layout, <-- Click for free cookies. (batteries not included) |
This Month's Contests | Hosts Looking for Hostees | Hostees looking for Hosts | BigBookofResources
Submission Guidelines
![]() ![]() |
layout, <-- Click for free cookies. (batteries not included) |
Mar 22 2008, 04:46 PM
Post
#26
|
|
![]() Naomi loves you. Y'all may call me NaNa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,925 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 427,774 |
Yeah but you could make room for a extra box at the bottom too.
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 04:49 PM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
eh wtf. first I need to remove the box, now I must add one? :O!
EDIT/ above or below the nav? |
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 04:58 PM
Post
#28
|
|
![]() Sing to Me ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,825 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 10,808 |
I don't like the scrollbar. It extends too long (which means the content box is too long). It overlaps with your graphics at the bottom. The colors of the scrollbar annoy me and it doesn't seem to fit. Try only having the arrows.
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 05:02 PM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() Naomi loves you. Y'all may call me NaNa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,925 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 427,774 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 05:08 PM
Post
#30
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
how big should it be? 100, 150 pixels?
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 05:16 PM
Post
#31
|
|
![]() Naomi loves you. Y'all may call me NaNa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,925 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 427,774 |
Just play around with the sizes and we'll see what looks better.
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 05:53 PM
Post
#32
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
now?
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 07:23 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Free the Caged Bird. Let it Sing. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 168 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 622,056 |
lmao for a simple layout like that you sure are getting a lot of things to fix about it. xD
"no no no, the colors!" "that box!" "add another!" "that's wrong" |
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 07:48 PM
Post
#34
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
I know! Take away this box! Now add it back again! -.-
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 09:12 PM
Post
#35
|
|
![]() Naomi loves you. Y'all may call me NaNa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,925 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 427,774 |
Hey it's just suggestions, it's up to if you if you want to try them.
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 09:47 PM
Post
#36
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
I will do whatever I must to get it accepted ^.^
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 11:08 PM
Post
#37
|
|
![]() Napple Hunter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 100 Joined: Mar 2008 Member No: 631,472 |
Lol. You kind of remind me of Jakkin Stewart, from the pit dragon trilogy.
Make the blog DIV shorter, it touches the edge. Eew. And make the scrollbar track color for the DIVs' green. And it seems like the content box goes down too low. Make it not so tall. Otherwise, I really like it. :] You're the first person I've seen who actually made the cursor stay default while scrolling over links without blinking to the hand for a split second. Kudos. |
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 04:30 PM
Post
#38
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
^ Yup took me a while to figure out exactly how to do that. the hand blink looks hideous.. I hate it :D
There is no such thing as "the DIV's green." The div is a gradient; No matter what color I put the scrollbar, some parts will not match. EDIT// do you think the DIV would look better SOLID so that the scroll bars would match? EDIT// I, myself, like the gradient, but I don't mind changing it. |
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 09:36 PM
Post
#39
|
|
![]() Napple Hunter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 100 Joined: Mar 2008 Member No: 631,472 |
It's a gradient!? Didn't even notice.
I guess I can kinda see it now. But it just looks like my screen being weird 'cause it's LCD. So yeah. I'd change it for the scrollbar. |
|
|
|
Mar 23 2008, 10:10 PM
Post
#40
|
|
![]() Resource Center Tyrant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 2,263 Joined: Nov 2007 Member No: 593,306 |
The contrast is in your layout is hardly noticeable. I would either choose a darker green or a darker blue. It feels like an eye sore right now with similar colors paired with the blinding white. I don't like the two content boxes you have. . .it's confusing, and they are far too close to each other. I would do something to the bottom half of the content box to make it obvious that is actually a second content box.
I would also suggest using more than two colors. It looks pretty bland as it is right now just with a rounded table and one big brush at the bottom. And you need to look into coding for Firefox, as well. There is no gradient on Firefox. |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 12:24 AM
Post
#41
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
^ yes there is, its just a faint gradient.
|
|
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 04:19 PM
Post
#42
|
|
|
GD. <3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 1,222 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 198,566 |
I'd have suggested choosing a slightly less bright shade of green since the contrast is a bit eye popping, but I rather like the gradient you used.
As for the navigation links, I'd suggest leaving them at the top, but instead, creating a horizontal bar with rounded corners that follows the outline of the main box in stead of just squares. You might want to try making the boxes bigger, and spiffing up the link area design with maybe a simple hover effect. I'd also suggest extending the flower pattern a little up the left hand side vertically to create some vertical flow. As a whole, I think its nice, but still a bit empty. I suggest going for a subtle tiled background maybe? |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 05:53 PM
Post
#43
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 1,815 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 423,396 |
It's alright. The colors are nice and go pretty well together, and the fancy design at the bottom looks clean and high-quality. I'm assuming this layout is only good for Firefox users? Cause on Maxthon and IE, the transparency for the main image isn't working; instead it shows a white box behind it. Since your background is plain and doesn't have anything on it, it might be best to just make your main layout image a JPG or even a solid GIF, for extended browser compatibility.
|
|
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 10:13 PM
Post
#44
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
It's alright. The colors are nice and go pretty well together, and the fancy design at the bottom looks clean and high-quality. I'm assuming this layout is only good for Firefox users? Cause on Maxthon and IE, the transparency for the main image isn't working; instead it shows a white box behind it. Since your background is plain and doesn't have anything on it, it might be best to just make your main layout image a JPG or even a solid GIF, for extended browser compatibility. It works perfectly fine. you simply do not have the lastest version of IE and whatever the other browser was you named. ( I use IE btw ). EDIT// clicky for latest version of IE |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 05:27 PM
Post
#45
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 1,815 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 423,396 |
It works perfectly fine. you simply do not have the lastest version of IE and whatever the other browser was you named. ( I use IE btw ). EDIT// clicky for latest version of IE You can't expect people to have the latest version of IE. The number of IE7 is growing, but there are still a lot of IE6 users. But then again, this is only if you want your layout to have near-maximum browser compatibility. |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 06:33 PM
Post
#46
|
|
![]() This bag is not a toy. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,090 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 583,108 |
Plus there are ways to make PNG transparencies work. You simply should not use them at all unless you plan on making them work in IE6, because there's still a large group of people who use it. :3
I think it looks alright in the browser I'm using (Firefox), the lines are clean and everything looks crisp. My only problem is the background - it appears to be a solid color for me, no matter how "faint" the gradient is, I can't see it. =\ I would make the gradient a bigger change so it's noticeable in the background (if that's what you're referring to, I can't see it ;_;), because right now the background is too plain. Maybe if you had a tall background image that tiled horizontally? you could have a line going all the way through the center, maybe, with a fading pattern of some kind to give it some subtle interest. Just a thought! :) I like the top navigation, though. |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 10:02 PM
Post
#47
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
there is no gradient in the background.
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2008, 10:38 PM
Post
#48
|
|
![]() This bag is not a toy. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 3,090 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 583,108 |
I was trying to figure out which "gradient" people were referring to. *shrug*
|
|
|
|
Mar 26 2008, 11:39 AM
Post
#49
|
|
![]() :hammer: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,849 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,700 |
It seems a little too high up.. maybe it's just my resolution.
But.. hm.. add text ? |
|
|
|
Mar 26 2008, 04:32 PM
Post
#50
|
|
![]() kthxbai ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Designer Posts: 2,832 Joined: Feb 2008 Member No: 621,203 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |