Voting |
  |
 Oct 23 2005, 05:13 AM
Post
#1
|
|
 Another ditch in the road... you keep moving  Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152  |
ok... when we are taking a vote on an issue, all committee members vote 'aye' or 'nay' or abstain
which begs the question, do we think that we need a majority for an issue to be passed, or merely the highest numer of ayes or nays. i'm, inclined to say that we need a majority, but that means it will be difficult to make decisions if we allow abstentions... |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 05:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 creepy heather Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 |
 well the way we do it backstage is 60% of the mods have to agree when making changes. i think itd be good to make it like that |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 05:46 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
ok, that means that at least 6 out of ten have to agree for a motion to be passed or rejected.
but that means that if even one person abstains, the vote cant go anywhere |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 06:00 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
creepy heather Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 |
i dont think any should abstain :\ one or the other. we only have 10 people so everyone should think real hard about it and choose one or the other!
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 23 2005, 02:32 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Guest |
yeah, before i read heathers post i thought it should at least be 6/10.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 02:40 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
then that means that really, forthe sake of being able to make decisions, we will not have abstentions.
which actually, makes sense. people joined this committee because they care about CB, and hence should be willing to decide one way or the other for an issue any major objections to that? |
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Oct 23 2005, 02:45 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Guest |
Nope. I like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 02:48 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
ok... hrrm. we have one topic (the one about post count limit on potential staff, im pretty sure) where someone has absstained already... kiera i think
should we discard that? |
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Oct 23 2005, 03:54 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Guest |
No.
Kiera, vote! |
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 23 2005, 03:55 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Guest |
james, you have a good point about not voting. they are on the committee for a reason.
|
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Oct 23 2005, 03:57 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Guest |
^ Well James came up with it in the first place when he suggest that sammi abstain her vote, oh well doesnt matter, I do think we all should vote......
 I suppose, I'll get to my in vote later........6/10 to pass a vote right........
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 23 2005, 04:01 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Guest |
^
yeah, but since theres an even number of us, one person not voting can make it hard to pass. and yes, its 6/10 vote. |
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Oct 23 2005, 04:10 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Guest |
^yup.
What is there is a 5/5 vote? hrmmmmmm......we have no plan of action for that now do we? |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 04:36 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
we discard the ballot and resume debate, revoting after two days
|
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Oct 23 2005, 05:43 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Guest |
Haven't se been doing 6/10 already? Did we really need a topic for this?
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 23 2005, 05:44 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Guest |
^
yeah, it was stated there was a 6/10 vote. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 05:44 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
yes, we have, but that was before we had abstentions, which make it MUCH harder to get a majority on anything remotely controversial
so, if we are going o stick with 6/10 voting, we ough tto scrap abstentions |
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 23 2005, 05:45 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Guest |
now that everything is figured out
TOPIC CLOSED |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: