whats better?, ipod shuffle or ipod nano |
 Sep 25 2005, 04:32 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 rihanna is sexy chocolate<3.  Group: Member Posts: 165 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 191,782  |
i think ipod nano would be better because people were returning there ipod shuffle because it had so many problems i think thats way they made this.
|
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 14)
|
Sep 25 2005, 04:34 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 hi. call me linda. Group: Official Member Posts: 8,187 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,475 |
I think this belongs in Technology...
But eh, I would prefer the iPod Nano; it can hold more songs and looks better, IMO. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2005, 04:37 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 some reason i feel alone...guess cus my true self is never shown Group: Member Posts: 303 Joined: Sep 2005 Member No: 246,804 |
i say nano cause to me price doesnt matter and i think it hold more. i dont have any for music and things like that i use my psp
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2005, 04:38 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 What? Group: Member Posts: 709 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 92,823 |
Nano is better
more songs screen all the features of standard Ipod Plus more, Nano only features. |
|
|
|
| *suddenly she* |
Sep 25 2005, 04:39 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Guest |
what kind of question is this?
nano, duh. it holds more, it looks better, it's just.. what does anyone find in the shuffle that they like better than the nano? bafflement. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2005, 04:47 PM
Post
#6
|
|
 Member Group: Member Posts: 14 Joined: Sep 2005 Member No: 246,930 |
the nano. the shuffle's too.. shuffley.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2005, 04:54 PM
Post
#7
|
|
 Peggy. Group: Member Posts: 2,508 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 214,025 |
nano. at least there is a SCREEN.
move it to tech please. |
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Sep 25 2005, 04:54 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Guest |
Moved to Technology
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2005, 04:56 PM
Post
#9
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 650 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 84,519 |
Whiteout the screen... and voila. A Shuffle.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2005, 05:09 PM
Post
#10
|
|
 yeah. i'm kevin. Group: Member Posts: 1,399 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 38,782 |
Of course Nano.
Nano has more memory, color, and more features. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2005, 06:33 PM
Post
#11
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 1,665 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 127,076 |
The shuffle is way to small, and doesn't hold much songs.
The Nano on the other hand holds a good amount, enough to last your for years, but not too many years! >w< |
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2005, 07:11 PM
Post
#12
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,591 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 77,305 |
iPod Nano because Shuffle holds too little, but if shuffle came out in 20gb, I'd have it.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2005, 10:55 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
some reason i feel alone...guess cus my true self is never shown Group: Member Posts: 303 Joined: Sep 2005 Member No: 246,804 |
nano is a ipod version of the razor
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2005, 12:11 AM
Post
#14
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 70 Joined: Sep 2005 Member No: 246,385 |
I'm going to be the second person to choose the Shuffle here. No one has said anything about the considerable amount of extra money you have to pay to get the Nano. I have well over 1000 songs but I don't like all of them to listen to them all the time. Even with a 512 shuffle I still have trouble filling it up. Now it's mostly FF and Cowboy Bebop music.
In the end it's all up to taste. I don't need to know what song is "coming up" or is playing because I don't care. All the songs on my shuffle are songs I really like and I already know every one of them. 120 songs is about 6 hrs and that's plenty. I don't walk around everywhere listening to music. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2005, 10:38 PM
Post
#15
|
|
 banangst ♥ Group: Member Posts: 727 Joined: Sep 2005 Member No: 237,399 |
nano of course. shuffle has no screen. and i wouldnt know which song's coming up next.
but it's way small and thin.. you would have a small heart attack just while looking for it in your bag. |
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: