Question! |
 Oct 4 2007, 11:13 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Is it summer yet?  Group: Member Posts: 817 Joined: Nov 2006 Member No: 477,032  |
IDK if I should buy these (they're $120 plus S&H):
 Yay or nay? |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 28)
|
Oct 4 2007, 11:24 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 |
ugly.
|
|
|
|
| *Steven* |
Oct 4 2007, 11:25 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
Are those some of those Ugg boots? Coming from a guy, I think 120$ on a pair of shoes you'll probly hardly wear (based on what I've observed of girls and shoes) is impractical. I'd save your money :)
Besides, they don't even look that good :) They look like hiking boots, not nice shoes. edit: Tung said what I wanted to say in one word, kudos. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 11:32 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 Lurker. Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,161 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,851 |
I think they're ugly. But then again, I'm not a big fan of uggs.
and I wouldn't pay $120 for that. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 11:34 PM
Post
#5
|
|
 in a matter of time Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,151 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 191,357 |
I don't like them...but some people do look cute in them. I just prefer a sleek, simple boot as opposed to one with laces and fur peeking out from underneath.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 12:40 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
!~@*&+;$ Group: Member Posts: 1,033 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 579,371 |
i wouldn't wear them but then again i prefer my boots somewhat simple, slouchy and black, grey or white. it's just so much easier to match then something with tons of lace and fur. i guess it depends on your style and what you are planning to wear with it, your choice.
+http://www.revolveclothing.com/DisplayProd...s=C&d=Shoes |
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 11:53 AM
Post
#7
|
|
 :electro[u]nique: Group: Member Posts: 148 Joined: Aug 2007 Member No: 561,877 |
i think they're ugly.
and too expensive. they don't look that well put together for $120. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 11:59 AM
Post
#8
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 299 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 457,013 |
I wouldn't pay $120 for a pair of boots..or any other one piece of clothing/shoes for the matter.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 12:08 PM
Post
#9
|
|
 I am not afraid, I was born for this. Group: Official Member Posts: 805 Joined: Aug 2007 Member No: 565,063 |
Ew, they shot.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 12:34 PM
Post
#10
|
|
 [BRITT;;] Group: Member Posts: 764 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 433,210 |
no offense, but ew. ;/
|
|
|
|
| *stephinika* |
Oct 5 2007, 03:08 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Guest |
Eh. Not my style. I'd pay $200 for boots, but not those boots to be perfectly honest. You could probably find some that are nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 07:58 PM
Post
#12
|
|
 courtneeeey :) Group: Member Posts: 420 Joined: Mar 2006 Member No: 386,316 |
Deff nay. Normal Uggs look better, and they're similar. You should get those instead. The one's with the paisley print are pretty cool. Aaaand they're pretty much the same price.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2007, 11:39 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
<3 Group: Member Posts: 455 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 445,104 |
You can find better looking boots that cost a lot cheaper. I won't spend $120 on that.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2007, 12:14 AM
Post
#14
|
|
 well, if practice makes perfect then im relaxin at rehearsal Group: Member Posts: 329 Joined: May 2007 Member No: 529,475 |
nay
because u can find a similar pair for a whole lot less sum where else. |
|
|
|
| *Michelle* |
Oct 6 2007, 11:21 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Guest |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2007, 09:58 PM
Post
#16
|
|
 eat your heart out ! Group: Official Designer Posts: 193 Joined: May 2007 Member No: 526,306 |
i hate them and if its real fur then heck no
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:28 PM
Post
#17
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 193 Joined: Jun 2007 Member No: 537,000 |
ew. they remind me of mountain climbing boots...
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:34 PM
Post
#18
|
|
 I'm Jc Group: Mentor Posts: 13,619 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 437,556 |
besides looking like shit
they look really cheap too i don't get why anyone would want this shit, unless they were trapping wild game in snowy mountains |
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:37 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 153 Joined: Sep 2007 Member No: 575,648 |
QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Oct 8 2007, 10:34 PM)  besides looking like shit they look really cheap too i don't get why anyone would want this shit, unless they were trapping wild game in snowy mountains ditto |
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2007, 02:06 AM
Post
#20
|
|
 yan lin♥ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,129 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 13,627 |
nay. want good winter boots, get uggs.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2007, 03:46 PM
Post
#21
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 59 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 580,537 |
eeeeeek. i don't like them, personally. i think your money would be better spent on a nice pair of black/brown knee-high boots that can be dressed up or down with anything. they can also be worn in the spring and winter, so you get your moneys worth.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 07:33 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Is it summer yet? Group: Member Posts: 817 Joined: Nov 2006 Member No: 477,032 |
QUOTE(misoshiru @ Oct 9 2007, 03:06 AM) nay. want good winter boots, get uggs. Those are Uggs. LOL. I guess I'll go with the regular Uggs. But... Short?  Or tall? 
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2007, 11:14 PM
Post
#23
|
|
 bliss. Group: Member Posts: 735 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,566 |
yeah regular uggs are better looking
go with the short ones |
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2007, 06:40 PM
Post
#24
|
|
 long time no CB. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,889 Joined: Jan 2007 Member No: 493,502 |
QUOTE(lovefooled @ Oct 15 2007, 07:33 PM) Those are Uggs. LOL. I guess I'll go with the regular Uggs. But... Short? http://www.zappos.com/images/722/7222040/985-25271-p.jpg Or tall? http://www.zappos.com/images/736/7362085/7954-508539-p.jpg I like the short ones better. Stick to them  and I have the ones that you asked about in your first post |
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2007, 06:44 PM
Post
#25
|
|
 :) Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 1,636 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 34,459 |
Definitely not, those are not worth it. They are ugly.
And as far as the uggs, I'd go with short. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 19 2007, 03:59 AM
Post
#26
|
|
|
yan lin♥ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,129 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 13,627 |
QUOTE(lovefooled @ Oct 16 2007, 08:33 AM) Those are Uggs. LOL. I guess I'll go with the regular Uggs. But... Short? Or tall? srsly? then they're hella ugly uggs. get long ones. they're warmer. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2007, 11:40 AM
Post
#27
|
|
 Its Kayla Baby! Group: Member Posts: 57 Joined: Jun 2007 Member No: 533,067 |
Short original ugg boots look good with boyfriend jeans and an oversized hoody :)
I dont like the ones posted in the first post, they're ugly. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2007, 03:44 PM
Post
#28
|
|
 Ms. Granger Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 735 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 165,238 |
Where do you people get all this money...
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 1 2007, 05:07 PM
Post
#29
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 30 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 585,251 |
Ew. Just go with short uggs. They're hella comfy :D
|
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: