Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

People's Republic of Pennsylvania, Mua ha ha ha
ComradeRed
post Jun 20 2004, 08:49 PM
Post #1


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



I just got back from the NFL Congress, where I placed into the IDEP International Legislative Debate Round! Woo hoo! I found it unfair that the kids from China and Russia had their own country, so I declared Pennsylvania a sovereign nation as well, fully able to nullify the laws passed by the UN. So my question is:

Should the UN be a legislative body? As in should it act like a World Congress?
 
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 4)
JlIaTMK
post Jun 22 2004, 06:33 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 7,048
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 22,696



im fine with the UN being a type of World Congress

i think it will nullify many wars
 
Spirited Away
post Jun 22 2004, 07:05 PM
Post #3


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(ComradeRed @ Jun 20 2004, 8:49 PM)
I just got back from the NFL Congress, where I placed into the IDEP International Legislative Debate Round! Woo hoo! I found it unfair that the kids from China and Russia had their own country, so I declared Pennsylvania a sovereign nation as well, fully able to nullify the laws passed by the UN. So my question is:

Is it like Model United Nations?

QUOTE
Should the UN be a legislative body? As in should it act like a World Congress?

But if the world has a legislative body, shouldn't it be balanced with a judicial and executive branches?... erm... checks and balances.. you know? Okay... I'll go away now.
 
ComradeRed
post Jun 22 2004, 08:36 PM
Post #4


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



Yes I'm opposed to a World Congress for that precise reason. Not so much an executive branch, but a powerful judiciary capable of nullifying unjust legislation is of prime importance.
 
Spirited Away
post Jun 22 2004, 09:32 PM
Post #5


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(ComradeRed @ Jun 22 2004, 8:36 PM)
Yes I'm opposed to a World Congress for that precise reason. Not so much an executive branch, but a powerful judiciary capable of nullifying unjust legislation is of prime importance.

And who would be indifferent and unbiased enough to sit in the Judiciary branch? Wouldn't we have to make a whole different "UN" for that purpose, right?
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: