same-sex marriages |
  |
 May 15 2008, 04:58 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,645 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,975  |
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 04:59 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 <joke> inside </joke> Group: Official Member Posts: 2,283 Joined: Oct 2006 Member No: 470,590 |
im totally for same sex marriage.
one state at a time |
|
|
|
| *paperplane* |
May 15 2008, 05:05 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
Aren't they just not illegal? What I got out of it was that they'd soon be legal, but aren't yet. Regardless though, great news!
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/05/15/same.sex....iage/index.html |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 05:27 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 The Resident Drunk Group: Head Staff Posts: 8,623 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,266 |
I don't have a problem with them at all. To each his own in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 05:27 PM
Post
#5
|
|
 Tick tock, Bill Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 |
Well it's about damn time. California is supposedly one of the most liberal states, so I was surprised that this was illegal for as long as it was.
Hahaha, I remember voting for Gary Coleman when Davis was ousted. lol (I know, throw away vote, but I wasn't supportive of the Governator, at least he (Coleman) got more votes than Gallagher hahaha). |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 05:34 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 1,450 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 98,407 |
birth rates will plummet.
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 05:35 PM
Post
#7
|
|
 Vae Victis Group: Official Member Posts: 1,419 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 460,227 |
All forms of marriage should be banned. If I had it my way, we would reproduce through chestbursters.
|
|
|
|
| *paperplane* |
May 15 2008, 05:40 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(sharpnotflat @ May 15 2008, 06:34 PM)  birth rates will plummet. ? |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 05:43 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Tick tock, Bill Group: Administrator Posts: 8,764 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 333,948 |
QUOTE(Reidar @ May 15 2008, 05:35 PM) All forms of marriage should be banned. If I had it my way, we would reproduce through chestbursters. Totally non related, but that reminded me of this: 
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 05:44 PM
Post
#10
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Head Staff Posts: 18,173 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 108,478 |
QUOTE(paperplane @ May 15 2008, 06:40 PM) ? Because same-sex couples can't reproduce naturally. |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 05:52 PM
Post
#11
|
|
 smells like teen spirit. Group: Member Posts: 130 Joined: Dec 2007 Member No: 601,458 |
woohooo. all for it.
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 05:53 PM
Post
#12
|
|
 DDR \\ I'm Dee :) Group: Mentor Posts: 8,662 Joined: Mar 2006 Member No: 384,020 |
I really don't foresee many other states following the trend.
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 06:30 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Vae Victis Group: Official Member Posts: 1,419 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 460,227 |
...there would be no difference in the birth rate unless the tendency for homosexuals was to engage in straight relationships while waiting for this ruling to pass.
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 06:35 PM
Post
#14
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 61 Joined: May 2008 Member No: 647,523 |
awww finally my gay besties can marry eachother
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 06:55 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Vae Victis Group: Official Member Posts: 1,419 Joined: Sep 2006 Member No: 460,227 |
QUOTE(superstitious @ May 15 2008, 05:43 PM) Totally non related, but that reminded me of this: http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/8823/ob...stbursteuo7.jpg Way to tarnish the sanctity of clean, wholesome violence. |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 07:00 PM
Post
#16
|
|
 isketchaholic Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,977 Joined: Apr 2007 Member No: 516,154 |
QUOTE(Synesthesia @ May 15 2008, 03:44 PM) Because same-sex couples can't reproduce naturally. I think she knew that LOL, she was just questioning the post itself. even when I read sean's post I was like...what. the. fuck. |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 07:10 PM
Post
#17
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Administrator Posts: 8,629 Joined: Jan 2007 Member No: 498,468 |
well i'm fine with same-sex marriages. i mean everyone should find love regardless of who it's with, right?
 i think everyone should be happy. i really don't have anything against this.you guys are probably like wtf considering i'm catholic & believe in same-sex marriage. lol. but i don't always agree with everything the church says. |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 08:11 PM
Post
#18
|
|
 The Illustrious Mari C. Group: Member Posts: 586 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 26,671 |
Honestly I don't really care, if that's the lifestyle you choose & wish to unionize then fine. Today's society is more open to anything nowadays. I just know it doesn't affect me in any kind of way so it's the least of my worries.
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 08:14 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 1,450 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 98,407 |
QUOTE(doiink @ May 15 2008, 05:00 PM) I think she knew that LOL, she was just questioning the post itself. even when I read sean's post I was like...what. the. fuck. what. the. fuck. |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 08:37 PM
Post
#20
|
|
 Cornflakes :D Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,541 Joined: Dec 2005 Member No: 322,923 |
Dude, stop making news related topics in the lounge
 Well thats nice, what are all the other states that allow this? I'm not for same sex marriages, but more power to them I guess. |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 09:05 PM
Post
#21
|
|
 Ms. Granger Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 735 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 165,238 |
Yayyyyyyyyyy
I still can't believe only 4 countries and (now) 2 states allow same-sex marriage. The thought that it's a bad idea doesn't even occur to me. |
|
|
|
|
May 15 2008, 09:33 PM
Post
#22
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001 |
Wow. It took so long to finally decide which is very surprising.
Now, we will have a flood of gay epidemic in our state where all the gaylords will rush to California to pursuit the best life at the best state where we have great beaches, food, and whether. It’s really interesting about the mind of Californian. We’re probably the most diverse state of the country considering the fact that we are located by the Pacific Ocean next to Mexico and receive Asians from Asia + more immigrants. We’re becoming more cultural accepting … and now we’re accepting gay. Wow, that’s just wow. I'm not against or for homosexual. It amazes me how we, as Americans, as Californian accept these extremely sensitive controversial issues about homosexuality that had been going on, on, on and on … for many centuries throughout the history. |
|
|
|
| *paperplane* |
May 16 2008, 12:05 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Synesthesia @ May 15 2008, 06:44 PM) Because same-sex couples can't reproduce naturally. Not what the question mark was for. |
|
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 12:39 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,645 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,975 |
QUOTE(sharpnotflat @ May 15 2008, 03:34 PM) birth rates will plummet. Wtf Sean? QUOTE(doublehelix @ May 15 2008, 04:48 PM) Yeah, the article did say that it wasn't going to be passed for another 30 days. Yeah 30 days and then it'll be for sure intil those crazy people get something on November's ballot to try and overturn it. I hear Ellen is getting married! This is a wonderful day. We'll look back on this one day like we look back on segregation and anti-miscegenation laws. |
|
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 12:42 AM
Post
#25
|
|
 ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 14,309 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: