110 lbs is fat?! |
 May 18 2007, 05:54 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Newbie  Group: Member Posts: 8 Joined: May 2007 Member No: 522,732  |
Yep.
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 48)
| *steve330* |
May 18 2007, 06:04 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
^
Toothpicks = t3h HAWT! Personally, I like toothpicks because I can stick them into my hole. It's kind of a reverse-roleplay. |
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 06:04 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 310 Joined: Dec 2006 Member No: 489,303 |
I don`t consider that fat. :) But nowadays, so many people are too body conscious; 80lbs. is NOT healthy.
|
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 06:06 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 High Voltage!∞ Group: Official Member Posts: 4,728 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,157 |
No, I don't consider that fat.
I heard/read somewhere that for every five feet, you should be a hundred pounds. So, you shouldn't worry. It's just certain people's misconception of what is "fat" because of what the media puts out there. And not all people who are "toothpicks" chose to be that way. They have fast metabolisms, and many of them would actually want to gain a few pounds. Nobody should have to starve themselves to make themselves happy with themselves, but unfortunately, it happens. 
|
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 06:10 PM
Post
#5
|
|
 show me a garden thats bursting to life Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
Who cares what everyone else says? Just pay attention to what your freaking Doctor, the guy who knows more about nutrition than anyone else, except for a nutritionist, and no one else.
And it's not fat. Gosh. |
|
|
|
| *steve330* |
May 18 2007, 06:11 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Guest |
@ Universal
So should a 6 foot person weigh 120 lbs? And a 6'4'' person weigh 126.66 lbs? If so I'm incredibly obese weighing in at a whopping 180 lbs. |
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 06:13 PM
Post
#7
|
|
 we go a-drowning Group: Member Posts: 964 Joined: Apr 2007 Member No: 519,725 |
i hope to god that that doesnt count as fat or im OBESE! ahh.
seriously though, i have curves and i like it somehowthe little black dress looks sexier in the 130 pounder with curves than the straight, flat 100 pounder. and yeah, as mentioned above, some peoples motabolism acts faster and everyone is different, so i dont think its fair to call the 100 pound girl a tooth pick, just like it isnt fair to call the girl weighing 130 pounds a fatty. |
|
|
|
| *steve330* |
May 18 2007, 06:16 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Guest |
It is fair to call them a fatty if they are as wide as they are tall. But yeah, metabolisms / genetics play big rolls, through genetics can easily be overcome if you work @ it. And yeah, Muscle > Fat so muscular people can be smaller than fat people and still weigh more.
|
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 06:16 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
High Voltage!∞ Group: Official Member Posts: 4,728 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,157 |
QUOTE(steve330 @ May 18 2007, 4:11 PM)  @ Universal So should a 6 foot person weigh 120 lbs? And a 6'4'' person weigh 126.66 lbs? If so I'm incredibly obese weighing in at a whopping 180 lbs. ..? I saiid I read/heard somewhere. Which means you shouldn't take it too seriosuly.  Just don't take it to an exact extreme.. |
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 06:19 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
we go a-drowning Group: Member Posts: 964 Joined: Apr 2007 Member No: 519,725 |
yeah, and steve, the statistics are different for guys...
|
|
|
|
| *steve330* |
May 18 2007, 06:30 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Guest |
pfft. Can't yall see I'm being sarcastic? Hence first response lol
|
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 06:35 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
High Voltage!∞ Group: Official Member Posts: 4,728 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,157 |
QUOTE(steve330 @ May 18 2007, 4:30 PM) pfft. Can't yall see I'm being sarcastic? Hence first response lol  I thought you were only being sarcastic in the first post. It's hard to see sarcasm typed out, lol.Uhhm, anywas..back on topic.
|
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 18 2007, 06:36 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Guest |
5'2" You should be under 100.
Fatty. |
|
|
|
| *MyMichelle* |
May 18 2007, 06:41 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(AngelicEyz00 @ May 18 2007, 7:36 PM) 5'2" You should be under 100. Fatty. I must say I agree. |
|
|
|
| *steve330* |
May 18 2007, 06:43 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Guest |
You only say that because you wish you weren't 135 lbs/5 ft flat.
Michelle you seriously need to stop eating all that unhealthy food and you should get out and run w/ me... |
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 18 2007, 06:45 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Guest |
You put your girlfriend's weight on blast, ooooooooooh.
And I was kidding, 110 isn't fat at all for 5'2". |
|
|
|
| *MyMichelle* |
May 18 2007, 06:46 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Guest |
:O
I'M ACTUALLY ONLY 95 LBS, YOU FAT-ASS (STEVEN) YOU NEED TO LOSE SOME f**king WEIGHT, LAZY-LARD. I <3 you ;) |
|
|
|
| *steve330* |
May 18 2007, 06:53 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Guest |
Haha yeah. 100 lbs/5ft aint nuttin to squawk at.
Honestly, I'd rather just look at myself and see if I have any obvious bulges of fat protruding from my body. If so then that would kinda let me know how I'm doing healthwise :) Also big energy levels tend to one believe they're doing good. |
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 07:33 PM
Post
#19
|
|
 Member Group: Member Posts: 28 Joined: Apr 2007 Member No: 515,195 |
nah i don't think you're "fat"
and i agree with what you said 'bout the 80lbs "toothpick" people. they are not healthy at all. media portrays such bad images that adolescents look up to to consider them "normal." it's a bit sad actually ]: |
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 07:36 PM
Post
#20
|
|
 vengeance. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,058 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 437,024 |
wtf hell noooo.
|
|
|
|
| *karmakiller* |
May 18 2007, 08:13 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Guest |
Don't pay attention to the number, pay attention to your health.
Someone can be healthy at 140lbs. Someone else can be healthy at 90lbs. Just pay attention to your body and don't let your weight rule you. Your weight fluxuates daily, anyways. |
|
|
|
|
May 18 2007, 09:00 PM
Post
#22
|
|
 What a sick, masochistic lion. Group: Member Posts: 1,853 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 460,535 |
I don't. Those 110 pounds aren't pure fat; they're made up also of MUSCLE. Some people tend to have a more muscular body, so they can tend to weigh more sometimes. |
|
|
|
| *steve330* |
May 18 2007, 11:26 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Guest |
yup yup yup
past few posts have nailed it :) Like I used to be a lil chubbier than I am now, but since I've started working out I've gained a few lbs but gotten thinner. Had to get used to not measuring productivity in working out by what the scale said -.- One time I had neglected eating all day because I was trying to eat less and really hadn't much paid attention to my stomach. I mean I'm not anorexic or anything, but I just didn't really eat that day. I was @ this place while my girlfriend was getting her anti-brows pierced and I randomly fainted due to lack of food t.t |
|
|
|
| *stephinika* |
May 19 2007, 12:59 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Guest |
It depends on your height and health in general, not just the number that shows up on the scale. 110 lbs. is fine at that height...80 lbs. seems a little on the skinny side to say the least.
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2007, 07:39 AM
Post
#25
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001 |
That weight of yours is perfect. People are so fed up with fatness. i like girls with meat, you know. i dont find myself attracted to skinny girls. we need beautifulawesomegreattt people like you, healthy girls with meat.
 Now, that sounds corny.
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2007, 12:59 PM
Post
#26
|
|
 Hi, Im Brook. Group: Member Posts: 1,774 Joined: Mar 2007 Member No: 508,383 |
No, thats not fat. Weighting 80 is unhealthy especially if your in eighth grade or high school or even out of school. I weigh 105 (I dont look like it though I look like I should be 100)and im 14 but I have a fast matabulism.
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2007, 06:22 PM
Post
#27
|
|
 Kimberly Group: Member Posts: 1,961 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 121,599 |
Hell no, 110 is not fat. That's sounds like the ideal weight, for that height. But I guess it just depends on how you're built.
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2007, 09:39 PM
Post
#28
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Head Staff Posts: 18,173 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 108,478 |
For someone who is 5'2", I'm not sure. In America, it should be about average?
And yes, muscle weighs more than fat. |
|
|
|
|
May 19 2007, 09:40 PM
Post
#29
|
|
 i'm maggie =] Group: Member Posts: 3,607 Joined: Jan 2006 Member No: 361,616 |
personally, i think that natural women are much prettier.
show fat, dont be shy. this is what 95% of all women look like on this world. its just so annoying when the perception of beauty is altered by those who strut the runway. |
|
|
|
|
May 19 2007, 09:47 PM
Post
#30
|
|
 consistently inconsistent. Group: Member Posts: 509 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 74,128 |
QUOTE(UniversalRoyalty @ May 18 2007, 6:06 PM) I heard/read somewhere that for every five feet, you should be a hundred pounds. So for every foot, that's 20 lbs. Does that mean that girls who are 5'6"-5'10" who weigh 125-140 are overweight?  Having a weight like 80 lbs isn't healthy. I weigh about 105, and would still like to gain. 110 lbs is definitely NOT fat. People nowadays are too self-conscious. |
|
|
|
| *Intercourse.* |
May 20 2007, 10:57 AM
Post
#31
|
|
Guest |
uhm normally around here if your around 5-0 to 5-4 and your around 120 or under your look just fine
QUOTE People nowadays are too self-conscious. exactly. |
|
|
|
|
May 21 2007, 04:58 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 8 Joined: May 2007 Member No: 522,732 |
Yep.
|
|
|
|
| *Duchess_of_Dork* |
May 21 2007, 05:06 PM
Post
#33
|
|
Guest |
I love being curvy, quite frankly. I'm glad that you're proud of your figure. Good for you!
|
|
|
|
|
May 21 2007, 05:14 PM
Post
#34
|
|
 i've never wanted anything rationale. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 |
QUOTE(Duchess_of_Dork @ May 21 2007, 03:06 PM) I love being curvy, quite frankly. Ditto! I personally find most skinny girls to be unattractive. |
|
|
|
|
May 23 2007, 09:09 PM
Post
#35
|
|
 durian Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 13,124 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,860 |
110 lbs is normal for a girl who's 5'2. Don't compare yourself to Nicole Richie.
But I don't think 110 lbs. is normal for a guy who is 5'2. I think guys who are 5'4 should be around 110 lbs. 
|
|
|
|
|
May 31 2007, 09:03 PM
Post
#36
|
|
 yawn :) Group: Official Member Posts: 2,926 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 434,041 |
wow if 5'2 110pounds is fat then i am obese
i am 5'0 132...gawd i feel bad but anyways 80 pounds is on the skinny side unless you have like a fast metabolism or something. I hate the media and their perception of what they think is pretty. |
|
|
|
| *stephinika* |
May 31 2007, 09:56 PM
Post
#37
|
|
Guest |
^^
Agreed. There's slender/toned which is nice, but not really, really skinny. My assistant manager at work is so skinny and it bugs me because apparently lots of people think she's so "hot"...not really. |
|
|
|
|
May 31 2007, 10:01 PM
Post
#38
|
|
 t-t-totally dude. Group: Member Posts: 125 Joined: Oct 2006 Member No: 474,665 |
anorexic skinny, not cute, skinny but got a little sumthin sumthin, good! me...i'm....voluptuous. :]
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 08:26 PM
Post
#39
|
|
 The more things change,The more they stay the same. Group: Official Member Posts: 1,319 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 442,600 |
80 pounds?
Thats a little crazy. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 09:50 PM
Post
#40
|
|
|
I'm Cattt. :] Group: Validating Posts: 1,722 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 130,831 |
For 5'2, 110 is normal.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 09:53 PM
Post
#41
|
|
 ;) Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,573 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 99,124 |
110 pounds is definitely not fat. I weigh 114 pounds, and I'm no where near fat.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 10:05 PM
Post
#42
|
|
 define our lives for us. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 11,656 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 43,293 |
Yeah, it's all fat. Fat of skinniness.
Well, if that made sense. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 11:24 PM
Post
#43
|
|
|
c[: Group: Member Posts: 2,302 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 2,876 |
if you're fat then i'm a giant.
 i don't think it's fat at all. don't worry about what the public says. it's all in what you think. i'm superly huge, but i still pwn you! muwhar! 
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2007, 04:01 PM
Post
#44
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 105 Joined: Jun 2007 Member No: 530,627 |
Your weight doesn't really determine how you look, even when combined witht he height. Weight is distributed differently. Besides, muslce weights more than fat. That is why bmi isn't really all that accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2007, 04:09 PM
Post
#45
|
|
|
consistently inconsistent. Group: Member Posts: 509 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 74,128 |
Sometimes skinny girls can't really help their weight. I eat a LOT but I don't seem to gain any weight, and I know I'm underweight. But I'm not 80lbs. That's crazy.
|
|
|
|
| *steve330* |
Jun 4 2007, 03:35 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Guest |
^So true. Metabolism = very high in some people. I did some test type thing last summer and it ended up saying that I could eat 3000 calories a day, do absolutely nothing, and lose weight.
I, however, eat way more than 3000 calories a day rofl, but I don't gain. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 05:35 PM
Post
#47
|
|
 d@niel Group: Member Posts: 1,267 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,453 |
110 lbs...that depends on ur height, and ur body structure...either way, if u dont feel fat, dont listen to others...if ur naturally skinny, then ur skinny...if ur naturally curvy, stay curvy [look at scarlett johanssen]
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 05:36 PM
Post
#48
|
|
|
d@niel Group: Member Posts: 1,267 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,453 |
and i was like 80 pounds in 2nd grade
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 05:37 PM
Post
#49
|
|
|
d@niel Group: Member Posts: 1,267 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,453 |
but im not a girl, so...
|
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: