NEW TOPIC: bylaw discussion |
 Aug 11 2006, 10:17 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001  |
Does anyone have anything to discuss about? Recently, our fellow member would like to see us to continue with the bylaw. It had been really been dead for so long.
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 35)
|
Aug 11 2006, 10:28 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 What's my name? Janette. and ily. <3 Group: Member Posts: 2,139 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 391,911 |
What is wrong with the other topic? o_O
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 11 2006, 11:09 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001 |
huh. what is "other" topic?
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 11 2006, 11:12 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
What's my name? Janette. and ily. <3 Group: Member Posts: 2,139 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 391,911 |
The topic James made about having bylaws active again.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 11 2006, 11:26 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001 |
that one is different. i think.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 11 2006, 11:35 PM
Post
#6
|
|
 dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
there are two things that need to happen:
1- the bylaws need to be formally written up. 2- the bylaws need to be formally adopted. |
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Aug 12 2006, 07:13 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Spiritual Winged Aura @ Aug 12 2006, 5:26 AM)  that one is different. i think. it is in NO WAY different. you just seem to be too dense to comprehend the other topic. buffoon. Justin - Are we sure we've got everything covered? The issue before was with Jusun approving them... is that still necessary? |
|
|
|
| *Guest* |
Aug 12 2006, 08:57 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Guest |
Didn't Jusun decide on the advertising issue after that whole advertising/affiliation thread a while back? Besides that there's really nothing else that needs to be discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 12 2006, 07:46 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
as far as i'm concerned, the bylaws don't have to be approved by micron to be adopted.
sure, he can get rid of them if he doesn't like them, but untill he does, i don't think there's any reason not to adopt them. |
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 12 2006, 09:49 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Guest |
Isn't that why he, you know, removed himself as an admin? So that people wouldn't rely on him for things that don't concern him anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 13 2006, 12:33 AM
Post
#11
|
|
 Yawn Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,530 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,772 |
For some reason I thought that the by-laws were already in affect, alteast most of them. The hiring part changes each hiring session. It's hard setting that part in stone since the community keeps on changing and sometimes it's better with nominations and other times using the application method.
I guess they do need to be written out officially or whatever, I wasn't sure who was supposed to do that after the by-laws were completed? I think james maybe since all this was his idea? The current by-laws are basically complete...except under advertising it says "coming soon. be patient" or whatever, but i'm still not entirely sure what needs to be said about advertising on cb. I thought that advertising was just not allowed. period. If another issue comes up that needs to be addressed, someone makes up a topic in the by-law forum, and we talk about that problem or idea, and then the committee decides if it needs to be added to the by-laws. I never thought the by-laws would ever really be finished and set in stone, I always thought they would keep changing and things would be added in or taken out because this community changes. Atleast that is my take on it. I'm not entirely sure what everyone else thinks about this subject. But I do agree that we may need to replace a few people later on or now. Whenever the time is right. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 13 2006, 07:42 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001 |
QUOTE(Statues/Shadows @ Aug 12 2006, 7:49 PM) Isn't that why he, you know, removed himself as an admin? So that people wouldn't rely on him for things that don't concern him anymore? do you know what you're saying? |
|
|
|
|
Aug 13 2006, 09:52 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 145 Joined: May 2006 Member No: 416,166 |
QUOTE(Spiritual Winged Aura @ Aug 13 2006, 7:42 PM) do you know what you're saying? i do believe she does. let me explain it to you. jusun was admin. he removed himself from the admin position and became an advisor since he wasn't in the least bit active and didn't want to be involved in the big decision makers... ie. approving the by-laws.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 14 2006, 07:22 AM
Post
#14
|
|
 say maydayism. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,447 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 26,344 |
Can one of the higher-up mods contact Jusun and see if what is said above true?
It's quite dangerous to preassume this. |
|
|
|
| *mipadi* |
Aug 14 2006, 08:02 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(niez_cho @ Aug 14 2006, 8:22 AM) Can one of the higher-up mods contact Jusun and see if what is said above true? Hey, good luck with that. |
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Aug 14 2006, 08:52 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Spiritual Winged Aura @ Aug 14 2006, 1:42 AM) do you know what you're saying? yes. she is also right. shut up. and yea... good luck with contacting jusun. I say we bypass him. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 14 2006, 10:12 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 721 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 447,101 |
QUOTE(I Shot JFK @ Aug 12 2006, 2:13 PM) it is in NO WAY different. you just seem to be too dense to comprehend the other topic. buffoon.  QUOTE(I Shot JFK @ Aug 14 2006, 3:52 PM) yes. she is also right. shut up.
|
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Aug 14 2006, 11:23 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(niez_cho @ Aug 14 2006, 7:22 AM) Can one of the higher-up mods contact Jusun and see if what is said above true? It's quite dangerous to preassume this. What they said was true; for a long time, Jusun had been easing into more or less "handing over" CB to the present admins. He still has all the control and works behind the scenes, but he is not as active in the actual forums and therefore, does not have ultimate say in every decision. |
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 02:23 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Spiritual Winged Aura @ Aug 13 2006, 8:42 PM) do you know what you're saying? Yes. Dumbass. 
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 02:25 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Guest |
Let's not be mean...
|
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 02:33 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Guest |
Then let's have people not be stupid.
He really can't attempt to criticize me when he's illiterate. |
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:09 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Guest |
oh, but mean is SO much more honest than nice is...
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:15 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Guest |
Yes... I know - but bluntness is even better
|
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:34 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Guest |
But bluntness is rarely nice either. Amusing, but not nice by traditional standards.
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:35 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Guest |
^ Yes, but it's better than telling someone to shut up or caling them names - and it has deniability - you can say, "I was just staing the facts"
|
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:37 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Guest |
We'd already established that I was correct. To restate that would have been redundant. My lack of tactfulness does not make it much less true that he's a dumbass, either.
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:39 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Guest |
Yes, you were correct, but please don't call people names... please...? |
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:40 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Guest |
I will try to use discression so long as it's not just an undeniable truth :)
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:42 PM
Post
#29
|
|
Guest |
 Okay, thanks!
|
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:43 PM
Post
#30
|
|
Guest |
deniability is really only necessary if you wish to deny something.
and it is my BELIEF that he should shu tup. you cant stop me stating my BELIEFS. You cannot silence me! beliefist. |
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:44 PM
Post
#31
|
|
Guest |
James, I don't think I could even try...
|
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:46 PM
Post
#32
|
|
Guest |
Well you could try, you'd just assuredly fail
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:47 PM
Post
#33
|
|
Guest |
^ Exactly
I wouldn't even dream about it. |
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:49 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Guest |
Lol.
<3. Well, I dont pretend like i'll STOP, becaus ethat would be a complete lie. but i promise to feel REALLY bad about it. |
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:49 PM
Post
#35
|
|
Guest |
You don't enjoy arguing in circles for over an hour about absolutely nothing?
I'll consider stopping, but most likely won't feel bad about it in the least. It that worse? |
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:52 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(I Shot JFK @ Aug 31 2006, 4:49 PM) Lol. <3. Well, I dont pretend like i'll STOP, becaus ethat would be a complete lie. but i promise to feel REALLY bad about it. Thanks James  Anyway, BACK TO THE TOPIC |
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: