding of "internet laws" and the stipulations therein... I do work in the industry afterall...

good point

[S-Majere]

Only joking

Carry on ya'all.

[*Steven*]

Who on cB do you think it would be a blast to get jiggy with (na na na na na na na)? Don't just pick someone because they're hot, you have to keep in mind that if they've got a dull and boring personality, they might not be very creative.

man I even made a more pc thread.

Reason for edit: posts merged -superficial

[tokyo-rose]

Merged with Steven's "jiggy" thread.

[*Steven*]

nanananananana

[misoshiru]

thats against the rules of the internet yanlin. please refrain from saying things like that or i will have to kick you off cb.

OHNOEZ. fail.

[fameONE]

Tamacracker:

If you have a problem with my threads, don't post in them. You already made an ass out of yourself in the Barack Obama thread, so I'm not surprised that you did the same in this one. I'll post whatever the fcuk I feel like posting. Whether you're hopping on my nuts in a hiphop thread, I'm throwing jabs of political commentary in the debate forum, or if I intentionally make a dumb post like this just to liven things up, you don't have a say-so in shit. If you have a problem, go post on BlogRing.

[Tung]

Actually the penal codes for computer online related sex crimes are:

- Kidnapping/Enticing: Talking to the minor on private chat, and either coming to their home, or being invited by the minor to come over.
- Distributing lewd material to minors: Such as showing any private parts such as your gentilia to a minor, or showing pictures of porn to a minor, even if he/she is willing or unwilling to see it. For this case, talking openly about sex, and having minors around is a bit of a tough one. However, from registering on createblog, they know the diversity of broad topics that are presented here, so they should understand if they don't want to be harassed or be offended in any form, should not click to open sex related topics.
- Stalking: If you're stalking a minor online, such as finding out their myspace, facebook, email, instant messenger, etc. Constantly googling them to know everything about them.
- Harassing: Constant harassment of a minor such as egging them on and so forth, when they clearly told you to back off. Constant actions is actually illegal.

[fameONE]

Actually the penal codes for computer online related sex crimes are:

- Kidnapping/Enticing: Talking to the minor on private chat, and either coming to their home, or being invited by the minor to come over.
- Distributing lewd material to minors: Such as showing any private parts such as your gentilia to a minor, or showing pictures of porn to a minor, even if he/she is willing or unwilling to see it. For this case, talking openly about sex, and having minors around is a bit of a tough one. However, from registering on createblog, they know the diversity of broad topics that are presented here, so they should understand if they don't want to be harassed or be offended in any form, should not click to open sex related topics.
- Stalking: If you're stalking a minor online, such as finding out their myspace, facebook, email, instant messenger, etc. Constantly googling them to know everything about them.
- Harassing: Constant harassment of a minor such as egging them on and so forth, when they clearly told you to back off. Constant actions is actually illegal.

Gold star for Tung.

[stephinika]

Oh snap!

Just had to say that, but anyways....back to the topic y'all!!


Like I said earlier, Michelle, Roxy, Trish...they're all girls. Oh dear, haha. Ruth seems pretty fiesty too, lol!

[superstitious]

Weird how penal is just two letters off from penis.

/end random

[pandora]

What is happening here? First your post in the debate forum, and now this? +200pts for Tung.

[illriginal]

good point

It's not a good point... lol you can't acknowledge that you have registered users at the age of no less than 13 years old... and then have them exposed to adult material. It's against the internet law. You'd have many many many many counts of negligence a lone.

By the way... my lady works in Law -.-

[fameONE]

Weird how penal is just two letters off from penis.

/end random

*spanking for you, Rebs*

...in a non-sexual way so my girlfriend doesn't castrate me.