Log In · Register

 
6 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
bye bye steven, giraffe, podomaht
micron
post Apr 4 2008, 07:58 PM
Post #1


cb's #1 fan! =)
******

Group: Advisor
Posts: 2,342
Joined: Nov 2003
Member No: 1



what you guys did was completely unacceptable, disgusting, and vile. banning doesn't do enough justice. i say good riddance; good bye, you guys have no place in these forums.




edit;
for those who are wondering about the banning - ive banned these three for violating a member's privacy... and that's an incredibly great understatement. what these three did was find private photos of said member and decided to prey upon said member by posting said photos repeatedly on these forums.

thats all im going to say but believe me, what they did was completely unacceptable and banning does not do enough justice.



edit2;
EVERYONE WHO ARE TRYING TO DEFEND THE BANNED MEMBERS: HAD YOU BEEN THE VICTIM, HOW WOULD YOU FEEL? DON'T BE SO STUPID TO THINK THAT SOMETHING LIKE THIS CAN EVER BE TOLERATED.
 
ReggieM
post Apr 4 2008, 07:59 PM
Post #2


we jerkin'
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,408
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 210,730



/gg
 
ReggieM
post Apr 4 2008, 07:59 PM
Post #3


we jerkin'
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,408
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 210,730



although i will be sad(no homo) to see steven go.
 
Just_Dream
post Apr 4 2008, 08:03 PM
Post #4


durian
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,124
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,860



I don't know about podo (assuming we're talking about monster), but anyway, is this about that whole nudez thing? Ouch.
 
Elba
post Apr 4 2008, 08:04 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,645
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,975



Why were they banned?
 
iDecay
post Apr 4 2008, 08:04 PM
Post #6


Pocketful of Sunshine
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,690
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 289,004



Podo was in on this? Whaaat?

[ass-kissing]
ILY, Sandy! YOU TWO STEVEN!

[/ass-kissing]
 
Elba
post Apr 4 2008, 08:05 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,645
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,975



In on what?
 
pandora
post Apr 4 2008, 08:06 PM
Post #8


i did your boyfriend
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,335
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,071



the fake podomaht.
 
Just_Dream
post Apr 4 2008, 08:06 PM
Post #9


durian
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,124
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,860



QUOTE(Elba @ Apr 4 2008, 06:05 PM) *
In on what?

You know wut.
 
Elba
post Apr 4 2008, 08:07 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,645
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,975



Now I know what.
 
moninja
post Apr 4 2008, 08:07 PM
Post #11


R U A Q T ? [;
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 7,276
Joined: Jun 2006
Member No: 421,631



don't get rid of steven and sandy -_-
 
Elba
post Apr 4 2008, 08:08 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,645
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,975



QUOTE(moninja @ Apr 4 2008, 06:07 PM) *
don't get rid of steven and sandy -_-

 
micron
post Apr 4 2008, 08:08 PM
Post #13


cb's #1 fan! =)
******

Group: Advisor
Posts: 2,342
Joined: Nov 2003
Member No: 1



for those who are wondering about the banning - ive banned these three for violating a member's privacy... and that's an incredibly great understatement. what these three did was find private photos of said member and decided to prey upon said member by posting said photos repeatedly on these forums.

thats all im going to say but believe me, what they did was completely unacceptable and banning does not do enough justice.
 
Just_Dream
post Apr 4 2008, 08:10 PM
Post #14


durian
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,124
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,860



Hypothetically speaking, what if a particular person said that s/he did not care that certain particular photos were shown? Hypothetically speaking.
 
Elba
post Apr 4 2008, 08:11 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 3,645
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,975



What if said pictures were not private to begin with, rather they were accessible by anyone?
 
The-March-Hare
post Apr 4 2008, 08:13 PM
Post #16


James killed the radio star.
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 2,095
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 589,855



Hypothetically, if these photos were freely available online, and made so by the member in question, how is this situation different from any other of the numerous times many people have poste porn pics on cB.

I have every sympathy with Trish being upset about this, and you being angry, but honestly, I don't see how this is justifiable in the sense of being you know... justice.
 
shoryuken
post Apr 4 2008, 08:13 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 5,166
Joined: Oct 2007
Member No: 585,858



BUWHAHAHA...

OWN!!! tongue.gif
 
micron
post Apr 4 2008, 08:14 PM
Post #18


cb's #1 fan! =)
******

Group: Advisor
Posts: 2,342
Joined: Nov 2003
Member No: 1



QUOTE(Just_Dream @ Apr 4 2008, 09:10 PM) *
Hypothetically speaking, what if a particular person said that s/he did not care that certain particular photos were shown? Hypothetically speaking.


doesnt change a thing. these photos should have never been posted by ANYONE but by the owner, if that was to be the case.


QUOTE(Elba @ Apr 4 2008, 09:11 PM) *
What if said pictures were not private to begin with, rather they were accessible by anyone?


again, ONLY and ONLY the owner had the right to share them, had he/she wanted to.
 
The-March-Hare
post Apr 4 2008, 08:15 PM
Post #19


James killed the radio star.
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 2,095
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 589,855



Again, if the photo is freely available online, why are these pictures different from any others? By that logic, anyone should be banned for taking a picture not actually taken by them anywhere on cB.
 
HoodNigga
post Apr 4 2008, 08:15 PM
Post #20


Yup thats my girlfriend.
*****

Group: Banned
Posts: 665
Joined: Mar 2007
Member No: 513,693



QUOTE(The-March-Hare @ Apr 4 2008, 09:13 PM) *
Hypothetically, if these photos were freely available online, and made so by the member in question, how is this situation different from any other of the numerous times many people have poste porn pics on cB.

Word


I posted porn before, can you bannish me also? I want you to murk my CB Account too.
 
pandora
post Apr 4 2008, 08:16 PM
Post #21


i did your boyfriend
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,335
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,071



Elba & James: They were residing on my private server, so no they were not publicly accessible by anyone. They were accessible because I forgot to turn public indexing off that particular directory and they took it upon themselves to snoop around in there.

Christina: I said I wasn't shy about the pics but I didn't want them to be blasted all over the forum. If you want to send people the pics over AIM that's fine, although I rather you wouldn't because that is seriously messed up, but don't post them on a public venue for anyone and everyone to see.
 
micron
post Apr 4 2008, 08:18 PM
Post #22


cb's #1 fan! =)
******

Group: Advisor
Posts: 2,342
Joined: Nov 2003
Member No: 1



QUOTE(The-March-Hare @ Apr 4 2008, 09:13 PM) *
Hypothetically, if these photos were freely available online, and made so by the member in question, how is this situation different from any other of the numerous times many people have poste porn pics on cB.

I have every sympathy with Trish being upset about this, and you being angry, but honestly, I don't see how this is justifiable in the sense of being you know... justice.


they were not intentionally available to the public. and once again, ONLY the owner has the right to post these photos publicly.
 
micron
post Apr 4 2008, 08:19 PM
Post #23


cb's #1 fan! =)
******

Group: Advisor
Posts: 2,342
Joined: Nov 2003
Member No: 1



EVERYONE WHO ARE TRYING TO DEFEND THE BANNED MEMBERS: HAD YOU BEEN THE VICTIM, HOW WOULD YOU FEEL? DON'T BE SO STUPID TO THINK THAT SOMETHING LIKE THIS CAN EVER BE TOLERATED.
 
ReggieM
post Apr 4 2008, 08:19 PM
Post #24


we jerkin'
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,408
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 210,730



take it to pms.SIKE please dont.
 
shoryuken
post Apr 4 2008, 08:20 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 5,166
Joined: Oct 2007
Member No: 585,858



me aintt takinn sidee hur buutt pandoraa rite...

y u gitta go n putt hurr nakeddd pixx alll ovaa da forumm..? blink.gif mellow.gif
QUOTE(pandora @ Apr 4 2008, 09:16 PM) *
Elba & James: They were residing on my private server, so no they were not publicly accessible by anyone. They were accessible because I forgot to turn public indexing off that particular directory and they took it upon themselves to snoop around in there.

Christina: I said I wasn't shy about the pics but I didn't want them to be blasted all over the forum. If you want to send people the pics over AIM that's fine, although I rather you wouldn't because that is seriously messed up, but don't post them on a public venue for anyone and everyone to see.

whoo hur ginnaaa senndd mee da pix plz...? shifty.gif thumbsup.gif wink.gif
 

6 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: