Log In · Register

 
Woman Becomes Quadruple Amputee After Giving Birth
*Libertie*
post Jan 30 2007, 07:21 PM
Post #1





Guest






http://www.wftv.com/news/6253589/detail.html

WTF. So the woman gives birth, has no arms or legs, and when she asks what the hell happened.. "Oh, we can't tell you that. You're asking for information that would violate other patients' rights."
 
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 14)
voguelove
post Jan 30 2007, 07:23 PM
Post #2


i'm maggie =]
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,607
Joined: Jan 2006
Member No: 361,616



omg, thats horrible.

i thought tss was only in tampons? or can you get it from something else?
 
multifaceted
post Jan 30 2007, 10:44 PM
Post #3


I'm Cattt. :]
******

Group: Validating
Posts: 1,722
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 130,831



TSS happens most often to women who use tampons. But men, elder and young women, children can get TSS. That's why its not called Tampon Shock Syndrome.

That's just screwed. The flesh-eating (I think) bacteria is most of the time contracted in the hospital. That's why she was amputated I think. The hospital was probably responsible for that flesh-eating thing that's why they won't tell her where she caught the eating thing and why they needed to amputate the hands and legs, besides for the fact that it was flesh-eating. If they did, she can sue and the hospital will have to pay. With the strep thing, that is just bull. End of story.
 
*WHIMSICAL 0NE*
post Jan 30 2007, 11:06 PM
Post #4





Guest






Haha, Tampon Shock Syndrome.

I think that's horrible. You'd think they'd at least consult her before they chopped her arms and legs off. Them saying that she'd have to sue them to get answers just tells you that they effed something up. I wouldn't be able to deal with that if I was her. I would be so depressed, I feel bad for her.
 
me1issaaaa
post Jan 30 2007, 11:11 PM
Post #5



*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,066
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 18,393



What the hell. That is so horrible sad.gif I don't exactly know how to respond to that.
 
*StanleyThePanda*
post Jan 30 2007, 11:14 PM
Post #6





Guest






ohmy.gif Wow, I'd be pissed if that happened to me.
That is terrible.
 
pandamonium
post Jan 31 2007, 12:36 AM
Post #7


cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,316
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 37,142



QUOTE(StanleyThePanda @ Jan 30 2007, 11:14 PM) *
ohmy.gif Wow, I'd be pissed if that happened to me.
That is terrible.


thats it? lol i would be ballistic. thats sad though. i hope they tell her and then she wins her courtcase.
 
*My Cinderella.*
post Jan 31 2007, 01:05 AM
Post #8





Guest






Oh my. Waking up and figuring out that you're armless/legless and you've just given birth. Poor woman. sad.gif How can you do that and not tell them the full story? I hope that she wins that case.
 
espressive
post Jan 31 2007, 10:32 PM
Post #9


and so it is
******

Group: Human
Posts: 1,304
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,085



SUE THE FREAKIN HOSPITAL!
that's my two cents.

but seriously, her body must be seriously worn out. she just gave birth and then she became a basketcase in less than 2 weeks. pinch.gif oh, and i have a question that needs clarification. don't patients usually have to sign consent forms for surgeries? maybe i watch too much grey's anatomy & house.
 
Stefanny
post Jan 31 2007, 11:39 PM
Post #10


chinky
******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 2,566
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 434,437



Dang, this is really wrong.
I would be SO FREAKING PISSED OFF at the hospital if they did this to me. I'd definitely go and sue them.
Man, I feel so bad for this poor woman.
 
*a painefull euphoria*
post Jan 31 2007, 11:53 PM
Post #11





Guest






QUOTE(Lil_Cloud @ Feb 1 2007, 3:32 AM) *
SUE THE FREAKIN HOSPITAL!
that's my two cents.

but seriously, her body must be seriously worn out. she just gave birth and then she became a basketcase in less than 2 weeks. pinch.gif oh, and i have a question that needs clarification. don't patients usually have to sign consent forms for surgeries? maybe i watch too much grey's anatomy & house.



actualy its called implied consent if its lifethreating the hospital reserves the right to operate on you.
but then there are also some places that have partial implied consent in which they go to the husband or immediate family member ask ask them to sign a consent form on their behalf.
 
espressive
post Feb 1 2007, 12:18 AM
Post #12


and so it is
******

Group: Human
Posts: 1,304
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,085



QUOTE(a painefull euphoria @ Jan 31 2007, 10:53 PM) *
actualy its called implied consent if its lifethreating the hospital reserves the right to operate on you.
but then there are also some places that have partial implied consent in which they go to the husband or immediate family member ask ask them to sign a consent form on their behalf.

Can't those implied consent be vetoed by......erhmm.... I don't know what they're called. I job-shadowed a nurse, who worked in the ICU. Some patients signed this waiver that basically stated they didn't want to be saved if something goes wrong. I'm not sure if that applies to surgery, however. ermm.gif
 
ldyxluvable
post Feb 1 2007, 02:11 AM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 241
Joined: Oct 2006
Member No: 475,881



dangg thats sad
 
viugiufgjhfhjfhg...
post Feb 2 2007, 08:38 PM
Post #14


The one man Voltron
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Dec 2006
Member No: 491,519



QUOTE
Mejia said after she gave birth to Mathew last spring, she was kept in the hospital with complications. Twelve days after giving birth at Orlando Regional South Seminole hospital, she was transported to Orlando Regional Medical Center where she became a quadruple amputee. Now she can not care for or hold her baby.


This time gap is confusing, since the article doesn't fill it with any kind of useful information =|.

Then again, if she was affected with necrotzing fasciitis chances are that she spent those days under antibiotic treatment and/or went under surgery prior suffering the final amputation of her limbs. Keep in mind this affection has a mortality rate of 25% when treated properly, peeking at close to 98% when lacking proper medical attention.

Still, unless the Hospital is trying to cover its back from something along the lines of the patient becoming infected during the birth labor, there's no ethical reason to prevent the woman from seeing her medical records.
 
synthase
post Feb 4 2007, 06:16 PM
Post #15


ALLISON
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,372
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 310,259



thats so sad sad.gif
she wont even be able to hold her child
they should keep hospitals clean-er
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: