Making the Debate Forum Exclusive, What do you think? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Making the Debate Forum Exclusive, What do you think? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
As I have spent a significant amount of time participating within these debate forums, I have come to a conviction that these boards would benifit greatly if this page were to become exclusive. Exclusive in the sense that direct permission would have to be given to allow one to participate, as in post, in these forums. Once permission has been granted that individual would have the right to normal posting within this forum.
I suggest this because I believe the quality of these debate forums is suffering and that such an action would greatly increase said quality. Memebers far too oftenly post arguments to never return to the debate threads. Many members do not respect the rules of debate, or make a mockery of such. Some members do not seem capable to be included in a reasonable and intellectual debate. A majority of the arguments posted are repeated arguments which have been served pages worth of rebuttles, yet continue to be posted. This all disrupts the point, and the enjoyement driven from these threads. Because of these reasons, and more, I wish that we could create a more close-knit, intellectual, and interested party for the debate section of Createblog. (I wanted to have the debate in here, as it was a debate, and I don't think I have any kind of serious influence on policy making here. I just want to see what everyone else thinks. After some deliberation here, maybe some of us could bring this idea, or another, to the attention of those who do make policy here.) Discuss? |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#126
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Human Posts: 659 Joined: Jan 2007 Member No: 494,019 ![]() |
Jeremy? I'm not sure if that's your name but spamming isn't the right way to go. ![]() OOOhhhhh...Gotcha. Josh said it was, he said it would get me street cred. Thank you Sandraa, never again. Goddamnit Josh... Josh, you're just a big hermaphroditic dick-pimple for telling me to bash these other scunty Cubers to gain CB street cred. You Are So A Gay. |
|
|
*Uronacid* |
![]()
Post
#127
|
Guest ![]() |
OOOhhhhh...Gotcha. Josh said it was, he said it would get me street cred. Thank you Sandraa, never again. Goddamnit Josh... Josh, you're just a big hermaphroditic dick-pimple for telling me to bash these other scunty Cubers to gain CB street cred. You Are So A Gay. See what you did Sandraaa, GAAAHHHH!!! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#128
|
|
![]() <3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,369 Joined: Jun 2007 Member No: 539,187 ![]() |
I don't think individuals should get "permission" to post here
![]() I understand what everyone's saying about how some people just post nonsense. It's a persons opinion/point of view. If you make a topic in the debate forum, obviously you want opinions and why. People who can contribute to your questions may not be able to, because they don't have permission to do so. QUOTE Anyway ... I really don't think it's necessary to exclude people deemed "unworthy" from the debate forum. We should probably just implement a few rules like: 1. If you post an argument in a topic, go back and see the responses you've received. 2. Speak clearly, in complete sentences and try your best to spell correctly. 3. Do not repeat points that have already been made. Respond to other peoples' posts or describe new points to add to the discussion. 4. Skim through the posts before you post your own to get an idea of what's already happened and what would be appropriate for you to say. Yeah, that I agree with. It seems that's taken in action already though, which is good. It should help stop some 'nonsense' posts without restricting people. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#129
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#130
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Human Posts: 659 Joined: Jan 2007 Member No: 494,019 ![]() |
What has been proposed doesn't really restrict anyone either. So why propose it dumbass? What exactly is the point? The membership here can change. But, this place will probably have to change first. I've actually seen some very intelligent and capable people come through these debate forums. Can you figure out why they left? I would like to see those sorts of people stay, and with that, attract a more serious and interesting membership. Dude, how do you not understand that you are a f**kin idiot? You seriously are. Jesus christ, you're the very worst type of idiot too, the self-righteous ignorant retarded. You dont know jack shit. You think you have some knowledge of the world, but that's all in your head my friend. The reality is that you know next to nothing and some day you're gonna find that out the hard way. You don't know what intelligence is. You're f**kin 19, go do something with your life. Go get drunk, not wasted a-hole, just drunk. Im sure you never have, but you might actually find some fun out of life. Just don't overdo it, drink only enough to get you happy, not puking. So one beer should do it for you, you f**kin noob. |
|
|
*Uronacid* |
![]()
Post
#131
|
Guest ![]() |
So why propose it dumbass? What exactly is the point? Dude, how do you not understand that you are a f**kin idiot? You seriously are. Jesus christ, you're the very worst type of idiot too, the self-righteous ignorant retarded. You dont know jack shit. You think you have some knowledge of the world, but that's all in your head my friend. The reality is that you know next to nothing and some day you're gonna find that out the hard way. You don't know what intelligence is. You're f**kin 19, go do something with your life. Go get drunk, not wasted a-hole, just drunk. Im sure you never have, but you might actually find some fun out of life. Just don't overdo it, drink only enough to get you happy, not puking. So one beer should do it for you, you f**kin noob. You called him a noob... not cool... not cool... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#132
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
Dude, how do you not understand that you are a f**kin idiot? You seriously are. Jesus christ, you're the very worst type of idiot too, the self-righteous ignorant retarded. You dont know jack shit. You think you have some knowledge of the world, but that's all in your head my friend. The reality is that you know next to nothing and some day you're gonna find that out the hard way. You don't know what intelligence is. You're f**kin 19, go do something with your life. Go get drunk, not wasted a-hole, just drunk. Im sure you never have, but you might actually find some fun out of life. Just don't overdo it, drink only enough to get you happy, not puking. So one beer should do it for you, you f**kin noob. I haven't gotten this much attention in weeks. You love me. |
|
|
*Uronacid* |
![]()
Post
#133
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#134
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Human Posts: 659 Joined: Jan 2007 Member No: 494,019 ![]() |
I'm gonna rape Heather Donahue. Im gonna make her see my Blair Witch Project...in my pants. And she's gonna scream, and she's gonna drip snot, but it will happen.
|
|
|
*Uronacid* |
![]()
Post
#135
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#136
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 6,349 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 455,274 ![]() |
Only reason why Nosex wants to exclude members from debates is because as people read all his debates, typically his "atheist views" one comes to wonder what sort of bullshit is he feeding us. He's had excuse after excuse for nearly every answer, in terms of atheism at least.
Above that, he's the first one to start personal attacks. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#137
|
|
![]() nicola ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 66 Joined: Mar 2008 Member No: 635,560 ![]() |
Above that, he's the first one to start personal attacks. riiiiight: Who gives a shit what a human has to say about Gods work. So what if a Jew said 7 days. Mother f**ker what I'm sayin is... when God told his people it took him 7 days, mother f**ker it was his 7 days, not human, planetary, motherf**kin earthly 7 mther shit f**k 7 days. f**k!!! If God said, Earth is the size of a pea... motherf**ker, do you really think we're on planet earth the size of a pea? No.. this isn't taken literally. To God's enormous size... from his own EYES, from his OWN perception earth from the distance OF HIM makes the motehr f**kin shitty f**kin planet the size of the mother f**kin pea that's in your mother f**kin mouth mother f**ker!!.... anddd: Ah... well in that case, f**k you. Eat shit and die. ![]() .... And can you learn how to quote so you can just post once, instead of posting over and over. Post-whore. post-whore? ouch. You're insulting my belief system... so uh, f**k you, eat shit and die. You're lucky we aren't back in time. I'd cut your head off, infidel. That's what God likes. before you start pointing fingers, make sure your hands are clean~*~* |
|
|
![]()
Post
#138
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
Above that, he's the first one to start personal attacks. ... he said, as he personally attacked poor and helpless Nate.My intent is actually quite sincere here, and has always been. But, I don't feel like defending my method or behavior or character - that really isn't relevant to this discussion. So, here is a short reiteration of my idea: 1. Make a new membership group that has exclusive access to the debate threads. a. this group would be exclusive posted rights b. all other groups would still be able to read the debate threads 2. Applicants may or may not undergo screening or evaluation. a. if screening of applicants was implemented, it would not be strict or political. It would merely be used to ensure that the applicant had a sincere desire to be involved in meaningful argumentation. b. If no screening was required, applicants would be given the privilege of posting. 3. New debate guidelines and rules would be implemented. a. clearer and more precise guidelines b. clearer and more precise punishments. c. possibly suggestive materials on the art and appropriate procedures of argumentation. 4. Posting would be a privilege not a right. a. all members of the debate group would be subject to removal. b. extended absence, refusal to follow guidelines and rules, etc. etc. would result in the privilege of posting be removed. This isn't anything wildly revolutionary and I have seen it been done right and successfully on many different occasions. I feel that it is one of the best opportunities this community has for improving, and encouraging, the quality of these forums. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#139
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 6,349 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 455,274 ![]() |
Then why not make a member's only debate forum and leave the one that already exists intact.
![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#140
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#141
|
|
![]() ;) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Duplicate Posts: 2,374 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,760 ![]() |
That, of course, would be the largest obstacle. Designated moderators would be involved in allowing permission into the debate threads. They could have personal interviews with applicants over PM's, IM, or E-mail. All of this contact information would be stickied and provided for interested parties. The moderator would be looking for the applicant's intentions, maturity, and capabilities. It may be asked of the applicant to provide a brief written work of expository writing or a list of positions on major issues with short justifications for each (in fact, a list of important issues could be suggested). The moderator would use his or her own discretion in accepting an applicant. This, of course, is one way that it could be done, among numerous others that exist. I have seen this work very well on other community boards and was very impressed by the increased quality of their debate threads. I don't think for a second that this would be too difficult to impliment. I do agree with you on the point that the debate forum is brought down by excessive spam, posts that bring up arguments without back up, and pretty much ridiculous back-and-forth arguments that sometimes have nothing to do with the topic at hand. An interview, however, is not a good way to go about this. Who really wants to actually apply just to be able to post their opinions in a forum? I think there should be debate moderators who'll warn members that just spam in the threads and if there are certain people who really have nothing to contribute, have it so they can't post in debate. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#142
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 6,349 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 455,274 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#143
|
|
![]() me gustas tu ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 53 Joined: Apr 2008 Member No: 639,446 ![]() |
this thread is the very reason that we should kick all the idiots out of this forum.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#144
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 6,349 Joined: Aug 2006 Member No: 455,274 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |