Staff Member/ Member of the Month |
Staff Member/ Member of the Month |
Feb 18 2007, 07:28 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Peggy. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,508 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 214,025 |
I am not sure if this is the right place to post this topic...
Anyway, I think the "Staff Member of the Month" and "Member of the Month" threads at the Lounge are mostly spam. Isn't that thread supposed to be nominatons and suggestions? The majority of the posts in these threads are "Congrats _______! You really deserve it." As I was skimming through replies in these threads, only like 4 or 5 replies are nominations, the other 30 something replies are those "Congrats!" spams or unnecessary arguments. If members want to congratulate the winners, they could just simply do it through PM or ALONG WITH THEIR NOMINATIONS. I know the staff votes out FROM THE NOMINATIONS, which the staff votes from the one or two people that got nominated (because there are only 4-5 people nominated, and usually the same people are being nominated, so the nominated members have like a 50% chance of winning). I don't mean that they don't deserve the SMoTM or MoTM, but could the amount of spam in these threads be reduced and add more nominations in? Just stating my own opinion. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 18 2007, 07:31 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
show me a garden thats bursting to life ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
What's wrong with congratulatory messages? It's relevant to the fact that they won M(S)OTM, so, why not post?
|
|
|
|
| *StanleyThePanda* |
Feb 18 2007, 07:34 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
Well, I personally don't see a problem with Congradulating the winner in the thread.
And also, I just read through the first page of SMOTM and read 10 nominations/suggestions, only on the first page... Sooooooooo, yeah. We staff usually end up with a handful or more of people to choose from, not 2-3. (I hope my post doesn't sound rude, or like I have an attitude, cause I don't. And I'm not trying to come off that way at all ^-^) The arguements I could definitely do without. heh. There is my 2 cents. |
|
|
|
| *Intercourse.* |
Feb 18 2007, 07:35 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
I agree with Kristina.
I think its fine for people to post, congratulating the winner. I mean I suppose I could see how it could be annoying but I think its fine? |
|
|
|
| *WHIMSICAL 0NE* |
Feb 18 2007, 07:40 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Guest |
I know this sounds odd, but who skims through if they're voting? I don't think it's a big problem, they just don't count the post as a vote. So if congratulating someone doesn't interfer with the votes I don't think it's a big deal.
|
|
|
|
| *annonymous.* |
Feb 18 2007, 08:46 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Guest |
I guess I'll add my 2 cents.
Honestly, I agree with all the people above. I don't think there is absolutely nothing wrong with congratulating the winner. What's so bad about that? |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2007, 01:42 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Home is where your rump rests! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,235 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 451,969 |
Just stating my own opinion. Why the smiley? Stating opinions is what this forum's for, and you backed up your opinion well. (:However, I disagree, mostly because I enjoy congrulating them in that thread; it's just how it's been and how it probably will be for as long as it exists. Having congratulations there doesn't, imo, discourage people from nominating others. And there are usually more than just two nominations, there's usually at least three. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |