Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

Chicken or Egg
BeyondElite
post Jun 20 2004, 12:18 PM
Post #1


Senior Member.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,619
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 12,940



What cam first, the Chicken or the Egg? In my opinion, I think the Chicken came first.
 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 36)
JlIaTMK
post Jun 20 2004, 12:30 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 7,048
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 22,696



theres been another topic on this
 
BeyondElite
post Jun 20 2004, 12:36 PM
Post #3


Senior Member.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,619
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 12,940



oh sorry.
 
darkphyre
post Jun 20 2004, 09:08 PM
Post #4


dude, where's your brain?
***

Group: Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 22,426



The egg. It's a fact.
 
alexis5489
post Jun 21 2004, 08:10 AM
Post #5


.Summa Mam`ii,
***

Group: Member
Posts: 93
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 11,460



The egg, a chicken cant be born w.o an egg,duhhh? blink.gif
 
sheepy
post Jul 9 2004, 12:26 PM
Post #6


dizzy me up.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,191
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 11,139



hahah but if the egg came first, who born dat egg?
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 9 2004, 01:11 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
hahah but if the egg came first, who born dat egg?

An egg was laid by another species that had a mutation.. the mutation was found favorable by the environment and survived to become what is now known as the chicken while the original species died out.. thus the egg came before the chicken
 
Sumiaki
post Jul 9 2004, 01:13 PM
Post #8


NO WAI! R u Srs?
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,264
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,094



QUOTE
An egg was laid by another species that had a mutation.. the mutation was found favorable by the environment and survived to become what is now known as the chicken while the original species died out.. thus the egg came before the chicken


EGGsactly!!!! laugh.gif
 
empyrean
post Jul 9 2004, 01:15 PM
Post #9


await the end
***

Group: Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,387



QUOTE
An egg was laid by another species that had a mutation.. the mutation was found favorable by the environment and survived to become what is now known as the chicken while the original species died out.. thus the egg came before the chicken


well then the first "prototype" or w/e you wanna call it of the chicken was the other species with the mutation which laid the egg, even technically it wasnt exactly a chicken it had to have the correct genes to lay an actual chicken
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 9 2004, 01:20 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
well then the first "prototype" or w/e you wanna call it of the chicken was the other species with the mutation which laid the egg, even technically it wasnt exactly a chicken it had to have the correct genes to lay an actual chicken

No.. it was another species.. not a chicken..

If you want to be technical and argue that the chicken came before the chicken egg... then sure, I agree.. but eggs were in existence far longer than chickens were
 
Spirited Away
post Jul 9 2004, 10:39 PM
Post #11


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 9 2004, 1:20 PM)
No.. it was another species.. not a chicken..

If you want to be technical and argue that the chicken came before the chicken egg... then sure, I agree.. but eggs were in existence far longer than chickens were

What if...

The chicken was the mutation, as opposed to the egg being the mutation?

That way, the chicken was mutated into... the chicken and they laid the egg?

Uh.. I actually don't know if that's possible. Ignore me.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 9 2004, 10:40 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
What if...

The chicken was the mutation, as opposed to the egg being the mutation?

That way, the chicken was mutated into... the chicken and they laid the egg?

Uh.. I actually don't know if that's possible. Ignore me.

Yeah.. I dont think that's possible..

There'd have to be extremely unusual circumstances for that to happen.. and I'm still not sure natural selection works that way..
 
Spirited Away
post Jul 9 2004, 10:57 PM
Post #13


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 9 2004, 10:40 PM)
There'd have to be extremely unusual circumstances for that to happen.. and I'm still not sure natural selection works that way..

With natural selection, I think the chicken have a better chance of surviving and protecting its egg and chicks. While the egg is practically useless... well.. except for the proteins... but that's another story.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 9 2004, 11:02 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
With natural selection, I think the chicken have a better chance of surviving and protecting its egg and chicks. While the egg is practically useless... well.. except for the proteins... but that's another story.

Err.. I dont think you get it..

Its not comparing the chicken or the egg.. its comparing the chicken and the species that came before it..

Some mutation in the eggs of the previous species was obviously favorable and thus the species died out and the chicken survived
 
inlonelinessidie
post Jul 9 2004, 11:06 PM
Post #15


BANNED
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,419
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 14,387



Chickegg

It's like saying what came first the baby or the adult. Which will later bring the whole topic of God or Evolution
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 9 2004, 11:07 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
Chickegg

It's like saying what came first the baby or the adult. Which will later bring the whole topic of God or Evolution 

Erm... what? I'm confused.. how does this tie into religion?
 
Spirited Away
post Jul 9 2004, 11:09 PM
Post #17


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 9 2004, 11:02 PM)
Err.. I dont think you get it..

Er, 'fraid I don't _unsure.gif.

QUOTE
Its not comparing the chicken or the egg.. its comparing the chicken and the species that came before it.
Some mutation in the eggs of the previous species was obviously favorable and thus the species died out and the chicken survived


But you know what I noticed? When they make movies where something is created (alien or mutated life form), that creation usually is in the form of its earliest stage...
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 9 2004, 11:11 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
But you know what I noticed? When they make movies where something is created (alien or mutated life form), that creation usually is in the form of its earliest stage...

Haha.. that would be Hollywood

What do you mean by earliest stage? You're talking radical mutation.. natural selection utilizes gradual mutation
 
inlonelinessidie
post Jul 9 2004, 11:13 PM
Post #19


BANNED
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,419
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 14,387



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 9 2004, 9:07 PM)
Erm... what? I'm confused.. how does this tie into religion?

lol not the chicken thing. The whole adult human vs baby human thing . . . eh nevermind tongue.gif
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 9 2004, 11:15 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
lol not the chicken thing. The whole adult human vs baby human thing . . . eh nevermind 

Erm... ok then! _smile.gif
 
Spirited Away
post Jul 9 2004, 11:15 PM
Post #21


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 9 2004, 11:11 PM)
What do you mean by earliest stage? You're talking radical mutation.. natural selection utilizes gradual mutation

Okay, you're talking gibberish... because I don't seem to understand those words... g-r-a-d-u-a-l mutation....

I meant they grow test tube babies into adults, and little furbies grew up to be ugly and killer furbies... i can't seem to remember one valid example... ignore me, please.
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 9 2004, 11:23 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
Okay, you're talking gibberish... because I don't seem to understand those words... g-r-a-d-u-a-l mutation....

I meant they grow test tube babies into adults, and little furbies grew up to be ugly and killer furbies... i can't seem to remember one valid example... ignore me, please.

Haha sorrie

Basically what I'm saying is that in the movies, something is mutated some way to create this radically different (and usually dangerous) new species

In real life, it doesnt work that way..

Mutations are very gradual.. some huge change (like fish to land) simply doesnt happen.. it takes several steps.. several thousand years of natural selection weeding out the weak for the favorable mutations to dominate and thrive while the unfavorable die off
 
Sumiaki
post Jul 10 2004, 02:32 AM
Post #23


NO WAI! R u Srs?
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,264
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,094



Geeze dont you guys recall Darwin in bio class? Deeng seriously.

1. They adapt to conditions
2. There are mutations (sometimes good sometimes bad)
The beneficial mutated ones live because they are "better" than their ancestor. Think of it as competition. As the ancestors die off, the mutated ones become the norm. The cycle keeps goin and goin. Mutations are natural, like animals with more arms/legs and such. You just dont see alot of em around cuz the extra arm/leg is usually useless. I can go on and on but ill stop here. happy.gif
 
babygurl_xtacy
post Jul 10 2004, 02:33 AM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 279
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 6,406



egg.. because.. chickens come from eggs
 
School_Boy
post Jul 10 2004, 05:09 AM
Post #25


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,015
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 19,510



Well....the chicken needs to be born from an egg but then an egg needs to come out from the chicken......so....it would be neither....rite? huh.gif
 
angel-roh
post Jul 10 2004, 10:14 AM
Post #26


i'm susan
********

Group: Official Member
Posts: 13,875
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 5,029



QUOTE(JlIaTMK @ Jun 20 2004, 10:30 AM)
theres been another topic on this

yes, there is a topic about this, but oh wells...


i say the chicken cause God didn't create Adam and Eve when they were a baby, but God created them as an adult. so yeah i would say the chicken
 
rnrn897
post Jul 10 2004, 12:34 PM
Post #27


^ moo...
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 962
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 25,212



HEY! EGGS CAME FIRST... NOT CHICKEN EGGS BUT DINOSAUR EGGS
 
*CEP*
post Jul 10 2004, 12:37 PM
Post #28





Guest






QUOTE(rnrn897 @ Jul 10 2004, 10:34 AM)
HEY! EGGS CAME FIRST... NOT CHICKEN EGGS BUT DINOSAUR EGGS

Dinosaur eggs produce dinosaurs, dude.
The mutated dinosaur egg(chicken egg) produces chicken.

And typing in CAPS don't make you sound any smarter.
In fact, it makes you sound like an illiterate trying to throw yourself in a conversation.

- Chinkieeyedpnoi
 
EmeraldKnight
post Jul 10 2004, 11:39 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,795
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,421



QUOTE
Dinosaur eggs produce dinosaurs, dude.
The mutated dinosaur egg(chicken egg) produces chicken.

And typing in CAPS don't make you sound any smarter.
In fact, it makes you sound like an illiterate trying to throw yourself in a conversation.

- Chinkieeyedpnoi

Did the question ask specifically for chicken eggs? The topic merely states "Chicken or Egg"

Ooh.. I see you're a mod once again.. whistling.gif
 
Nashvixen
post Feb 27 2005, 05:54 PM
Post #30


candy shopper
***

Group: Member
Posts: 34
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 89,338



hehe...
I have the all-truthful answer to the question:
What came first... the chicken or the egg?
The answer is simple you see...
The egg came first... the chicken second...
Breakfast comes before dinner... DUH!
 
potmonkeyjd
post Feb 27 2005, 05:58 PM
Post #31


Philly Girl 4-life
***

Group: Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Feb 2005
Member No: 105,772



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 9 2004, 11:11 AM)
An egg was laid by another species that had a mutation.. the mutation was found favorable by the environment and survived to become what is now known as the chicken while the original species died out.. thus the egg came before the chicken
*


That's what I've heard, now me believein it.. thats a whole diff. thing, I guess i really like the mystery, the why are we here how'd whe get here thing, i like checkin out all the diff. religions and thier beliefs.
fallen.gif
 
yukichan
post Feb 28 2005, 01:42 AM
Post #32


I'll never be who I was again..
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,886
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 77,981



QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ Jul 9 2004, 8:11 AM)
An egg was laid by another species that had a mutation.. the mutation was found favorable by the environment and survived to become what is now known as the chicken while the original species died out.. thus the egg came before the chicken
*


ya..thats what i was thinking..
 
*xcaitlinx*
post Feb 28 2005, 07:03 AM
Post #33





Guest






egg. because for a chicken to be created, there must be a source. that source being a hatched egg.
 
pAtRiCk_sTar
post Feb 28 2005, 03:08 PM
Post #34


jellyfishing, jellyfishing
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,174
Joined: Oct 2004
Member No: 55,185



Egg came first....cause then the chicken couldn't have formed out of nothing, right? rolleyes.gif
 
picaso_smile
post Feb 28 2005, 03:52 PM
Post #35


Seien Sie bitte mein Geliebter!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 660
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 43,436



Whichever one came first, poped out of nowhere. If the egg came first it would never get passed an egg stage. It would need a mother chicken to help incuabate it.

It's no the chicken or the egg. It's two chickens.


Oooorr... to support my opinion literally... "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" The chicken of course. Because "the chicken" came before "the egg".
Tada!
 
heyyfrankie
post Feb 28 2005, 05:37 PM
Post #36


This bitch better work!
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,681
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,095



the egg. after the chicken hatched, then it made more eggs! happy.gif
 
*tweeak*
post Feb 28 2005, 05:59 PM
Post #37





Guest






i dont understand where this one reappeared from, but it was definitely closed before because theres other ones elsewhere, and i was deemed as not enough of a debate

sooooo

topic closed
 

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: