Log In · Register

 
5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
inception
Blyat
post Aug 8 2010, 09:09 PM
Post #76


Senior Member
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,938
Joined: Jul 2008
Member No: 667,832



QUOTE(serotonin @ Aug 8 2010, 10:05 PM) *
It was reality. I don't see how so many people are confused by this. There were five levels of dreaming. There were rules as to why everything happened. The very end was not in fact a dream, it was wobbling at the end. In the dream it maintained a perfect spin once it got going, never wobbling at all. Maybe Grandma was cooking a pie? In the dream she was always there to call them away, this was atypical from that.

yeahhh thats what I said in a shorter version
I'm glad I'm not the only one ^^
 
none345678
post Aug 8 2010, 09:41 PM
Post #77


Sex, Blood, & RocknRoll
*******

Group: People Staff
Posts: 5,305
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 596,480



QUOTE(serotonin @ Aug 8 2010, 09:05 PM) *
It was reality. I don't see how so many people are confused by this. There were five levels of dreaming. There were rules as to why everything happened. The very end was not in fact a dream, it was wobbling at the end. In the dream it maintained a perfect spin once it got going, never wobbling at all. Maybe Grandma was cooking a pie? In the dream she was always there to call them away, this was atypical from that.


Well a lot of people say the top wasn't effective because both mol and the Asian dude touched it (I personally don't think it matters since mol was dead and the Asian dude was dreaming when he touched it) and the grandma thing is just pointless to bring up. I am with you. He was awake.

Either way:
 
datass
post Aug 9 2010, 12:27 AM
Post #78


(′ ・ω・`)
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,179
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 72,477



^lol what's up w/ the photo of jgl?
 
*futura*
post Aug 9 2010, 01:58 AM
Post #79





Guest






QUOTE(serotonin @ Aug 8 2010, 07:05 PM) *
It was reality. I don't see how so many people are confused by this. There were five levels of dreaming. There were rules as to why everything happened. The very end was not in fact a dream, it was wobbling at the end. In the dream it maintained a perfect spin once it got going, never wobbling at all. Maybe Grandma was cooking a pie? In the dream she was always there to call them away, this was atypical from that.

This was my pov in the beginning.

But then
QUOTE(gojira @ Jul 31 2010, 12:23 PM) *
i swear after hearing every pov, it started to obscure my original interpretation. they feed you their take, then the plot holes that supposedly supports their ending.


And now I'm like idk bro
 
iRapediCarly
post Aug 9 2010, 03:12 PM
Post #80


Senior Member
*****

Group: Official Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Sep 2009
Member No: 745,302



i thought the totem was just an inception performed on the wife, right?
 
itskamanstar
post Aug 9 2010, 05:35 PM
Post #81


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 633,509



I saw the movie a few weeks ago. I love it. It's such a good movie.

I personally believe that the end was not a dream, although I've heard convincing evidence that it was.

You guys have listed almost all of the evidence, one other detail somebody pointed out to me was that at the end what Cobbs left the airport, all the people turned and stared at him as if he was an outside force in somebody else's dream.


I'd rather them not make a sequel, but if one is made it could be the team (minus Cobbs) having to traverse the limbo landscape and get Cobbs out. Or maybe if the ending was real, Cobbs gets called in for another job. And knowing Hollywood it would probably have to leave room for a third one... but whatever. DiCaprio doesn't do sequels anyway. When somebody asked him if there would be a sequel, he said the ending is really something that shouldn't be touched upon again, that it should be left alone, that he was invested in that ending. I can't imagine him wanting to do another one, unless the script is really, really good.
 
sixfive
post Aug 9 2010, 05:52 PM
Post #82



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,020
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



QUOTE
You guys have listed almost all of the evidence, one other detail somebody pointed out to me was that at the end what Cobbs left the airport, all the people turned and stared at him as if he was an outside force in somebody else's dream.


They don't stare at outside forces, only if he changes things. He wasn't changing things.
 
Joanne
post Aug 9 2010, 05:59 PM
Post #83



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,155
Joined: Feb 2005
Member No: 95,404



Wasn't it just the Fische and the members of Cobb's team that were staring at him?
 
none345678
post Aug 9 2010, 06:37 PM
Post #84


Sex, Blood, & RocknRoll
*******

Group: People Staff
Posts: 5,305
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 596,480



^that's what I remember so I don't get why [people keep saying that everyone was staring.
 
itskamanstar
post Aug 9 2010, 07:10 PM
Post #85


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 633,509



QUOTE(serotonin @ Aug 9 2010, 07:52 PM) *
They don't stare at outside forces, only if he changes things. He wasn't changing things.


I'm not saying he was changing things, I think it's real. That's just something I heard (and I guess it's not true).
 
iRapediCarly
post Aug 9 2010, 09:59 PM
Post #86


Senior Member
*****

Group: Official Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Sep 2009
Member No: 745,302



^more like you werent thinking at all and just absorbed information from your friend
 
itskamanstar
post Aug 9 2010, 10:09 PM
Post #87


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 633,509



QUOTE(aflyingcumshot @ Aug 9 2010, 10:59 PM) *
^more like you werent thinking at all and just absorbed information from your friend


When I heard it I honestly couldn't remember if they stared at him. I was just sharing. There's no need to be like that.
 
iRapediCarly
post Aug 9 2010, 10:19 PM
Post #88


Senior Member
*****

Group: Official Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Sep 2009
Member No: 745,302



then share your own unique idea, mooching off someone else's opinion doesn't make you smarter
 
itskamanstar
post Aug 9 2010, 10:35 PM
Post #89


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 633,509



QUOTE(aflyingcumshot @ Aug 9 2010, 11:19 PM) *
then share your own unique idea, mooching off someone else's opinion doesn't make you smarter


I wasn't "mooching off" someone else's idea. I said someone pointed it out to me. Just because I mention something that might contribute to the discussion of this thread doesn't mean I'm trying to appear smart.

Actually I want to ask the thread something; the movie didn't explain where Cobbs originally got the dreaming device, right? Was it explained in the prequel comic? I mean the device isn't available to the public. It wasn't explained. Does anybody have an answer?
 
none345678
post Aug 9 2010, 10:45 PM
Post #90


Sex, Blood, & RocknRoll
*******

Group: People Staff
Posts: 5,305
Joined: Nov 2007
Member No: 596,480



QUOTE(BlueHeroBH @ Aug 9 2010, 10:35 PM) *
I wasn't "mooching off" someone else's idea. I said someone pointed it out to me. Just because I mention something that might contribute to the discussion of this thread doesn't mean I'm trying to appear smart.

Actually I want to ask the thread something; the movie didn't explain where Cobbs originally got the dreaming device, right? Was it explained in the prequel comic? I mean the device isn't available to the public. It wasn't explained. Does anybody have an answer?


Didn't he work for a sort of "company" type thing I just figured he got if from there. Forgetting so many details to the movie though.
 
sixfive
post Aug 10 2010, 12:43 AM
Post #91



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,020
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



he was free lance he worked for whoever hired him
 
Joanne
post Aug 10 2010, 01:38 AM
Post #92



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,155
Joined: Feb 2005
Member No: 95,404



QUOTE(BlueHeroBH @ Aug 9 2010, 08:35 PM) *
Actually I want to ask the thread something; the movie didn't explain where Cobbs originally got the dreaming device, right? Was it explained in the prequel comic? I mean the device isn't available to the public. It wasn't explained. Does anybody have an answer?

Wait... prequel comic? Am I missing something here?

Anyway, I wouldn't worry about it. You can't expect Nolan to answer every little thing. I mean, if you're going to ask about the device, why not also ask where Arthur or Eames got their totems? Or how everyone go into the profession? Or any other detail that's not particularly important to the storyline?
 
brooklyneast05
post Aug 12 2010, 08:37 PM
Post #93


I'm Jc
********

Group: Mentor
Posts: 13,619
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 437,556



i saw this. i liked it. the end didn't bother me. the shit wobbled, they said over and over that physics didn't matter in a dream, so why would it wobble in a dream? never did before. i'm fine with it.

 
itskamanstar
post Aug 12 2010, 08:51 PM
Post #94


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 633,509



QUOTE(Joanne @ Aug 10 2010, 03:38 AM) *
Wait... prequel comic? Am I missing something here?

Anyway, I wouldn't worry about it. You can't expect Nolan to answer every little thing. I mean, if you're going to ask about the device, why not also ask where Arthur or Eames got their totems? Or how everyone go into the profession? Or any other detail that's not particularly important to the storyline?


Yeah there's a prequel comic apparently. :P I haven't read it yet.

Yeah, that's true. I just thought it was weird- clearly the device wasn't available to the general public, but I guess it's not really important.
 
datass
post Aug 13 2010, 10:44 AM
Post #95


(′ ・ω・`)
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,179
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 72,477



QUOTE(hitandrun @ Aug 13 2010, 09:17 AM) *

awesome.
 
iRapediCarly
post Aug 13 2010, 12:24 PM
Post #96


Senior Member
*****

Group: Official Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Sep 2009
Member No: 745,302



 
datass
post Aug 13 2010, 12:58 PM
Post #97


(′ ・ω・`)
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,179
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 72,477



 
sixfive
post Aug 13 2010, 02:03 PM
Post #98



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,020
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



 
brooklyneast05
post Aug 13 2010, 03:37 PM
Post #99


I'm Jc
********

Group: Mentor
Posts: 13,619
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 437,556



i used to read word up magazine. salt n pepa & heavy d up in the limousine. hangin pictures on my wall. every saturday, rap attack, mr. magic, marley marl


 
lojay
post Aug 17 2010, 10:01 PM
Post #100


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 493
Joined: Sep 2004
Member No: 47,340



JGL apparently has a brother who is a fire spinner... who goes by Burning Dan.





And he even has a tumblr.

Interview with him here.

QUOTE
I take it you've seen 'Inception.'
Yes.

Care to sum it up?
'Inception' felt like the smartest movie since 'The Matrix,' and 'The Matrix' is really important to me. I can see little kids growing up really thinking about their dreams and what their reality is -- because they grew up playing 'Inception.' I find it unbelievably inspiring that they made such a huge movie that is truly and artistically relevant. It was so smart, it really made you think. I love the idea that this will help other movies take more risks and challenge people more and not be so formulaic. Just awesome.
 

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: