Honestly girls, would you date a guy who has no money? Don't give me that bullshit about money doesn't matter and it's all about if he cares about you or not. I'm not saying that isn't important, but money is also important too. Would you go out with some dude who has no job, and no money or car to take you places, or treat you out to dinner, or get you nice gifts? Be honest.

Heard that JC?

Just a little note, when you guys go on your first date.

This is America man... the Capitalist nation of the world. Our language is money, our religion is Capitalism, and our God is the pyramid on the back of the 1 dollar bill.

Does that answer your question? =\

i would, if i like the guy enough theres plenty of things you can do without a lot of money

as long as he's doing something to change the situation i'd be fine.

if he was a lazy bum just leeching off me and his parents then there would be a problem.

Like exercising?

^Haha.

No, I probably wouldn't. Wouldn't want to be the one paying for everything all the time. I don't think I'd ever like any guy enough to do that. AHHA.

I'll admit that I'm a materialistic bitch. So forreals - no money = no honey.

That's why it's always best to keep things mutual. When you go out... let the girl pay her half and the guy pay his half. And out of the kindness of his heart he'll pay whatever tip needs to be paid.

That way the woman can't bitch about ish.

my bf has his own shit to take care of but its not like he has a car or a place or anything besides a cell phone so i dont think im one of those girls who cares what he does with his money

uh no. I split everything in half. I just don't want anyone mooching off me. that is why no money = no honey. not because I need a dude to pay for me.

I'm materialistic in the sense that I am very into fashion, and I will only date metrosexual guys. Therefore, if they didn't have money, they wouldn't be able to dress well.

Metrosexual guys?

But I agree... split everything in half so no one can bitch.

^ that would save alot of relatioships

metro guys = guys who can dress themselves.

^ lmao

That's classic

I would say I'm slightly metrosexual.

Are you sure "just slightly"?

you looked like it in that 'greed' photo for cb's next top model. lol.
in a 'no homo' way.

i've been with my guy for about three years now. and there's been once or twice where both of us had no money or anything, like we couldn't even see each other [no gas = no car].
so we could only talk on the phone and stuff. but we were still together.

so i guess if the guy wasn't broke like that for a long time and he had a solid reason for it, then i'd probably stay with him. but if its for a long time because he's lazy, irresponsible, and doesn't want to make something of himself, then hell no.

I don't believe in men pluckin their eye brows, shaving their arms and legs (unless of course you're into swimming), nor manucares.

A real man would only shave his face, pluck his eyebrows only if he had a uni-brow (instead of tryin to shape them, like a female), nor would he worry about his callous on his hands.


Anyways, never judge a book by its cover. If you think only metrosexuals have money and are worthy of your time, you're brutally mistaken.

thats like dating a urban explorer(hobo)

For me personally, I wouldn't mind if he didn't have a job (as long as he wasn't a bum) and I wouldn't mind if he didn't have money either. I would kind of mind if he didn't have a car though... just because I get tired of driving people around after awhile.

Other than that though... I kind of like being self sufficient. I don't like it when people pay for me. I feel that since I have the money to pay and it is for something that I want then I should be able to pay for it. I hate it when my boyfriend pays for me. We made an agreement that he is only allowed to pay for my ticket when we go out to the movies.