Log In · Register

 
 
Closed TopicStart new topic
Layout Minimum Requirements
mind_of_its_own
post Sep 11 2005, 10:57 PM
Post #1


Laugh til' it hurts
****

Group: Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 199,709



I have submitted many layouts. And many of them get rejected. I understand that rejection is a natural part of learning, but I can't really learn if all I get in the rejection notice is, "It does not meet the minimum standards". I think it would be better if you had a topic that described what you're looking for in a submitted layout. That way anybody that wants to submit a layout can look at it and see what you're looking for, and you don't have to personally tell each member what you didn't like if they get rejected. Just a thought, and now I'm done. happy.gif
 
talcumpowder
post Sep 11 2005, 11:03 PM
Post #2


You'll find me in your dreams.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,536
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 114,010



I hate to tell you this, but we do. mellow.gif
[ http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=77054 ]
Besides, if you surf around in the skins section... You'll begin to see a minimum standard. Along with that, each mod has their own quality standards and such, so... Yeah.
 
whomps
post Sep 11 2005, 11:48 PM
Post #3


:hammer:
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 9,849
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,700



Like Reiri said, each mod has their own standard.

What do some of your skins look like ?
 
mind_of_its_own
post Sep 12 2005, 08:32 PM
Post #4


Laugh til' it hurts
****

Group: Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 199,709



The link that nyah-chan sent goes to how to submit a layout. I already know how to do that. I mean requirements, like
1) no this
2) no that

^like that.
 
gelionie
post Sep 13 2005, 06:42 AM
Post #5


say maydayism.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,447
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 26,344



^
QUOTE
Along with that, each mod has their own quality standards and such, so... Yeah.


See some of the already accepted layouts and you'll know the general standard.
 
xquizit
post Sep 13 2005, 02:40 PM
Post #6


wanderlust personified.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 7,515
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 797



The mods and I have been working on a list to explain our minimum stardards of skin approval. When I find time, I will post these for viwing but for now...


Good
clean and uncluttered design
readable text
pleasant and suitable color scheme
clear theme
originality
reasonable loading time
balance between graphics and text
easy navigation
consistency

Bad
poor organization
overuse of scripts
poor quality images
jocked images
misaligned elements
inappropriate/offensive theme
broken images
tacky text or image effects
too bright or busy background image
double scrollbars
mulitple fonts, sizes, and colors
 
demolished
post Sep 14 2005, 10:05 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



QUOTE(xquizit @ Sep 13 2005, 11:40 AM)
The mods and I have been working on a list to explain our minimum stardards of skin approval. When I find time, I will post these for viwing but for now...
Good
clean and uncluttered design
readable text
pleasant and suitable color scheme
clear theme
originality
reasonable loading time
balance between graphics and text
easy navigation
consistency

Bad
poor organization
overuse of scripts
poor quality images
jocked images
misaligned elements
inappropriate/offensive theme
broken images
tacky text or image effects
too bright or busy background image
double scrollbars
mulitple fonts, sizes, and colors
*


Whats wrong with multiple font ? I like to add a new font when hovering.
 
talcumpowder
post Sep 14 2005, 10:12 PM
Post #8


You'll find me in your dreams.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,536
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 114,010



Having multiple fonts is kinda distracting. It's okay if it jut the hover or heading font, but if every link is a different size/color/font, it really doesn't help much. And besides, you can't read anything.
 

Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: