'auto eprops' script |
  |
| *krnxswat* |
 Feb 11 2004, 10:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest  |
People have been complaining ever since the auto eprops script came out. Should we take it down before the problem grows any bigger or should we wait and see what happens?
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2004, 10:44 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 I run this town.  Group: Member Posts: 582 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,867 |
i feel that it should be taken down.
|
|
|
|
| *eunie03* |
Feb 11 2004, 10:45 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
I'm very for taking it down. People didn't like auto subscribe. They're not gonna like this either. Except for the people who actually use it, of course, and they're not cool.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2004, 10:52 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 946 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 603 |
Yea, its exactually the same concept of the auto subscribe script, but I think its Worst cause your actually automatically giving like a eprop, which to some people is more precious than having people subscribe to u, lolz i dunno if that made sense really but i vote to have it taken down.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2004, 02:15 AM
Post
#5
|
|
 Perfectly Flawed Group: Member Posts: 1,913 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,652 |
I vote for taking it down. Very annoing code.
|
|
|
|
| *Podomaht* |
Feb 12 2004, 07:03 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Guest |
take it down man! take it down!
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2004, 10:20 AM
Post
#7
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 2,520 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 200 |
yeah.. seemsl ike alot of people dont like it.. im up for taking it down.. if u didnt already
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13 2004, 02:30 PM
Post
#8
|
|
 original member. Group: Official Member Posts: 4,825 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,460 |
Yea, I think the script should be taken down .
 It's defeating the purpose of eprops
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
Feb 13 2004, 04:09 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Guest |
geez, people will do anytihng for props.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: