Log In · Register

 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Question!
lovefooled
post Oct 4 2007, 11:13 PM
Post #1


Is it summer yet?
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 817
Joined: Nov 2006
Member No: 477,032



IDK if I should buy these (they're $120 plus S&H):

Yay or nay?
 
Tung
post Oct 4 2007, 11:24 PM
Post #2


٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 14,309
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 65,593



ugly.
 
*Steven*
post Oct 4 2007, 11:25 PM
Post #3





Guest






Are those some of those Ugg boots? Coming from a guy, I think 120$ on a pair of shoes you'll probly hardly wear (based on what I've observed of girls and shoes) is impractical. I'd save your money :)

Besides, they don't even look that good :) They look like hiking boots, not nice shoes.


edit: Tung said what I wanted to say in one word, kudos.
 
annalucky
post Oct 4 2007, 11:32 PM
Post #4


Lurker.
******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 2,161
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,851



I think they're ugly. But then again, I'm not a big fan of uggs.


and I wouldn't pay $120 for that.
 
Gigi
post Oct 4 2007, 11:34 PM
Post #5


in a matter of time
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,151
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 191,357



I don't like them...but some people do look cute in them. I just prefer a sleek, simple boot as opposed to one with laces and fur peeking out from underneath.
 
babecakes
post Oct 5 2007, 12:40 AM
Post #6


!~@*&+;$
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,033
Joined: Oct 2007
Member No: 579,371



i wouldn't wear them but then again i prefer my boots somewhat simple, slouchy and black, grey or white. it's just so much easier to match then something with tons of lace and fur. i guess it depends on your style and what you are planning to wear with it, your choice.
+http://www.revolveclothing.com/DisplayProd...s=C&d=Shoes
 
cyb3r0ptik
post Oct 5 2007, 11:53 AM
Post #7


:electro[u]nique:
****

Group: Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Aug 2007
Member No: 561,877



i think they're ugly.
and too expensive.

they don't look that well put together for $120.

 
nosylilme
post Oct 5 2007, 11:59 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 299
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 457,013



I wouldn't pay $120 for a pair of boots..or any other one piece of clothing/shoes for the matter.
 
jammylise
post Oct 5 2007, 12:08 PM
Post #9


I am not afraid, I was born for this.
*****

Group: Official Member
Posts: 805
Joined: Aug 2007
Member No: 565,063



Ew, they shot.
 
LOWinSKANK
post Oct 5 2007, 12:34 PM
Post #10


[BRITT;;]
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 764
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 433,210



no offense, but ew. ;/
 
*stephinika*
post Oct 5 2007, 03:08 PM
Post #11





Guest






Eh. Not my style. I'd pay $200 for boots, but not those boots to be perfectly honest. You could probably find some that are nicer.
 
hollywoodpink
post Oct 5 2007, 07:58 PM
Post #12


courtneeeey :)
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 420
Joined: Mar 2006
Member No: 386,316



Deff nay. Normal Uggs look better, and they're similar. You should get those instead. The one's with the paisley print are pretty cool. Aaaand they're pretty much the same price.
 
madgamer
post Oct 5 2007, 11:39 PM
Post #13


<3
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 455
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 445,104



You can find better looking boots that cost a lot cheaper. I won't spend $120 on that.
 
jesusisthebestth...
post Oct 6 2007, 12:14 AM
Post #14


well, if practice makes perfect then im relaxin at rehearsal
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 329
Joined: May 2007
Member No: 529,475



nay
because u can find a similar pair
for a whole lot less sum where else.
 
*Michelle*
post Oct 6 2007, 11:21 AM
Post #15





Guest






sick.gif
 
ChadDevil
post Oct 7 2007, 09:58 PM
Post #16


eat your heart out !
****

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 193
Joined: May 2007
Member No: 526,306



i hate them and if its real fur then heck no
 
Becks539
post Oct 8 2007, 09:28 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Jun 2007
Member No: 537,000



ew. they remind me of mountain climbing boots...
 
brooklyneast05
post Oct 8 2007, 09:34 PM
Post #18


I'm Jc
********

Group: Mentor
Posts: 13,619
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 437,556



besides looking like shit
they look really cheap too
i don't get why anyone would want this shit, unless they were trapping wild game in snowy mountains
 
revka
post Oct 8 2007, 09:37 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Sep 2007
Member No: 575,648



QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Oct 8 2007, 10:34 PM) *
besides looking like shit
they look really cheap too
i don't get why anyone would want this shit, unless they were trapping wild game in snowy mountains


ditto
 
misoshiru
post Oct 9 2007, 02:06 AM
Post #20


yan lin♥
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 14,129
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 13,627



nay. want good winter boots, get uggs.
 
megnast
post Oct 9 2007, 03:46 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 59
Joined: Oct 2007
Member No: 580,537



eeeeeek. i don't like them, personally. i think your money would be better spent on a nice pair of black/brown knee-high boots that can be dressed up or down with anything. they can also be worn in the spring and winter, so you get your moneys worth.
 
lovefooled
post Oct 15 2007, 07:33 PM
Post #22


Is it summer yet?
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 817
Joined: Nov 2006
Member No: 477,032



QUOTE(misoshiru @ Oct 9 2007, 03:06 AM) *
nay. want good winter boots, get uggs.

Those are Uggs. LOL.

I guess I'll go with the regular Uggs. But...

Short?

Or tall?
 
TheReasonWhy
post Oct 15 2007, 11:14 PM
Post #23


bliss.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 735
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 41,566



yeah regular uggs are better looking
go with the short ones
 
Jinny
post Oct 18 2007, 06:40 PM
Post #24


long time no CB.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 3,889
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 493,502



QUOTE(lovefooled @ Oct 15 2007, 07:33 PM) *
Those are Uggs. LOL.

I guess I'll go with the regular Uggs. But...

Short?
http://www.zappos.com/images/722/7222040/985-25271-p.jpg
Or tall?
http://www.zappos.com/images/736/7362085/7954-508539-p.jpg


I like the short ones better. Stick to them thumbsup.gif
and I have the ones that you asked about in your first post
 
arcanum
post Oct 18 2007, 06:44 PM
Post #25


:)
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 1,636
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 34,459



Definitely not, those are not worth it. They are ugly.
And as far as the uggs, I'd go with short.
 
misoshiru
post Oct 19 2007, 03:59 AM
Post #26


yan lin♥
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 14,129
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 13,627



QUOTE(lovefooled @ Oct 16 2007, 08:33 AM) *
Those are Uggs. LOL.

I guess I'll go with the regular Uggs. But...

Short?

Or tall?

srsly? then they're hella ugly uggs. get long ones. they're warmer.
 
kayla0790x
post Oct 29 2007, 11:40 AM
Post #27


Its Kayla Baby!
***

Group: Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Jun 2007
Member No: 533,067



Short original ugg boots look good with boyfriend jeans and an oversized hoody :)
I dont like the ones posted in the first post, they're ugly.
 
ersatz
post Oct 29 2007, 03:44 PM
Post #28


Ms. Granger
*****

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 735
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 165,238



Where do you people get all this money...
 
SLACK3R
post Nov 1 2007, 05:07 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Oct 2007
Member No: 585,251



Ew. Just go with short uggs. They're hella comfy :D
 

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: