Sexy Sig Movement Volume 2, o(-( |
![]() ![]() |
Sexy Sig Movement Volume 2, o(-( |
Jul 13 2008, 10:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Drank wit your boy ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,711 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 649,997 |
http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=205505
Continuation of where volume 1 left off. How is this not acceptable? Never once did I mention post porn in your sig. I just said put up a sexy avatar. Someone may put a pic of their fav celebrity fully clothed and consider that sexy. My topic should be reopened. ![]() |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 10:42 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 |
I'm going to agree that there was no reason to close it. That's like shutting down a club. Why not close down other clubs, like the Twilight Club, KPOP Club? This thread is PG-13, and doesn't break any rules..
|
|
|
|
| *cakedout* |
Jul 13 2008, 10:44 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
I SUPPORT THE MOVEMENT.
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 10:48 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 5,166 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 585,858 |
HAHAHAAH u ppll suu lamee..
SEXYY SIG... <<<< BAMMMM |
|
|
|
| *paperplane* |
Jul 13 2008, 10:49 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Guest |
Because the last thing we need is to encourage others to stick jiggling boobs in their signatures. While it does give a rough guideline of a 'PG-13' level of maturity in the Community Guidelines, the staff reserve the right to evaluate signatures and other images as to whether or not they are appropriate. I'm sure that it has been expressed to you that that this "sexy sig movement" goes beyond the limit of what has been deemed tasteful and appropriate.
I'm no advocate of censorship, but we all really shouldn't have to worry about how other people's avatars and signatures are going to appear in any sort of remotely public setting. It's different from the other clubs because the other clubs don't push the limits of any general societal standards. But for what it's worth, I think they're all stupid as f**k. |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 10:51 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 5,166 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 585,858 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 10:52 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 10:57 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Drank wit your boy ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,711 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 649,997 |
Because the last thing we need is to encourage others to stick juggling boobs in their signatures. While it does give a rough guideline of a 'PG-13' level of maturity in the Community Guidelines, the staff reserve the right to evaluate signatures and other images as to whether or not they are appropriate. I'm sure that it has been expressed to you that that this "sexy sig movement" goes beyond the limit of what has been deemed tasteful and appropriate. I'm not advocate of censorship, but we all really shouldn't have to worry about how other people's avatars and signatures are going to appear in any sort of remotely public setting. So wait let me get this straight, how is posting boobs in sigs inappropriate if their covered with a bikini? If thats the case BayWatch shouldn't have never aired on regular television. The particular part where the girl is grabbing her breast in my sig is from an audition tape of MTV's Real World. Millions of teenagers and adults watch that show. So what were getting at here is this is a children's site and we should have care bears in our sigs instead? |
|
|
|
| *cakedout* |
Jul 13 2008, 10:58 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Guest |
PREACH IT MY BROTHA
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 10:59 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Photoartist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
Zamunda has been unleashed.
Bow in the presence of greatness. |
|
|
|
| *paperplane* |
Jul 13 2008, 11:04 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Guest |
No, it has nothing to do with children. It has to do with it not being work appropriate. Or home appropriate, for those who have parents who concern themselves with what their kids are viewing online. Etc, etc. This may not be issues you have to concern yourself with, but that doesn't mean you should be able to alienate everyone else who uses this site. Yes, everyone could turn avs/sigs off, but why would they want to do that just because you like to see how much you can get away with?
And actually, I do post on a really active forum in which all avatars have to be of something either cute or delicious. Most all the posters are male, 18-25 (give or take). The rules are to prevent borderline and tasteless things such as giant boobs from being all over the site, so that people may post at work and whatnot. Also, boob appearances on shows are not the main point of shows. If we have 50 or 20 or however many people posting on here with "sexy sigs," that's excess. |
|
|
|
| *cakedout* |
Jul 13 2008, 11:05 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Guest |
boobs are hardly tasteless, i find them quite fun.
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 11:08 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Photoartist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
|
|
|
|
| *cakedout* |
Jul 13 2008, 11:09 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Guest |
ROFLMAO ZE DONG
|
|
|
|
| *paperplane* |
Jul 13 2008, 11:09 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Guest |
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 11:10 PM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Photoartist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
Wait what site, I'm curious now?
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 11:11 PM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 |
isohunt.com?
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 11:11 PM
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Pocketful of Sunshine ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,690 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 289,004 |
Let's hug! |
|
|
|
| *paperplane* |
Jul 13 2008, 11:11 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Guest |
waffles.fm
it's an OiNK reincarnation |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 11:12 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Photoartist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
ha ha dang invite only, oh well
|
|
|
|
| *cakedout* |
Jul 13 2008, 11:12 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Guest |
Tina i thought you were gonna change it
|
|
|
|
| *paperplane* |
Jul 13 2008, 11:12 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Guest |
yeah, that's why I use it
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 11:13 PM
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Photoartist ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,363 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 399,390 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 11:16 PM
Post
#24
|
|
![]() we jerkin' ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,408 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 210,730 |
i switched my sig =/ rip
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 11:17 PM
Post
#25
|
|
![]() ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 |
^ is she wearing the paris?
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |