quote me.
i'm pretty sure last time this was brought up outside of backstage, i was with the "no quoting images unless it's on a different page" gang.

She asked a question, not stated a fact. Stop being such a bitch about everything.

What's on a different page for you isn't on a different page for everyone else. Tung's post where he quoted Jane's picture was on the same page, for me, as Jane's post.

I guess you didn't understand my reply, so to be more direct: no, it wasn't... unless I was misinterpreted.

and honestly, Spencer, I could say the same thing to you. All I did was remove your image tags and issue you a warning, which was taken down shortly - I could've gotten all up in your face with that PM harrassing you for not taking down img tags which has been kind of a rule for a while, but I didn't, all right?

I'm not a perfect mod, obviously, since I didn't see your posts (or any others that I've missed) 24 hours or however many hours after the post was made... and I don't catch things right away, and I'm not always online when stuff happens, but hell. I don't stalk the forums looking for trouble to "resolve" and image tags to remove.

No, it's not all right. You're a bitch. It was taken down shortly after because I had to ASK for it to be taken down. You can't hold us accountable for a rule that isn't posted in the "rules".

Go ahead and PM me harassing messages. You're not all you make yourself out to be. Go complain about me Backstage or something like half of the other mods do.

what does it mean by "been here long enough", there's some gray area there

Being active before the "no quoting images" rule was instated, I suppose. Also, members who have discussed the rule have acknowledged its existence, so that counts too.

Discrimination, imo.

That was a misunderstanding. You can look the word up if you want.

If I bitch about you, it'll be on aim, not in the CC/RC/backstage or anywhere on CB... and I'm really not on aim all that much. If it really bothers you that I don't talk about you enough, I'll try and make more of an effort.

That's like me saying Ruth should be more approachable because she's on staff, but is she? No.

Right-o, Suzzette.

Why is this still an issue if it's already been resolved?

It's like a dog chasing it's own tail. We're not getting anywhere, just repeating the same things over and over. The rules have been updated the warn has been dropped.

I haven't seen an apology.

It only takes 15 seconds to edit a post if an image has been quoted. Just do it. You guys are moderators. I had to pick up after everyone's shit back then too.

These rules are retarded. I think, rather than being so nitpicky about QUOTING IMAGES, that you should focus on more important issues like getting that stick out of your ass.

OMG, GIGI

Stop.

lol, Elba, just sayin'.

There are pictures of naked ladies lying around and you guys worry about regular, contributing members quoting images?! There is a serious imbalance of priorities here.

EDIT Hey, it got fixed. Thanks Dani. :) I think that was you, anyway.

gigi4admin

Yeah, that was me. I'm on Skype but keep coming back and seeing them. :P

why isn't gigi admin?! she makes so much sense.

Absolutely no offense to Gigi, but that's the problem around here. Everyone is like "oh so and so is SO OUTSPOKEN! they should be on staff!! omfg!" and then they get hired and do a full 360.

I asked Jusun both Backstage and via PM if quoting images is a site related issue. If it is not, perhaps we can do away with this. I can't promise anything, but I did want to let you know that this has been communicated.

Don't worry, none taken. I don't want to be, nor do I think I would be, a good admin. Keep in mind, of the two people who brought it up, one of them was Tung, and the other person's only been active for 4 days.

No offense Tung.

this image quoting argument is dumb to me. i can't figure out why we spend so much time arguing over it. i hope we can just get rid of this stupid rule so we can move on to bitching about something more interesting.

You know what else is stupid? People that do stupid shit, get f**ked for it, and proceed to fight tooth and nail about said offense using petty ass arguments, and then proceed to act as though they've won the Nobel f**king Peace Prize when assholing their way through their offense.

They're f**king rules on a forum board. Why you guys spend so much of your time bitching and whining about them is beyond me. Work with them, work around them, enjoy the board. But then again -- this kind of shitbag behavior is probably what you enjoy the most.

On the other hand, wtf at warning Spencer 4 days later. His ass should've been on the burner day 1. And as for this new member, old member crap, wtf? Are new members not capable of reading rules? Ridiculous. I can see an instance in which new members might be given leeway, but this isn't one of them. They're new, not stupid.