spiritual winged aura, active? |
![]() ![]() |
spiritual winged aura, active? |
Nov 21 2005, 02:02 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
yes. you. post again in the bylaws?
well, if not, i put forth the motion that we uncommittieeate him and put linda (retrogressive) in his place. |
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Nov 21 2005, 02:05 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
Is there really all that much more to vote on anyway?
|
|
|
|
Nov 21 2005, 02:06 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
but if he's not active then he's taking up a comittee member slot of someone who would be active.
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Nov 21 2005, 10:45 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
why do you automatically pick linda? she hasnt been involved in a lot of stuff in bylaws and anna has shown interest in the last spot that rachel took and plus, i side with sammi. theres not much more to talk about. most of the stuff weve already covered hence most of the closed topics.
|
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Nov 21 2005, 10:49 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Guest |
Yes, priority goes to members that have already expressed interest first not just someone you would like to see in someone elses place. You could have pm'd him instead of making a topic. As a matter of fact, I'll do it.
Edit:// I just pm'd about his activeness and whether or not he wants to resign. I will update you, the committee, once he responds to my pm. I will close this until then. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |