moderator for a day |
  |
| *AngelicEyz00* |
 May 22 2007, 11:22 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest  |
|
|
|
|
| *kryogenix* |
May 22 2007, 11:26 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
If drafted, I will not run; if nominated, I will not accept; if elected, I will not serve.
|
|
|
|
| *The Markster* |
May 22 2007, 11:27 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
Seems fun and tempting, but I don't think the mods will like it.
|
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 22 2007, 11:28 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
Why wouldn't they like it? Unless they're Nazis. Which only the Hitler wannabe is.
|
|
|
|
| *The Markster* |
May 22 2007, 11:30 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(AngelicEyz00 @ May 22 2007, 09:28 PM)  Why wouldn't they like it? Unless they're Nazis. Which only the Hitler wannabe is. Oh wait, you mean someone will be elected to be a moderator for a certain day? |
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 22 2007, 11:31 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Guest |
Yessir.
// Well, not really elected, per se. Some sort of a contest where the winners get to be mods for a day... or whatever. |
|
|
|
| *StanleyThePanda* |
May 22 2007, 11:36 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(The Markster @ May 23 2007, 12:27 AM) Seems fun and tempting, but I don't think the mods will like it. Why do you think that?  Sounds like a very interesting idea, Elba.  I like it. teehee. |
|
|
|
| *digitalfragrance* |
May 22 2007, 11:38 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Guest |
What kind of contest? Because we couldn't just have ANYBODY be a mod for the day... imagine the chaos... *shudder*
I'm for it, as long as the contest winner would be somewhat qualified... as in the contest proves it, or something. It's late and I'm rambling, so I'm done. |
|
|
|
| *JoanOfArc* |
May 22 2007, 11:40 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Guest |
Oh man, we would not see the end of that. That sure seems interesting though...hm. We need some guidelines on who can enter though.
|
|
|
|
| *The Markster* |
May 22 2007, 11:41 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Guest |
I'm for it, then, too! Wow, how fun!
|
|
|
|
| *[2]Nekked* |
May 22 2007, 11:44 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Guest |
kinda funny. elba and i were both a part of the original staff. and kryo too.
|
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 22 2007, 11:46 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Guest |
Aw, you guys are already wanting to limit who gets to be mod
|
|
|
|
|
May 22 2007, 11:46 PM
Post
#13
|
|
 say maydayism.  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,447 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 26,344 |
I would like to see more guidelines set on this thing before I know whether I'm for or against the idea.
|
|
|
|
| *digitalfragrance* |
May 22 2007, 11:49 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(AngelicEyz00 @ May 23 2007, 12:46 AM) Aw, you guys are already wanting to limit who gets to be mod Well, we can't just have anybody... what if someone went through and rejected all of the graphics? Or closed and deleted topics that shouldn't be? I mean, there has to be some sort of common sense in who can and can't be a mod for the day. |
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 22 2007, 11:50 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(digitalfragrance @ May 22 2007, 09:49 PM) Well, we can't just have anybody... what if someone went through and rejected all of the graphics? Or closed and deleted topics that shouldn't be? I mean, there has to be some sort of common sense in who can and can't be a mod for the day. Well if they get power hungry, then the admins can just demote them. |
|
|
|
| *StanleyThePanda* |
May 22 2007, 11:54 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Guest |
^ thats true.
And if they make a mess, it shouldnt be too hard to clean up. But maybe some guidelines should be set. I mean... All contests have some sort of guidelines, ya know? |
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 22 2007, 11:55 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Guest |
Yes, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
May 22 2007, 11:56 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
say maydayism. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,447 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 26,344 |
^ what if there's no admin on at that time?
You can MAKE A HUGE MESS if the limit is one whole day, you know. |
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 23 2007, 12:00 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Guest |
As long as they're not allowed to delete anything, I don't think that such a big mess can be made.
How about if you f**k up, you get suspended for 30 days, haha. That should give them a reason not to make a big mess, eh? |
|
|
|
|
May 23 2007, 12:17 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
say maydayism. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,447 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 26,344 |
^ that's a good punishment I think.
|
|
|
|
| *The Markster* |
May 23 2007, 12:40 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(AngelicEyz00 @ May 22 2007, 10:00 PM) As long as they're not allowed to delete anything, I don't think that such a big mess can be made. How about if you f**k up, you get suspended for 30 days, haha. That should give them a reason not to make a big mess, eh? Good punishment, but you'll never know. Someone could at least take advantage, spite the 30-day consequence, and just majorly misuse their powers and ban whoever they see. |
|
|
|
| *[2]Nekked* |
May 23 2007, 12:56 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Guest |
an admin can create a new staff group with very limited access to mod functionality. i.e. no banning/suspending/warning. you should only get to moderate topics (open/close/move) and view backstage crap.
|
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 23 2007, 01:52 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Guest |
Now that it seems like it's going to be so limited, it doesn't seem that fun anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
May 23 2007, 01:59 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
say maydayism. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,447 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 26,344 |
^ but we just have to set up those restrictions in case someone really goes overboard with the mod powers... even it's just a day.
|
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
May 23 2007, 02:01 AM
Post
#25
|
|
Guest |
Or we could just trust that they wont. Meh, I dunno.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: